Re: [Tagging] Adding mapillary tags to every building

> I almost never found a photo of something I was looking for with OsmAnd's > "close by Mapillary photos" I agree I realise this thread was initially about buildings but when I’m using OsmAnd to find, for example, a public transport ticket machine at an airport, I want to see a photo of the mac

Re: [Tagging] Central European insight needed: cukrászda, cukrárna, cukiernia, ciastkarnia, cukráreň, pasticceria, konditorei, patisserie, ...

Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone > On 28 Jun 2020, at 19:22, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >  > > > sent from a phone > >>> On 28. Jun 2020, at 17:11, Paul Allen wrote: >>> >> Some cafes in the UK lack table service. Maybe somebody brings your >> order over after you've placed your order

Re: [Tagging] Central European insight needed: cukrászda, cukrárna, cukiernia, ciastkarnia, cukráreň, pasticceria, konditorei, patisserie, ...

I’ve never heard anyone refer to McDonalds as a cafe. Although they do have some standalone McCafe locations https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCafé Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone > On 28 Jun 2020, at 22:14, Paul Allen wrote: > >  >> On Sun, 28 Jun 2020 at 21:06, Jarek Piórkowski wrote: >

Re: [Tagging] Central European insight needed: cukrászda, cukrárna, cukiernia, ciastkarnia, cukráreň, pasticceria, konditorei, patisserie, ...

While it might be used in Paul’s area, McDonalds is not a cafe where I am from, and would put money on most British people calling it a fast food restaurant Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone > On 29 Jun 2020, at 12:56, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >  > > sent from a phone > >> On 29. Jun 2020

[Tagging] Specialty Coffee

‘Specialty coffee is a term for the highest grade of coffee available, typically relating to the entire supply chain, using single origin or single estate coffee[1][2]. The term was first used in 1974 by Erna Knutsen in an issue of Tea & Coffee Trade Journal. Knutsen used specialty coffee to des

Re: [Tagging] Specialty Coffee

> On 8 Jul 2020, at 13:08, Paul Allen wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 13:00, Niels Elgaard Larsen <mailto:elga...@agol.dk>> wrote: > Jake Edmonds via Tagging: > > ‘Specialty coffee is a term for the highest grade of coffee available, > > Specialty coffee is

Re: [Tagging] Specialty Coffee

> On 8 Jul 2020, at 12:58, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote: > > Jake Edmonds via Tagging: >> ‘Specialty coffee is a term for the highest grade of coffee available, > > > microbrewery beer is not necessarily special or better. It is made on the > premises. Of

Re: [Tagging] Specialty Coffee

> On 8 Jul 2020, at 14:01, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote: > > Jake Edmonds via Tagging: > >> Maybe that’s true but if people are looking for it, it should be searchable? > > Then we need something objective. > Maybe coffee_species or coffee_brand > in the same

Re: [Tagging] Specialty Coffee

Sorry Graeme, that should have said American style, where the waitress is refilling mugs from a carafe Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone > On 8 Jul 2020, at 23:04, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > >  > > > > On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 19:22, Jake Edmonds via Tagging >

[Tagging] Canopy Walkways

I can’t find any references to canopy walkways in the wiki or on Taginfo. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canopy_walkway https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Canopy_walkways Current

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

I couldn’t call a boardwalk a bridge either, but it’s used as a bridge value > On 21 Aug 2020, at 09:14, Peter Elderson wrote: > > footway on bridge construction, so highway=footway, bridge=yes seems ok. > > Canopy walkway is the term I see used everywhere, not canopy bridge. > > Makes sense

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

Should the key be bridge? I feel like canopy walkways are more like bridges than boardwalks. Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone > On 22 Aug 2020, at 11:08, Alan Mackie wrote: > >  > > >> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, 21:46 Martin Koppenhoefer, >> wrote: >> >> >> sent from a phone >> >> > On 21. Au

