Le 16/06/2010 07:17, Stephen Hope a écrit :
I'm a little bit worried about using admin_level, as it has
connotations of control, not just level. It could be misinterpreted
as who controls an airfield, rather than how important it is.
What you're trying to do here is give a renderer explicit
Le 25/06/2010 14:04, y...@o2.pl a écrit :
Now there is a good trend to use colon in key names. Maybe we should
move these tags below?
int_name - name:international
nat_name - name:national
reg_name - name:regional
loc_name - name:local
old_name - name:old
alt_name - name:alt or
Le 27/06/2010 14:25, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
soccer in US and Canada and football everywhere else.
-1, AFAIK we use soccer in Germany, Italy and probably elsewhere,
while football refers to american football (looking at the icons,
preset icons, etc.).
Cheers,
Martin
I thought
Le 02/07/2010 18:44, John Smith a écrit :
On 2 July 2010 23:55, Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com wrote:
What other links are there?
The wiki is full of links between pages, until I actually read the
page I didn't realise you were talking about highway links.
+1, I thought it
Le 07/07/2010 20:50, John Smith a écrit :
On 8 July 2010 04:15, M∡rtin Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Recently I found that we have no documented tags for abbeys,
monasteries, shrines. Do you think it would be better to put them into
amenity as subtags of place of worship or
On 10/08/2010 03:13, Liz wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Steve Bennett wrote:
Wish there was an agriculture=* tag. Life could be simple:
well living in an agricultural area
I'd start with
agriculture=
agriculture=* is not very acurate
Does it describe the use of the soil, the
On 15/08/2010 17:54, John Smith wrote:
On 16 August 2010 01:43, Cartinuscarti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
With landuse=mixed you basically know nothing, except that there should be
multiple values. You don't even know if it is a build-up area as there are
enough landuse values that deal with the
On 15/08/2010 18:54, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
didn't you use a subtag for continuous/discontinuous? Could have been helpful.
We have put the CLC:code tag in all polygons imported, so it is easy to
find them back.
But no sub tag.
For the polygons are often been modifyed from import, we
On 16/08/2010 16:31, Matthias Meißer wrote:
Hi everybody,
as I noted in my diary, the forums,...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/!i!/diary/11477
I would like to improve the features page and other wiki pages around.
Therefore I asked at the talk page
On 17/08/2010 12:59, Tom Chance wrote:
Just to help summarise, with these proposals we end up with:
power=generator (the starting point)
power_rating (to specify the watts generated)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:power_rating
power_source (to specify the fuel type / energy source)
On 17/08/2010 05:29, John Smith wrote:
On 17 August 2010 13:14, Michael Barabanovmichael.baraba...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree. But I'm not in the mood to start a voting process on changing
hour_on to access:time.
We keep getting told this is a do-ocracy, so if you find something
more
On 18/08/2010 01:17, John Smith wrote:
On 18 August 2010 08:25, Andreas Labresl...@lab.at wrote:
I can't follow your argument here. A dancing school (or is ist called dance
school? in which part of the English world?) is an amenity, is it not?
The term amenity, if used in the
On 01/09/2010 04:09, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know of any other feature where the direction of the way means
something *without* another tag being added.
natural=cliff, barrier=retaining wall
On 01/09/2010 12:08, David Paleino wrote:
So we settled that Relation:street, as proposed in [0], would be more suitable,
both for grouping segments together (yes Simone and Nathan, just for the sake
of it, because I think it's convenient to keep them logically together with a
relation), _AND_
On 22/09/2010 13:36, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Pierre-Alain Dorangepdora...@mac.com wrote:
With JOSM you can achieve that by drawing a way by clicking on the node
one by one. It will draw a new way using the same nodes.
That is okay for a couple nodes,
On 22/09/2010 14:17, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Vincent Pottiervpott...@gmail.com wrote:
on JOSM :
copy the way (ctr + C),
create a new layer (ctrl + N) and don't clic in it,
paste the way (ctrl + V) (the nodes are at the same place),
put the tags,
merge the
On 22/09/2010 14:14, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/9/22 Vincent Pottiervpott...@gmail.com:
yes. I use the 3d way (drawing 2 ways sharing nodes). I prefer this method
for the reason given : if the bank/flow changes, the border may not.
and you will be happily unglueing nodes till
On 27/09/2010 02:55, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 8:36 PM, SomeoneElse
li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 26/09/2010 23:35, vclaw wrote:
I have created a proposal for mapping social clubs, by tagging as
leisure=social_club.
