> As an alternative, why not get rid of the contact:* versions since mostpeople are not using them?I tried this in the first round and people rejected it with the reason that this is the newer one which should be used~ Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram Original Message Subject: Re:
> - because too much use (saying that a problem that's too big doesn't need to be solved is pretty absurd).A mechanical edit could convert them to their respective `contact:` subkey sisters and solves that big problem. Also editor and customers changing their presets is not that difficult because
I didn't heard any good reason why not to change to `contact:` scheme.~ Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram Original Message Subject: Re: [Tagging] Remove non-prefixed versions of 'contact:' schemeFrom: Marc Gemis To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" CC: Are you planning
Hey,I am a "data customer", see https://babykarte.OpenStreetMap.de . That's why I initiated this discussion because this is important for me. But mappers are not listening to data customers and think they know how a database works (only few of them know that and those come from a technical
> Quitting the EU if you don't like it is much easier thanseceding from a country.I don't follow this reasoning since some people will always leave their country behind and begin a new life somewhere else. That was just how the US was founded, founded by ones from Europe mostly who broke up with
tools" CC: Am Mo., 4. Mai 2020 um 17:46 Uhr schrieb Sören alias Valor Naram <valin...@gmx.net>:> because some will feel that A and contact:A are not the same thingWell, the specification says that they are the same thing by mentioning both are used to tag contact information. If they're
