[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Fire Service Inlet

2023-02-10 Thread Kyle Hensel
Hi, voting has started for Fire Service Inlet https://wiki.osm.org/Proposal_features/Building_inlet ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] drones

2023-02-10 Thread stevea
I'm not saying a key like drone=* (as a "verb," like "to drone here, whether or not...?") is or isn't a good fit for OSM. I am wondering if it is a good fit, I honestly don't know. The number of

Re: [Tagging] drones

2023-02-10 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
Here are the Australian rules: https://www.casa.gov.au/knowyourdrone/drone-rules They're more a matter of saying No, you can't, rather than Yes, you can! I don't think that it would work in OSM? Thanks Graeme On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 at 04:10, Craig Wallace wrote: > On 2023-02-10 11:43,

Re: [Tagging] drones

2023-02-10 Thread stevea
There are also perhaps-related endeavors like ODM on mapscaping.com [1], at least one related video [2], a software repository [3], a cloud-based imagery-processing app [4], Site Scan for ArcGIS [5] and more, including people who have created businesses to provide "drone services" like flyovers

[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - showground (2)

2023-02-10 Thread Alexander Kane
The proposal for a new tag `amenity=showground` is now open for comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/showground_(2) This proposal attempts to fill a void for facilities which are essentially an open field to host event (typically with tents, temporary attractions, etc)

[Tagging] drones

2023-02-10 Thread Anne-Karoline Distel
What do people think about a key like drone? I'm thinking of heritage sites/ tourist attractions, of course. I noticed on a Welsh heritage site that they had an icon for all the amenities and permissions, and they had one for "Drones not allowed". Obviously, we could add drone=no to every airport

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - landcover proposal V2

2023-02-10 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Or to be more specific solved problems, if any, are much smaller than size of change of longstanding tagging practices. Deprecation of old-style multipolygons was also change of "longstanding tagging practices" but much smaller in scope and with much greater benefits. I listed some obvious

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - landcover proposal V2

2023-02-10 Thread Brian M. Sperlongano
This is a change to longstanding tagging practices and is therefore dead on arrival. On Fri, Feb 10, 2023, 11:33 AM Cartographer10 via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > Tjuro and I started a proposal to formalize the usage of `landcover=*`. > The proposal is now open for feedback >

[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - landcover proposal V2

2023-02-10 Thread Cartographer10 via Tagging
Tjuro and I started a proposal to formalize the usage of `landcover=*`. The proposal is now open for feedback https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landcover_proposal_V2 Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page. Kind regards,

Re: [Tagging] drones

2023-02-10 Thread Craig Wallace
On 2023-02-10 11:43, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: What do people think about a key like drone? I'm thinking of heritage sites/ tourist attractions, of course. I noticed on a Welsh heritage site that they had an icon for all the amenities and permissions, and they had one for "Drones not

Re: [Tagging] drones

2023-02-10 Thread Lukas-458
Hmm, well, I don't know, I guess there will be specific laws in each country about where you are allowed and aren't allowed to fly drones, right?   Well, if it is explicitly signposted as not allowed, you could of course map it, but only where it really says so on site, I think.   -- Lukas