Can we start using relations for this already? Really seems like that
provides the specifics we want for this.
So far nobody has provided a real world example of a place where the simple
distance-to-next would not be correct. If somebody does that, then a relation
could be made up.
-Original Message-
From: Kytömaa Lauri [mailto:lauri.kyto...@aalto.fi]
Sent: 21 November 2012 08:51
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Stop sign?
Can we start using relations for this already? Really seems like that
provides
the specifics we
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
What I never do anymore is to tag the node of the crossing with it. So even
if all 4 roads have a stop sign, I'd create for nodes for them on all
approaches.
Are you doing the same for traffic_signals ? if not, why simply not
I (would) do this mostly for consistency. I have to admit I never HAD to do
it, most stop signs in Belgium are used for their intended purpose: give
priority to the main road, not inhibit all traffic arriving at an
intersection.
A node on the way approaching a main road is unambiguous enough. One
Hi,
Thanks for all the replies. I will add those POIs to OSM.
This post is asking taggers and OSMOSE, OSMI et al customers to check that
* the highlighted fake node's tags are correct and everything that's
needed for the genuine way's tag
* the nodes are, /*or what should be changed to
Am 21/nov/2012 um 11:25 schrieb A.Pirard.Papou a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
created_by=(erased)
note=temporary node until nearby way speed limit is set
maxspeed=30
source:maxspeed=http://www.gpspassion.com/forumsen/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=123619
FIXME:tag same maxpeed and source:maxspeed onto the
If you have a data set of nodes representing street signs, why don't
you import them as such?
traffic_sign=BE:C43
maxspeed=30
source=?
Of course you still need to manually match those to the ways and tag
the maxspeed=* to them.
But you can use the traffic_sign=* nodes to create a josm filter or
On 2012-11-20 10:40, A.Pirard.Papou wrote :
Hi,
A GPS addicts group has encoded a file of over 1000 30 km/h speed limits.
Their leader has just discovered OSM, ITO Map, etc...
He's promoting security much and would like his data into OSM.
I wrote on talk-be that this was doing it the other way
Are there examples of traffic signals that don't control all the ways
they're located? With stop signs, typical application only applies to one
or two of the intersecting ways, not all.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Jo
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:57:01 -0600
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Stop sign?
Are there examples of traffic signals that don't control all the ways they're
located? With stop signs, typical application only applies to one or two of
the
(resending as it got rejected the first time)
A.Pirard.Papou wrote:
I will certainly not manually enter 1000 entries in OpenStreetBugs
just in hope.
You could use their API:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetBugs/API_0.1
(read down to addPOIexec)
But someone may know how to use
Hi,
I wanted to map the agglomeration of my village and I am wondering again.
http://www.google.be/search?q=agglomération site:openstreetmap.org
-communauté
http://www.google.be/search?q=agglom%C3%A9ration%20site:openstreetmap.org%20-communaut%C3%A9
as well as a wiki search returns very vague
On mercredi 21 novembre 2012, A.Pirard.Papou wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
OSM-talk-fr sounds like associating agglomération and speed limit.
I don't think we do.
A french agglomération implies some speed limits (bellow 50km/h)
But speed limits doesn't imply you are in an agglomération.
An agglomération
On 11/21/12 2:34 PM, Anthony wrote:
I believe we came to an agreement that if the sign says emergency use
only, the tag should be access=no, emergency=yes. If the sign says do
not enter, the tag should be access=no.
actually, i'm going to disagree. to label these properly it's important
to
On 2012-11-21 14:55, Ben Laenen wrote :
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 14:29:31 A.Pirard.Papou wrote:
I think I was clear enough presenting the options I knew to help this guy.
No replies.
Now that I have prepared the quickest option 1, I receive all sorts of
contradicting replies.
Why not
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 20:52:50 sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
That's the current state of recommendation, but maybe we could start
discussing it to see if that's a good idea to apply speed limits on roads
inside a bounding polygon
Polygons are a bad idea to map built-up areas. It's not
How do we tag agglom?rations?
What's about the proposal for urban settlements?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Urban_settlements
Alberto
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Adding 1000 nodes to the OSM DB, which are meant to be deleted once again
seems like some sort of pollution. On the other hand it would be possible
to join them to the ways, since the ways need to be split anyway as the
maxspeed changes there.
Kaly nychta,
Polyglot
2012/11/21 A.Pirard.Papou
On 2012-11-21 21:26, Ben Laenen wrote :
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 20:52:50 sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
That's the current state of recommendation, but maybe we could start
discussing it to see if that's a good idea to apply speed limits on roads
inside a bounding polygon
Polygons are a
On 11/21/12 4:00 PM, Anthony wrote:
If emergency responders are exempt from access restrictions (which they are
in every jurisdiction I've ever read the law on), then the access tags are
of limited usefulness regardless.
they are valuable as a way of storing verified information.
Relying on
Overlooking the discussion so far, I think exit_to cannot be deprecated.
However, there's strong feelings to support both destination and exit_to.
In my opinion, the following things can be done:
1. keep things the way they are now (where exit_to is the preffered choice,
because the text on the
On 2012-11-21 21:40, Ben Laenen wrote :
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 21:16:24 A.Pirard.Papou wrote:
Can we spend the time you speak of checking that everyone's favorite
Inspector is highlighting the errors and that they are not masking other
errors or pissing off people.
Ugh, this isn't about
Hi,
Le mercredi 21 novembre 2012 22:53:53, A.Pirard.Papou a écrit :
Look at multilinestring, which I see as a swiss-knife way assembly.
In my mind, such a relation is the way to assign the same tags to a
collection of objects making a whole with regard to those tags. If we
add recursion
On 11/21/12 7:32 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
On 11/21/12 4:00 PM, Anthony wrote:
If emergency responders are exempt from access restrictions (which they
are
in every jurisdiction I've ever read the law on), then the access
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:50:42 +0100
From: osm...@gmail.com
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] exit_to on motorway_junction
b. no solution of the exit_to_left yet to support both branches There is a
solution in the form of this proposal that I made awhile ago that nobody
On 2012-11-21 22:45, Jo wrote :
Adding 1000 nodes to the OSM DB, which are meant to be deleted once
again seems like some sort of pollution.
I said: non obtrusive. That is, believed to be harmless. That is, not
seen on the map, not retrieved by any application, just appearing on
both OSMI and
26 matches
Mail list logo
