Re: [Tagging] Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=social_path

sent from a phone > Il giorno 13 giu 2016, alle ore 07:17, John Willis ha scritto: > > Something, *anything* to separate hiking trails from sidewalks and other > footways. It is, in the literal meaning of the word, incomprehensible to me > that there is no way to separate

Re: [Tagging] Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=social_path

On 13/06/2016 06:17, John Willis wrote: Something, *anything* to separate hiking trails from sidewalks and other footways. It is, in the literal meaning of the word, incomprehensible to me that there is no way to separate sidewalks and hiking routes. You could start with a "surface" tag...

Re: [Tagging] Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=social_path

> On Jun 13, 2016, at 5:13 PM, Mark Wagner wrote: > > In my experience, the > defining characteristic of a trail is that it isn't paved. So why isn't every track highway=service + surface=* Motorway? Service road? Both concrete - same usage and expected

Re: [Tagging] Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=social_path

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:17:49 +0900 John Willis wrote: > Javbw > > On Jun 13, 2016, at 8:22 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: > > >> Highway=trail > > > > I don't think we need to change path to trail. It's basically the > > same thing. > > Path=trail >

Re: [Tagging] Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=social_path

sent from a phone > Il giorno 13 giu 2016, alle ore 01:22, Greg Troxel ha > scritto: > > I agree there should be some tag to show that a trail/path is the main > one. do we need a tag, or is it evident by the routes that use the ways? cheers, Martin

Re: [Tagging] Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=social_path

sent from a phone > Il giorno 13 giu 2016, alle ore 14:23, Greg Troxel ha > scritto: > It could be that the trail everybody thinks > is main is not official. And non-main trails may be official and may > be not-official. So I would like to see one tag for official/not

Re: [Tagging] Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=social_path

Martin Koppenhoefer writes: > sent from a phone > >> Il giorno 13 giu 2016, alle ore 01:22, Greg Troxel ha >> scritto: >> >> I agree there should be some tag to show that a trail/path is the main >> one. > > do we need a tag, or is it evident by the

Re: [Tagging] Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=social_path

sent from a phone > Il giorno 13 giu 2016, alle ore 12:03, John Willis ha scritto: > > Being able to define them separately and get them rendered differently allows > for proper interpretation and expected conditions - Just like an alley vs a > farming road vs a motorway - Is

Re: [Tagging] Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=social_path

John Willis writes: [dropping things replied to already] > On Jun 13, 2016, at 8:22 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: >>> Subkey: >>> Trail=main (usually there is some backbone path that all trails branch out >>> from in a large park.) >>> Trail=official (officially

Re: [Tagging] Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=social_path

Martin Koppenhoefer writes: > sent from a phone > >> Il giorno 13 giu 2016, alle ore 12:03, John Willis ha >> scritto: >> >> Being able to define them separately and get them rendered >> differently allows for proper interpretation and expected

Re: [Tagging] Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=social_path

> On Jun 14, 2016, at 11:27 AM, Tod Fitch wrote: > > > There is at least one proposal for path/trail difficulty in the wiki [1] and > at least one that appears accepted and in use [2]. Of course neither of those > is an exact match for the Yosemite Decimal System[3]

Re: [Tagging] Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=social_path

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 07:59:18 -0400 Greg Troxel wrote: > Martin Koppenhoefer writes: > > > sent from a phone > > > >> Il giorno 13 giu 2016, alle ore 01:22, Greg Troxel > >> ha scritto: > >> > >> I agree there should be some tag to