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

u render > all footways, but unnecessary when you render canopy_walkways specifically. > > > Best Peter Elderson > > > Op za 22 aug. 2020 om 11:16 schreef Jake Edmonds via Tagging > : >> Should the key be bridge? >> I feel like canopy walkways are more lik

Re: [Tagging] Tagging multiple images on one object

I feel like those examples (city gates and fountains) would be appropriate places to use a wikimedia category. Assuming the drinking fountains are unique, if not then do they need multiple photos? Thanks Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone > On 26 Aug 2020, at 14:29, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:

Re: [Tagging] Tagging multiple images on one object

eason why I would always archive.org images I'd put on > Commons probably > > Cheers, > Thibault > >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020, 14:45 Jake Edmonds via Tagging >> wrote: >> I feel like those examples (city gates and fountains) would be appropriate >&g

Re: [Tagging] Tagging multiple images on one object

loading these to OpenStreetCam, Mapillary or whatever >>> comes after OSM migrates away from that one? >>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:37 PM Martin Koppenhoefer >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> sent from a phone &g

[Tagging] Powerbank Sharing Systems

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Powerbank-sharing_systems_by_name https://heychimpy.com https://www.wecharge.me I can’t see any tagging related to power

Re: [Tagging] Powerbank Sharing Systems

> On 19 Sep 2020, at 13:26, Andy Townsend wrote: > > On 19/09/2020 11:59, Jake Edmonds via Tagging wrote: >> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Powerbank-sharing_systems_by_name >> >> https://heychimpy.com >> https://www.wecharge.me >> &g

Re: [Tagging] Powerbank Sharing Systems

Understood Andy, thanks for the suggestions > On 19 Sep 2020, at 14:10, Andy Townsend wrote: > > On 19/09/2020 12:47, Jake Edmonds via Tagging wrote: >> Maybe a proposal that needs voting on isn’t need but is it accepted to add >> things to the wiki without one? >

[Tagging] leisure=firepit vs fireplace=Yes

In the woods around my area, there are many fire pits and picnic tables. Around 25% of the fire pits are tagged as their own object with leisure=firepit and the other 75% are additionally tagged as fireplace=yes on an amenity=shelter/shelter=picnic_shelter, tourism=picnic_site or leisure=picni

[Tagging] amenity=vending_machine/vending=bottle_return - brand:

Some bottle return vending machines only accept bottles of a particular beverage brand. Of the existing 137 bottle return nodes, none specify if there are any restrictions of which brands of bottles can be returned. I would like to propose using brand= but wanted to check if there were any o

[Tagging] amenity=vending_machine/vending=bottle_return - operator=

Some bottle return vending machines are placed inside supermarket stores and give the user a discount coupon to redeem in-store when paying for their shopping. The supermarket chain may not own, empty or maintain the machine but it appears operator=* is already being used for this case. Should w

Re: [Tagging] amenity=vending_machine/vending=bottle_return - brand:

ttles, but still offer a (small) discount when they > are returned. Finding a tagging scheme to fit the whole world requires > extensive analysis of as many different perspectives as possible. > > > > >> On 2020-01-05 13:15, Jake Edmonds via Tagging wrote: >> >&

Re: [Tagging] amenity=vending_machine/vending=bottle_return - operator=

Regardless of whether the main tag should be changed or not, on second thought, I think the following tags should be used: brand= To indicate how the service is branded, for example, a recycling/bottle return company or the name of the super market where the machine is located https://c

[Tagging] Fwd: amenity=vending_machine/vending=bottle_return - operator=

=vending_machine vending=reverse_vending (or keep bottle_return as its already in use) recycling:glass_bottles=yes/no (already is use) recycling:=yes/no Plus another optional tag to dictate which brands the machine takes Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: Jake Edm

Re: [Tagging] leisure=firepit vs fireplace=Yes

> Note that it may mean that wiki is incomplete and should be edited. Understood, but I wanted to get some other opinions before making any changes > On 6 Jan 2020, at 12:18, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > > > > 4 Jan 2020, 18:30 by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > The pages for leisure=picnic_tab

