> The fact that the image is linked to an osm node is enough reason for the > image to be online.
Sorry, I meant that images of generic drinking fountains can go in ‘Drinking fountains in <location>’ and only need one image linked to the node. A unique fountain deserves its own category Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone > On 26 Aug 2020, at 14:53, Thibault Molleman <thibaultmolle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> Can you link photos/deletion requests? > Again, don't bother with that. I was 13, didn't know what I was doing, main > reason why they were deleted according to the deletion requests were because > they didn't have a license attached to them, so they didn't know if it was > even allowed on there. (wouldn't happen with todays upload wizard) > >> Assuming the drinking fountains are unique > > I feel like it just shouldn't matter if they are unique. We shouldn't have to > justify why an image is important. > The fact that the image is linked to an osm node is enough reason for the > image to be online. But the problem is that Wikimedia wouldn't care for such > a reason. > So that is the reason why I would always archive.org images I'd put on > Commons probably > > Cheers, > Thibault > >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020, 14:45 Jake Edmonds via Tagging >> <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: >> I feel like those examples (city gates and fountains) would be appropriate >> places to use a wikimedia category. >> >> Assuming the drinking fountains are unique, if not then do they need >> multiple photos? >> >> >> Thanks >> Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone >> >> > On 26 Aug 2020, at 14:29, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > sent from a phone >> > >> >> On 26. Aug 2020, at 12:18, bkil <bkil.hu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> there is usually no need for more than one image on a POI >> > >> > >> > I have recently tagged some city gates and both sides would have been >> > interesting. The other kind of POI I am frequently taking photos are >> > fountains and drinking fountains, where indeed a single foto is completely >> > sufficient in almost all cases. It’s not generally answerable. >> > >> > Cheers Martin >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Tagging mailing list >> > Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
