2018-07-02 1:53 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
> As for the function? No idea what the military are targeting there, the
> forestry probably decontamination=pathogen.
>
>
"pathogen" is too generic, it means anything that can make an organism ill.
I would expect any kind of
2018-07-01 19:07 GMT+02:00 Dave Swarthout :
> For now, I'm going to tag those untagged ways with route=canoe and then if
> some new development or an alternate tagging scenario presents itself
> later, I'll come back and change it.
>
+1, seems reasonable and the tag is used and documented on
2018-07-01 18:56 GMT+02:00 Volker Schmidt :
> The lagoon "canals" are connected to both rivers and the city "canals" in
> the sense that the lagoon "canals" are often the continuation of rivers or
> city "canals".
> Two Examples:
>
>- Fiume (River) Dese
Dear all,
New on this mailing list (but not on OSM), so please forgive me if I didn't
quite understand the old-school interface of this mailing list (-;
It looks like both these threads are strongly interconnected, so I try to
address them both, as they also refer to the work that I am doing
I do not agree with the proposal to use waterway=canal with a new canal=x
tag to indicate a non-existant waterway for canoes.
For the canoe routes, which started the canoe side of this discussion, I
would say that the in-water ways should be tagged as route=canoe without
problems and in
Hi all,
Consecutively to edits of page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:waterway%3Dcanal=history
I'd add that waterway=canal is really often supported by an artificial
structure and use it to cross a lake as a logical connection between entry
points is awkward.
Why simpler
