Hi,
On 07/19/2013 03:33 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
Of the solutions, I feel that calling it what it's called locally is
preferable. Anyone who cares to compare across countries is going to have
to parse the location first anyway.
We've managed to handle creating definitions that we could
2013/7/19 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
On 07/19/2013 03:33 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
We've managed to handle creating definitions that we could use
worldwide for pretty much everything else, including roads, sports,
other schools, various amenities, etc.
Have we really?
In Italy
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com
That seems okay to me.
Not for me. I think the address is a feature by ifself, not an
attribute of other features (like 'name'). For instance, a routing
software cares about a unique address when only the address is
provided.
2013/7/19 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
For addresses, most of them have a simple 1:1
relationship with a building (probable not in urban areas).
This really depends on the area, in some German regions the address is for
a site, and (if needed) for entrances to buildings or staircases on that
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
Example use case: a corporate campus with multiple buildings,
but a single postal address.
Either your corporate campus is a single polygone (containing the
buildings), then put the address on this polygon. Or the
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
On 07/19/2013 03:33 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
Of the solutions, I feel that calling it what it's called locally is
preferable. Anyone who cares to compare across countries is going to
have
to parse the location
On 19/07/2013 12:50, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
As for kindergarten, while the name may have an obvious German origin,
my question is what the British definition of the word is, since it's
British English that we use in OSM as our base language, and does that
British definition differ from the
Serge Wroclawski wrote:
As for kindergarten, while the name may have an obvious German
origin, my question is what the British definition of the word is,
since it's British English that we use in OSM as our base language,
and does that British definition differ from the US definition.
In
Forking the discussion from Double and misfitting house numbers
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
Not for me. I think the address is a feature by ifself, not an
attribute of other features (like 'name').
I want to know what do people think about addresses.
1.
2013/7/19 Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
1. Are addresses features as Pieren suggests? Thus addresses should be
mapped separately or at least tagged singularly on the primary object that
represents the address.
2. Or are addresses attributes (like names) of POIs, buildings, and the
I like the address as a feature approach because not all addressed 'things'
exist, and 'things' can have many addresses. That's how we deal with addresses
in my gov's GIS.
For example: a vacant lot often has an address, but there doesn't need to be a
building there.
Also some shopping
2013/7/19 Elliott Plack elliott.pl...@gmail.com
For example: a vacant lot often has an address, but there doesn't need to
be a building there.
Also some shopping centers have multiple addresses for the same building,
so we make address points for each entrance or centroid.
yes, this is
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 11:04 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Another object that comes to my mind is amenity=pub. You will usually
get something to eat in a pub in the UK, but you won't in many German
amenity=pub (indeed it might have been a good idea to invent
something dedicated for the
Sometimes a lot's address (for tax purposes) is different from the building
address (which may be driven by a desire to be on a more 'popular' street
name).
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.comwrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
access=permissive (while nominally private, no visible attempt is made
to restrict access, and casual use appears to be tolerated by
15 matches
Mail list logo
