On 2015-01-26 01:39, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
On 25.01.2015 23:30, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
On 1/26/15, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com wrote:
And I think it makes sense to define explicitly some things in the
documentation. Things like
– use always (or use never) “Saint”: “Saint Paul”
Hi,
is there a tag to express that the use of electronic cigarettes is
permitted at a location? If not I'd like to suggest the use ecigarette=*
or vaporizing=* with the same values as smoking=*.
Opinions?
Thorsten
___
Tagging mailing list
I stumbled upon it a few weeks ago. In a restaurant were smoking is only
allowed outdoors vaporizing is allowed indoors. I asked in a few other
restaurants and it's the same there.
On 2015-04-21 22:47, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
On 21/04/2015, Thorsten Alge li...@thorsten-alge.de wrote
However just repeating the smoking tagging scheme can cover all cases
the smoking tag does:
smoking=no
vaporizing=no
vaporizing:outside=separated
smoking:outside=no
Remember there's no need to tag something that's already a legal
restriction (such as the
area I live in which
I fear at this stage we can only agree to disagree : to me using
e-cigarettes *is* smoking. I don't care much for the physicist's
definition of smoke. It's the social/medical definition that matters
here, the one that gets turned into laws and ultimately into osm tags.
No offence but it is
Hallo List,
I started mapping wikidata tags some time ago. Those are great because
you can find wikipedia articles in any language you want (not only the
'primary' language) and and plenty of other information which might be
interesting for your project.
Since wikidata will be the center of all
It must not be more difficult for a novice if the editor supports
fetching the wikidata item when a wikipedia-tag is present.
On 2015-05-25 14:40, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 25 May 2015 at 13:18, Thorsten Alge li...@thorsten-alge.de wrote:
Since wikidata will be the center of all Wikimedia wikis
Ok, No.
Having the wikidata-tag enables an application to select the
wikipedia-article in the language of the users choice or to easily load
additional information from wikidata like a cities crest for displaying.
The advantage would be that a user wouldn't get the German article
because its a
Well thats a good point. But in my opinion thats where the editor should
support the mapper and load the Description from Wikidata and maybe a
list of available languages for wikipedia articles.
I think a lot of us mappers are going to need a lot of convincing,
wikipedia tags, in common with
I'm not shure what it way you wanted to prove with these links. All of
these articles have wikidata items linked to them. All new articles get
wikidata items short after creation. Have a look in the left sidebar.
Since wikipedia migrated the interwikilinks (the link which are
connecting the
> "This image doesn’t exist, has been hidden or is part of a private
> project."
>
> Phil (trigpoint)
tested it with another browser and it works.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
It's about a cabinat with a defibrillator in it and a button on it to
call 112 as you can see here:
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/gmiQ8jjpqs9LqbQnXJe-_A/photo
At the moment I'm mapping it with two nodes. One emergency=phone and one
emergency=defibrillator.
On 2016-02-06 18:22, Martin
Hi Folks,
what is considered the best way to map a defibrillator which is combined
with an emergency phone?
* Two nodes, one as emergency=phone the other as emergency=defibrillator
* emergency=phone;defibrillator
Or something else?
Regards
Thorsten
Hi,
I was wondering about the tagging for recycling containers. In Germany
they have defined times in which it is allowed to use them to prevent
noise pollution.
Often the opening_hours-tag is used for that. Sometimes also
service_times and in some cases collection_times which is for another
On 2016-03-27 18:44, Éric Gillet wrote:
> 2016-03-27 17:20 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Alge <li...@thorsten-alge.de
> <mailto:li...@thorsten-alge.de>>:
>
> I was wondering about the tagging for recycling containers. In Germany
> they have defined times in whic
fit best.
On 2017-03-11 18:29, Philip Barnes wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-03-11 at 18:20 +0100, Thorsten Alge wrote:
>> Yes, I think that would be good.
>
> Organic would seem a bit specific and imply you can only take waste
> there if it is organic, i.e. never use week killer, you
Yes, I think that would be good.
On 2017-03-11 18:16, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Thorsten Alge <li...@thorsten-alge.de
> <mailto:li...@thorsten-alge.de>> wrote:
>
>
> Well, to tag the supervision it would be ok. But how shall small p
> Dump is the wrong word. In this context it is an American word, rather
> than British, but my understanding of it is that it is where rubbish is
> dumped rather than recycled.
>
> The normal term is non-recyclable, but that does not mean landfill. It
> could equally be incinerated.
>
> If you
Hi,
there are two type of recycling, container and centre. For a landfill
one can tag a closed way with landuse=landfill. But for smaller,
unsupervised dumps (e.g. for green and garden waste) a node tagged with
amenity=recycling & recycling_type=dump would be better in my opinion.
What do others
19 matches
Mail list logo
