Re: [Tagging] Attendant on amenity=fuel

On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote: > On 29 March 2018 at 11:58, Javier Sánchez Portero > wrote: > > > I'm looking for a key to denote if you have > > to refuel by your self or not. I meant if the station operates on self > >

Re: [Tagging] Attendant on amenity=fuel

There is also an automated key mentioned on the wiki. This applies mostly to self_service I would guess, and I assumed automated=yes indicates that you can pay at the pump. I didn’t mention the following because taginfo showed that it’s not used and there pretty surely is no software

Re: [Tagging] Attendant on amenity=fuel

On 29 March 2018 at 11:58, Javier Sánchez Portero wrote: > I'm looking for a key to denote if you have > to refuel by your self or not. I meant if the station operates on self > service mode. There are (at least) three modes: * Attendant service * Self service, pay at

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

Is public_transport=platform now about the structure or the function? If it is about the function, then we need a separate tag for the platform structure. If it is about the structure, then we should decide to either map the sidewalk or public_transport=platform (depending on how we define a

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

highway=platform and railway=platform on a WAY or an AREA are perfectly fine tags for such platforms, where they exist. Until about a year ago I was also adding public_transport=platform to these ways, but as it creates confusion with the platform NODES, which as far as I am concerned represent

Re: [Tagging] Attendant on amenity=fuel

2018-03-30 11:37 GMT+01:00 : > Based on the information provided here: > > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel#Service > > > > and what was stated in previous posts on the mailing list, I would guess > that the correct tags would be: > > >

Re: [Tagging] Attendant on amenity=fuel

could this be simplified with yes/no/only ? > 2018-03-30 11:37 GMT+01:00 : > Only serviced by attendant: > self_service=no > full_service=yes self_service=no > Self service always available, attended only during the day: >

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

I independently reached a conclusion similar to Jo's. No need for a separate tag; the difference is made clear when you look at whether it's a node, way or area. And there are lots of optional tags to indicate structural elements like benches, shelters, tactile pavement, etc. I don't usually go

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

One point that hasn't been discussed (and isn't in the subject line) is that part of Ilya's proposal is to also drop stations. I would move in the opposite direction and expand the role of stations. Here's why. In many (many) cases, GTFS data from bus operators includes a single StopPoint value

Re: [Tagging] Historic building usage

On 29.03.2018 15:38, Dave F wrote: > No. The building tag is for current usage. No, building tag is for the current building type church used as warehouse is still a church building (though no longer amenity=place_of_worship) See any documentation about how building tag is used

[Tagging] Carpet hangers

You may don't know about this, but in central and eastern--Europe countries there are outdoor carpet hangers for cleaning them before holidays. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpet_hanger They usually look like this: https://pareulicdalej.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/pc080668.jpg I see that

Re: [Tagging] Carpet hangers

It seems that amenity=beater is the most popular tagging (at least it was when I was checking it). On Sat, 31 Mar 2018, 18:12 Tomasz Wójcik, wrote: > You may don't know about this, but in central and eastern--Europe > countries there are outdoor carpet hangers for cleaning them

Re: [Tagging] Carpet hangers

And on similar line: I have seen several public carpet washing places in Finland, like this one: [1], located here: [2], but not on the map. [1] https://www.flickr.com/photos/voschix/41139585421/in/dateposted-friend/ [2] https://osm.org/go/01xhtNkQw-?m==2528474 Happy Easter On 31 March 2018 at