Re: [Tagging] amenity=vending_machine/vending=bottle_return - operator=

Is the different between recycling and reusing important for the average consumer who a) wants to claim their deposit and b) doesn’t want to put the item into landfill? Even schemes designed to reused containers have a limit on the number of reuses, the container I return might be on it’s fir

Re: [Tagging] amenity=vending_machine/vending=bottle_return - operator=

Here is the list of brands accepted at three stores near by. I also checked two others, one had a picture of various shapes and colours (with no labels) of bottles and the other lists ‘beer 0,33l, beer 0,5l) but both did have a list of which brands of plastic crates are accepted Fresh Fresh 2

Re: [Tagging] amenity=vending_machine/vending=bottle_return - operator=

Do you have a suggestion Martin? Maybe something like deposit_refund_system=yes could be applied to amenity=recycling, amenity=shop and amenity=vending_machine + vending=reverse_vending. deposit_refund_system:brands=* can specify the brands > On 13 Jan 2020, at 07:54, Martin Koppenhoefer wr

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Free Water for cafés, bars, restaurant

I’m in support of something. Did you speak to Refill about sharing data? I emailed them some time back but never received a response Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone > On 13 Jan 2020, at 10:20, European Water Project > wrote: > >  > Dear All, > > I thought this subject could wait, but it

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Free Water for cafés, bars, restaurant

I’ve heard of places not refilling water bottles due to hygiene reasons (whether that is a concern or not is a separate discussion) but will give a glass of water to whoever asks. And on the opposite side, there are places that will refill bottles but won’t give a glass a water. > On 13 Jan 202

Re: [Tagging] amenity=vending_machine/vending=bottle_return - operator=

I believe they are schemes where other items also have a deposit, such as newspapers. So rather then container_return, how about: deposit_return_scheme=yes deposit_return_scheme:type=counter/machine These tags can be added to shops, breweries, recycling centres, etc. Reverse vending machines c

Re: [Tagging] amenity=vending_machine/vending=bottle_return - operator=

n_scheme=yes > > This is trying to include too many things under one tag. > > - Joseph Eisenberg > > On 1/14/20, Jake Edmonds via Tagging wrote: >> I believe they are schemes where other items also have a deposit, such as >> newspapers. So rather then container_retur

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - drinking_water:refill_scheme

Hi Stuart, Can you clarify drinking_water:refill_scheme=multiple? I assume it should look like drinking_water:refill_scheme=refillscheme1;refillescheme2;refillscheme3 using the semicolon to separate each value? Thanks Jake > On 4 Feb 2020, at 09:06, European Water Project > wrote: > > > H

Re: [Tagging] How to tag an utilitarian fountain?

The wiki page for drinking fountain suggests they may be supplied by free flowing water or by a tap. What cases are you referring to? Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone > On 6 Feb 2020, at 17:04, Paul Allen wrote: > >  >> On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 15:50, European Water Project >> wrote: >> > >

Re: [Tagging] Proposal drinking_water:refill:fee

Is it worth adding drinking_water:refill:carbonated=yes/no, drinking_water:refill:chilled=yes/no and drinking_water:refill:alkaline=yes/no, etc (or drinking_water:refill:types=carbonated/chilled/alkaline). Then fee can be based on which types of water is charged for? Personally I can’t see myse

Re: [Tagging] Country-specific images for tags

It’s not obvious how this works (at least to me). At first I assumed the gallery pulled images from Wikidata but the Wikidata page doesn’t have those images listed. > On 13 Apr 2020, at 14:16, Andrew Hain wrote: > > One feature of the OSM wiki data items that has seen little use so far is the

Re: [Tagging] Reviving the path discussion - the increasing importance of trails in OSM

I’m going to throw this in rather randomly but the reason i don’t tag width and surface is that the footpaths I’m mapping vary widely. Getting wider and thinner and going from gravel to dirt to sections with many trees roots. Plus the surface tag is rather subjective. Sent from Jake Edmonds' i