See
On 29/09/2010 23:32, Dave F. wrote:
Hi
Anybody recommend a tag for a structure such as this?:
http://www.arenaseating.com/cm/images/products/image_sports_grandstand_3.jpg
sports=stadium is definitely overkill.
sports_stand; sports_seating?
Cheers
Dave F.
building=yes|* + (~)bench=yes
Hi,
Nearly a year that the the page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/heritage has been
started.
I'm not shure that it has been announced on this list.
They are allready some uses on the excellent tool :
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/keys/heritage
--
FrViPofm
On 23/10/2010 02:00, Alan Mintz wrote:
In most cities in the US, and even some smaller towns, there's an
organization called the Chamber of Commerce. With varying
participation from municipal government, it's a portal for new
businesses to come to for help and information, networking with
On 06/11/2010 12:39, Tom Chance wrote:
I like the idea of a culture key.
+1
For now, in the absence of that key, we have to decide whether these
features sit in amenity or tourism. The wiki makes the distinction by
saying that amenities are important and tourist features are other
Le 01/12/2010 13:41, Jean-Claude Repetto a écrit :
Hello,
Is there a tag for viewpoint indicators ?
Some photos :
http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/22489
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Viewpoint_indicator.jpg
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Table_d%27orientation.JPG
There is a
Le 06/01/2011 05:07, Steve Bennett a écrit :
Putting in place a serious process for tag migration will be
difficult. I suggest that a first step will be definition of an actual
schema, with version number. For example, define an actual list of
several hundred tags, with semantics, that
Le 06/01/2011 14:07, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) a écrit :
Conventionally this has been done with role alternate. But for more
complex problems (more then two variants) this can not be represented
correctly in OSM with only one route.
Currently under developement is a proposal
Le 11/01/2011 13:34, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
Looking up the wiki there are several proposals for protected / listed features.
1.
The oldest is this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/unesco_world_heritage
suggesting historic=unesco_world_heritage
actually I'd like to
Le 18/01/2011 20:41, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
2011/1/18 Robert Elsenaarrob...@elsenaar.info:
Great idea to reactivate is again. New times, new ideas.
I think capitals should be tagged to be Metropolis to also when they do not
have enough inhibitans to be granted as one.
-1, what is the
Le 23/05/2011 14:17, Craig Wallace a écrit :
On 23/05/2011 12:15, Andrew Chadwick (lists) wrote:
I'm suggesting that we remove the language on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden which recommends
leisure=garden for tagging private residential gardens. The talk page
entry is
Le 24/05/2011 10:39, Andrew Chadwick (lists) a écrit :
On 24/05/11 00:49, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
[...] the landuse values describing built-up space should usually not be
split below plot size.
I'll read that as another vote against small landuse plots, but again:
there's nothing in the
Le 01/06/2011 08:31, Andre Engels a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:00 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
looking at the available data and in the wiki I'm currently missing
some tags for monasteries.
All I found is this:
Le 26/08/2011 04:48, Bryce Nesbitt a écrit :
On 08/25/2011 05:39 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
if the data is mastered elsewhere, don't import it into OSM.
If OSM is just a unique repository of hand collected data, sure,
that's right.
If OSM is an end result (e.g. published maps) then we
Le 22/10/2011 21:30, John Sturdy a écrit :
I get the impression that amenity is something people use directly,
and that this should be man_made=septic_tank as it is a piece of
behind-the-scenes equipment. What's connected to it might well be
amenity=toilets, however.
__John
+1
Le 22/10/2011
Le 06/12/2011 10:43, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
2011/12/6 Jowinfi...@gmail.com:
I'd use a polygon (amenity=hotel, etc.) for the whole complex, this
can be easily evaluated, (what nobody does so far with site relations,
AFAIK)
I get complaints if I start using polygons that way...
what
Le 12/12/2011 17:45, pavithran a écrit :
Office = government , office=research_centre and lot of important
tags will bring us out of amenity .
What would improve a large scale usage of office key ?
Inclusion in potlatch/JOSM perhaps ?
