[Tagging] how to map simple buildings

I have just started mapping according to the simple building scheme and have some questions to the more experienced mappers: A situation I meet very often are buildings consisting in several parts, e.g. often there are higher parts on the (flat) roof that are smaller than the rest. 1. Which

Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings

I usually go for a mixture of 1.1. and 1.3., i.e.   - use building:part for the architectural blocks the building is made of, with building:min_height / building:min_level where appropiate   - use type=multipolygon building=*, stuff the usual building tags into that, this will be rendered

Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings

Also note that there are some implications in 2d mapnik rendering. With the building outline we define and the mapnik rules that were set upto render everything highway=* _above_ anything else, the renderer _will_ overlap a building outline with a pedestrian area. Esp. when (highway=pedestrian

Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings

Thank you for the extensive answer. Here are some comments: 2017-03-02 15:24 GMT+01:00 "Christian Müller" : > I usually go for a mixture of 1.1. and 1.3., i.e. > > - use building:part for the architectural blocks the building is made of, > with building:min_height /

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

Hi Michael, On 02.03.2017 20:21, Michael Reichert wrote: Because the proposal violated the guideline, I would like to - remove the status "proposed" from its feature documentation page - reset the status of the proposal to "RFC" - to declare the voting as invalid by adding a note at the top of

Re: [Tagging] Mapping freeway stub ends?

+1 on highway=construction + construction=* + access is no if non-accessible If accessible (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=delta%2C%20be#map=18/50.81538/4.40527=N /

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

On 03-Mar-17 06:55 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote: Hi Michael, On 02.03.2017 20:21, Michael Reichert wrote: Because the proposal violated the guideline, I would like to - remove the status "proposed" from its feature documentation page - reset the status of the proposal to "RFC" - to declare the

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

sent from a phone > On 2 Mar 2017, at 20:55, Tobias Knerr wrote: > > While it's ok to overlook minor "rule violations" sometimes, things like not > announcing the vote do clearly have a big impact on the outcome. It's obvious > to me that the vote is invalid and needs

[Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

Hi, I have been informed by another mapper who uses XING (the German LikedIn) that there is a new tag motorcycle_friendly=yes. [1] Its wiki page says that the key has been proposed and accepted. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorcycle_friendly The proposal page can be found here:

Re: [Tagging] Mapping freeway stub ends?

> On Mar 2, 2017, at 12:40 PM, Tijmen Stam wrote: > > +1 on highway=construction + construction=* + access is no if non-accessible > If accessible (such as > https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=delta%2C%20be#map=18/50.81538/4.40527=N > / >

Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings

> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 17:19 Uhr > Von: "Martin Koppenhoefer" > An: "Christian Müller" > Cc: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > Betreff: Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings > > do I understand

Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings

> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 14:09 Uhr > Von: "Martin Koppenhoefer" > An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > Betreff: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings > > I have just started mapping according to the simple building

Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings

I'm hijacking the thread a bit here, but the discussion of "bridge buildings" in Martin's message made me think of this: On the campus of GE Research in Niskayuna, New York, there's a fairly substantial building that is on a bridge across a ravine. >From the way it renders, I think that I've

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

On 03-Mar-17 09:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 2 Mar 2017, at 20:55, Tobias Knerr wrote: While it's ok to overlook minor "rule violations" sometimes, things like not announcing the vote do clearly have a big impact on the outcome. It's obvious