Two dots are used in some circles to indicate inclusive range. eg 21..27.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op wo 19 aug. 2020 om 00:25 schreef Tod Fitch :
>
> On Aug 18, 2020, at 2:29 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
>
>
> Maybe we should use a different character to indicate a range, such as a
> slash?
>
>
>
> In
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:29:50PM +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
> I think you misunderstand hyphenated addresses in Queens. The second
> part of the hyphenation is not a flat/apartment number. As an example,
> the Dunkin Donuts at the corner of 31st St and 36th Ave has an address
> of 31-02 36th Ave,
sent from a phone
> On 19. Aug 2020, at 01:38, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> similar meaning for funeral homes / funeral halls / funeral directors:
> shop=funeral_directors.
> The use of the key "shop=" is odd, but it's been used over 20,000 times so it
> seems to be well established:
Funeral directors are a business, this is a public facility (generally)
on a cemetery. A mortuary is for storing corpses, that's often
associated to this kind of ceremonial place, but not necessarily.
Am 19.08.2020 01:36 schrieb Joseph Eisenberg:
There is already an existing tag with similar
Indeed, this is not about a business, but a public facility.
Am 19.08.2020 09:34 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
sent from a phone
On 19. Aug 2020, at 01:38, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
similar meaning for funeral homes / funeral halls / funeral directors:
shop=funeral_directors.
The use of the
I could imagine rare cases of a privately run cemetery not linked to any
religion or belief/life stance and where there is such a building. But
typically, they would be public. That being said, all cemeteries I know
personally are run either by a government entity or a religious
denomination;
Not important at all. I just think that if it is ancillary to the
business of selling coffins, transporting corpses, preparing them for
burial, doing paperwork in relation to that etc. (what the French call a
"funérarium"), then it doesn't deserve a tag distinct from the funeral
directors tag
If there is a crematorium, I agree that it should take precedence, and I
can't imagine a crematorium without such a room. However, more often
than not, there is no crematorium while there is such a funeral hall
(quite often actually colloquially called a "chapel", but "chapel" falls
under the
On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 10:26 +0200, woll...@posteo.de wrote:
> Funeral directors are a business, this is a public facility
> (generally)
> on a cemetery. A mortuary is for storing corpses, that's often
> associated to this kind of ceremonial place, but not necessarily.
>
Looking around my local
sent from a phone
> On 19. Aug 2020, at 14:00, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
> Looking around my local area these have simply been mapped as
> amenity=crematorium.
i.e. they have not been mapped yet :)
a crematorium implies a place to burn dead people or animals, but has no
implications on the
sent from a phone
>> On 19. Aug 2020, at 15:33, woll...@posteo.de wrote:
> I could imagine rare cases of a privately run cemetery not linked to any
> religion or belief/life stance and where there is such a building. But
> typically, they would be public.
let me rephrase my question: how
In the US, there are privately owned cemeteries, often with a private
funeral home / mortuary building on the site. You can buy a plot and also
pay for the funeral services, including the use of a hall for a viewing,
reception or funeral service (religious or otherwise).
E.g.:
With respect to the proposed key, I would invite you to consider an
alternative way of tagging this function.
In various countries and in various religions the approaches on how to say
good-bye to the dead are different.
I am thinking of the "camera ardente" in Italy or the "Aufbahrung" in
I'm completely open to suggestions in this regard. I took the key I've
already seen used by some, but if someone comes up with a better idea,
great.
Am 19.08.2020 18:37 schrieb Volker Schmidt:
With respect to the proposed key, I would invite you to consider an
alternative way of tagging this
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 11:58, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>> >>> On 19. Aug 2020, at 15:33, woll...@posteo.de wrote:
>> >> I could imagine rare cases of a privately run cemetery not linked to
>> >> any religion or belief/life stance and where there is such a building.
>> >> But typically, they would
I'm not familiar with such privately owned cemeteries, so others may be
better placed.
Here are my thoughts from what you write:
If there is a crematorium, as I already wrote, I think it's pointless to
add such a new tag, because a room like that would probably go with any
crematorium anyhow
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 20:32, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
> I would not expect this to be something my hairdresser would deal with.
>
You saying that just jogged a memory loose from deep down inside somewhere!
Quite a few years ago now, one of the girls I worked with, also ran a
part-time job as a
I feel that the actual tags for implicit limits are less important than the
accuracy of the information. From surveys, in different countries (but clearly
random samples and no systematic research), it’s not super rare to find
implicit limits tagged where there are (lower) signed speed limits
Hey guys,
I just wanted to inform you that unfortunately, StreetComplete will not
offer a re-survey for speed limits in the upcoming "Map Maintenance with
StreetComplete" feature but probably never anyway.
Short explanation: It is impossible to implement a re-survey without
creating conflict
sent from a phone
> On 19. Aug 2020, at 10:23, woll...@posteo.de wrote:
>
> Indeed, this is not about a business, but a public facility
must the facility be “public” or could it be a private facility as well?
Cheers Martin
___
Tagging mailing
On Sat, 2020-08-15 at 22:13 +0200, Lisbeth Salander wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Paul Allen
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Yeah, we try to avoid putting two top-level tags on the
> > same object because
> > of nasal demons:
> >
21 matches
Mail list logo
