sent from a phone
> On 11 Feb 2017, at 17:10, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> For the convenience store on a camp site I would happily use the shop key
> whereas for the laundry facilities I would prefer something like
> washing_machine=yes|NUMBER
> dryer =yes|NUMBER
> In
Marc, it looks like you propose to tag it as a lane which can be used to turn
which is not what Roadsguy wants to do (if I get it right...).
If the central line can't be used but exists I would put
lanes:both_ways=1
access:lanes:both_ways=no
LeTopographeFou
Message original
De:
Jherome,
Thanks for your work on this. I will study this more, but one thing that
jumped out is that in one of your examples you stated "phase=2." Having
spent some time in the electrical industry (in the U.S.) my understanding
is there is no such thing as "2 phase", only single phase and three
I thought the same now: Discussion was positive and the tag is already
in use. So I created the feature page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dcarport and set the
status of the feature and the proposal to "in Use".
Thanks
Joachim
2017-02-04 20:40 GMT+01:00 Yves
This is the second RFC I sent the proposal for an extended tagging of power
poles. I sent a previous RFC, but with no comments requested.
The goal of the power pole extension proposal is to extend the tagging of
power poles, which has limited tags and allow the use of power=pole on
power=line
On 12/02/2017 20:07, Mike Thompson wrote:
Jherome,
... Having spent some time in the electrical industry (in the U.S.)
my understanding is there is no such thing as "2 phase", only single
phase and three phase.
In terms of supply to premises, you're going to get single phase or
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:28:17 +0900
John Willis wrote:
> Javbw
>
> Side note:
>
> I imagine laundromats could have a whole
>
> Laundromat:foobar=n scheme.
>
> Laundromat:10kg_dryer=8
> Laundromat:20kg_dryer=2
> Laundromat:10kg_sidewasher=3
> Laundromat:20kg_sidewasher=1
>
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 23:39:00 -0500
Albert Pundt wrote:
> Consider High Street in downtown Carlisle, PA. It is one lane each
> way, with a wide space as wide as a travel lane in the middle, but
> not used for anything such as a center turning lane. Tagging this
> with just
I think I've seen two-phase power once, in a commercial building in
Philadelphia, built around 1905. All the high-power uses (HVAC, mostly) in
the building were actually driven off 208 or 480 volt three-phase, provided
by phase-converting transformers and switch gear. There were a handful
240-volt
I think the incorrect term '2 phase' is the split single phase (or
single phase 3 wire) that the Americans use, 120 v from 'neutral' to
either line but 240 v from line to line and that 240 v is termed '2
phase' despite the fact that it is a single phase. All of these lines
are supposed to
All washing machines have a load capacity in kg. It may not be printed on the
front of the unit but it can be found in the owners' manual or online. I would
caution against the key "Laundromat:10kg_sidewasher" because they aren't always
round numbers like that. For example this triple-load
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13-Feb-17 10:25 AM, Tristan Anderson wrote:
>
> If two-phase power isn't currently in use anywhere, it simply means we
> won't see any instances of the tag phases=2, just like how we'll never see
> phases=17. It doesn't
On 13-Feb-17 10:25 AM, Tristan Anderson wrote:
If two-phase power isn't currently in use anywhere, it simply means we
won't see any instances of the tag phases=2, just like how we'll never
see phases=17. It doesn't make anything fundamentally wrong with the
tagging scheme. I believe this
On 13-Feb-17 07:38 AM, Mark Wagner wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:28:17 +0900
John Willis wrote:
Javbw
Side note:
I imagine laundromats could have a whole
Laundromat:foobar=n scheme.
Laundromat:10kg_dryer=8
Laundromat:20kg_dryer=2
Laundromat:10kg_sidewasher=3
There's an intersting discussion about this here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:power%3Dtransformer
Here it is suggested that split single-phase power be tagged as phases=2. I
disagree with this, and instead advocate tagging it as phases=1 voltage=240.
In North America at
If two-phase power isn't currently in use anywhere, it simply means we won't
see any instances of the tag phases=2, just like how we'll never see phases=17.
It doesn't make anything fundamentally wrong with the tagging scheme. I
believe this is a good proposal that should be voted on.
Javbw
> On Feb 13, 2017, at 5:38 AM, Mark Wagner wrote:
>
>
> That wouldn't work too well in the US. Here, capacities are
> typically measured in notional "loads": the average laundromat would
> have a large number of "single-load" machines, a few "double-load" or
>
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Mark Wagner wrote:
> I'd consider mapping it as a dual carriageway. I don't know what the
> law is in Pennsylvania, but here in Idaho, a doubled double-yellow
> line is the legal equivalent of a physical barrier: you are not allowed
> to
On 13-Feb-17 03:42 PM, John Willis wrote:
Javbw
On Feb 13, 2017, at 5:38 AM, Mark Wagner wrote:
That wouldn't work too well in the US. Here, capacities are
typically measured in notional "loads": the average laundromat would
have a large number of "single-load"
Hi,
Thank you Jherome for this clarification attempt.
No objection against mixing poles and tower on any lines.
Regarding the phase=2 discussion, phases=* have a clear definition.
Occidental countries usualy have 3-phases power grids, but sometimes, 2
phases lines are used to feed train traction
On 13-Feb-17 06:09 PM, François Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
Thank you Jherome for this clarification attempt.
No objection against mixing poles and tower on any lines.
Regarding the phase=2 discussion, phases=* have a clear definition.
Occidental countries usualy have 3-phases power grids, but
21 matches
Mail list logo