Re: [Tagging] self-service laudry machines a camp and caravan sites

2017-02-12 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 11 Feb 2017, at 17:10, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > For the convenience store on a camp site I would happily use the shop key > whereas for the laundry facilities I would prefer something like > washing_machine=yes|NUMBER > dryer =yes|NUMBER > In

Re: [Tagging] lanes=3 + lanes:forward/backward=1 for "semi-divided" roads?

2017-02-12 Thread Topographe Fou
Marc, it looks like you propose to tag it as a lane which can be used to turn which is not what Roadsguy wants to do (if I get it right...). If the central line can't be used but exists I would put lanes:both_ways=1 access:lanes:both_ways=no LeTopographeFou   Message original   De:

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power pole extension

2017-02-12 Thread Mike Thompson
Jherome, Thanks for your work on this. I will study this more, but one thing that jumped out is that in one of your examples you stated "phase=2." Having spent some time in the electrical industry (in the U.S.) my understanding is there is no such thing as "2 phase", only single phase and three

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carport

2017-02-12 Thread Joachim
I thought the same now: Discussion was positive and the tag is already in use. So I created the feature page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dcarport and set the status of the feature and the proposal to "in Use". Thanks Joachim 2017-02-04 20:40 GMT+01:00 Yves

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power pole extension

2017-02-12 Thread Jherome Miguel
This is the second RFC I sent the proposal for an extended tagging of power poles. I sent a previous RFC, but with no comments requested. The goal of the power pole extension proposal is to extend the tagging of power poles, which has limited tags and allow the use of power=pole on power=line

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power pole extension

2017-02-12 Thread ajt1...@gmail.com
On 12/02/2017 20:07, Mike Thompson wrote: Jherome, ... Having spent some time in the electrical industry (in the U.S.) my understanding is there is no such thing as "2 phase", only single phase and three phase. In terms of supply to premises, you're going to get single phase or

Re: [Tagging] self-service laudry machines a camp and caravan sites

2017-02-12 Thread Mark Wagner
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:28:17 +0900 John Willis wrote: > Javbw > > Side note: > > I imagine laundromats could have a whole > > Laundromat:foobar=n scheme. > > Laundromat:10kg_dryer=8 > Laundromat:20kg_dryer=2 > Laundromat:10kg_sidewasher=3 > Laundromat:20kg_sidewasher=1 >

Re: [Tagging] lanes=3 + lanes:forward/backward=1 for "semi-divided" roads?

2017-02-12 Thread Mark Wagner
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 23:39:00 -0500 Albert Pundt wrote: > Consider High Street in downtown Carlisle, PA. It is one lane each > way, with a wide space as wide as a travel lane in the middle, but > not used for anything such as a center turning lane. Tagging this > with just

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power pole extension

2017-02-12 Thread Kevin Kenny
I think I've seen two-phase power once, in a commercial building in Philadelphia, built around 1905. All the high-power uses (HVAC, mostly) in the building were actually driven off 208 or 480 volt three-phase, provided by phase-converting transformers and switch gear. There were a handful 240-volt

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power pole extension

2017-02-12 Thread Warin
I think the incorrect term '2 phase' is the split single phase (or single phase 3 wire) that the Americans use, 120 v from 'neutral' to either line but 240 v from line to line and that 240 v is termed '2 phase' despite the fact that it is a single phase. All of these lines are supposed to

Re: [Tagging] self-service laudry machines a camp and caravan sites

2017-02-12 Thread Tristan Anderson
All washing machines have a load capacity in kg. It may not be printed on the front of the unit but it can be found in the owners' manual or online. I would caution against the key "Laundromat:10kg_sidewasher" because they aren't always round numbers like that. For example this triple-load

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power pole extension

2017-02-12 Thread Mike Thompson
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13-Feb-17 10:25 AM, Tristan Anderson wrote: > > If two-phase power isn't currently in use anywhere, it simply means we > won't see any instances of the tag phases=2, just like how we'll never see > phases=17. It doesn't

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power pole extension

2017-02-12 Thread Warin
On 13-Feb-17 10:25 AM, Tristan Anderson wrote: If two-phase power isn't currently in use anywhere, it simply means we won't see any instances of the tag phases=2, just like how we'll never see phases=17. It doesn't make anything fundamentally wrong with the tagging scheme. I believe this

Re: [Tagging] self-service laudry machines a camp and caravan sites

2017-02-12 Thread Warin
On 13-Feb-17 07:38 AM, Mark Wagner wrote: On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:28:17 +0900 John Willis wrote: Javbw Side note: I imagine laundromats could have a whole Laundromat:foobar=n scheme. Laundromat:10kg_dryer=8 Laundromat:20kg_dryer=2 Laundromat:10kg_sidewasher=3

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power pole extension

2017-02-12 Thread Tristan Anderson
There's an intersting discussion about this here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:power%3Dtransformer Here it is suggested that split single-phase power be tagged as phases=2. I disagree with this, and instead advocate tagging it as phases=1 voltage=240. In North America at

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power pole extension

2017-02-12 Thread Tristan Anderson
If two-phase power isn't currently in use anywhere, it simply means we won't see any instances of the tag phases=2, just like how we'll never see phases=17. It doesn't make anything fundamentally wrong with the tagging scheme. I believe this is a good proposal that should be voted on.

Re: [Tagging] self-service laudry machines a camp and caravan sites

2017-02-12 Thread John Willis
Javbw > On Feb 13, 2017, at 5:38 AM, Mark Wagner wrote: > > > That wouldn't work too well in the US. Here, capacities are > typically measured in notional "loads": the average laundromat would > have a large number of "single-load" machines, a few "double-load" or >

Re: [Tagging] lanes=3 + lanes:forward/backward=1 for "semi-divided" roads?

2017-02-12 Thread Marc Gemis
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Mark Wagner wrote: > I'd consider mapping it as a dual carriageway. I don't know what the > law is in Pennsylvania, but here in Idaho, a doubled double-yellow > line is the legal equivalent of a physical barrier: you are not allowed > to

Re: [Tagging] self-service laudry machines a camp and caravan sites

2017-02-12 Thread Warin
On 13-Feb-17 03:42 PM, John Willis wrote: Javbw On Feb 13, 2017, at 5:38 AM, Mark Wagner wrote: That wouldn't work too well in the US. Here, capacities are typically measured in notional "loads": the average laundromat would have a large number of "single-load"

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power pole extension

2017-02-12 Thread François Lacombe
Hi, Thank you Jherome for this clarification attempt. No objection against mixing poles and tower on any lines. Regarding the phase=2 discussion, phases=* have a clear definition. Occidental countries usualy have 3-phases power grids, but sometimes, 2 phases lines are used to feed train traction

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power pole extension

2017-02-12 Thread Warin
On 13-Feb-17 06:09 PM, François Lacombe wrote: Hi, Thank you Jherome for this clarification attempt. No objection against mixing poles and tower on any lines. Regarding the phase=2 discussion, phases=* have a clear definition. Occidental countries usualy have 3-phases power grids, but