Regards,
Pavithran
Le 09/01/2012 11:31, Volker Schmidt a écrit :
I would like to tag a historic dovecot (colombara or torre colombaia
in Italian).
I cannot find an appropriate existing tag.
Volker
Padova, Italy
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=dovecote
--
FrViPofm
Le 03/03/2012 08:49, Erik Johansson a écrit :
There is nothing separating this road yet it is mapped as two ways:
http://osm.org/go/0bCzcBhNM--?m
http://goo.gl/KLTpu (Streetview)
IMHO, it's a mistake.
This is done for routers. Imagine you want to go from the marker to
number 117, as it is
Le 13/04/2012 09:49, Nathan Edgars II a écrit :
I think we're talking about two different things here.
(a) An editor (program) automatically applying tags to an object. This
is bad, because we don't know whether the mapper has specifically
verified this, or whether it's just being assumed and
Le 15/04/2012 10:10, Nathan Edgars II a écrit :
On 4/15/2012 3:55 AM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-04-14 22:10, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
In the U.S., a gated residential community usually allows anyone in
who has a legitimate reason to be there (e.g. visiting a friend,
delivering a package,
Le 05/08/2012 09:56, Tobias Knerr a écrit :
The particular bench in your example could also be modelled as a node
with direction and width tags.
Nevertheless, one could argue that long benches like this one
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Universitaet_Passau_09.jpg
would best be mapped
Le 21/08/2012 13:04, Colin Smale a écrit :
I live in hope that, one day, we might have documented defaults or
implied values per territory. Until that time, we may have to map both
the tangible artefact (solid line) and the implications for routing
(no u-turns etc.) separately. They are
doing the work ?
--
Vincent Pottier aka FrViPofm
and sorry for the noise made by the same post with an other account.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Le 02/06/2013 14:31, Brad Neuhauser a écrit :
Umm, what's wrong with shop=bakery?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shop
Selling bread
In France you can usualy find pastries in a bakery, at least
viennoiseries [1], but you never find bread in a pastry.
[1]
Le 03/06/2013 04:59, Brad Neuhauser a écrit :
To me, wikipedia captures well the English usage of bakery:
A *bakery* (or *baker's shop*) is an establishment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Establishment which produces and sells
flour http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flour-based food baked
Le 03/07/2013 05:46, Felix Delattre a écrit :
Dear community,
please vote for this feature proposal:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/reference_point
This is needed to get proper route-planning working in all Central
American countries.
Thank you for all the feedback
Le 08/10/2013 10:21, Pieren a écrit :
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
Er, what?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
+1, that's exactly the reason. A building is not the same feature as the
business occupying it.
Cool down, Martin. Amenity (or
Le 11/12/2013 11:15, Malcolm Herring a écrit :
It is not rather than, but as well as. The harbour object is
tagged with a list of *available* facilities, the tag values being
free text to qualify those availabilities. e.g. harbour:toilets
could take the value private, access by code.
I
Le 27/02/2014 07:18, Rudolf Martin a écrit :
Hallo,
the tag drinkable= is used more than 3000 times.
Up today there is no clear definition about the values of this tag.
I made a proposal with some possible values, according to some
discussions in this mailinglist and some threads in the osm
Le 27/02/2014 07:18, Rudolf Martin a écrit :
Hallo,
the tag drinkable= is used more than 3000 times.
Up today there is no clear definition about the values of this tag.
I made a proposal with some possible values, according to some
discussions in this mailinglist and some threads in the osm
Le 28/02/2014 01:23, Dave Swarthout a écrit :
@FrViPofm: I respectfully disagree. The drinking_water tag you refer
to is intended to indicate if drinking water is available at a certain
facility, not whether it is safe to drink. The values in your example
demonstrate this intention with yes
Le 11/04/2014 19:38, Dan S a écrit :
2014-04-11 18:20 GMT+01:00 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com wrote:
(2) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaccess%3Ddesignated
This is how I understood and have used it.
This is what the wiki
What a nice map we would get :
* way: addr:housenumber=1; my_tag=nothing_known_elsewhere; render=pink
* way: addr:housenumber=2; other_tag=known_only_by_me; render=yellow
* way: addr:housebumber=3; my_private_tag=dont_use_it; render=violet
* way: addr:housebumber=4;
Le 23/01/2015 21:53, moltonel 3x Combo a écrit :
Given that relations in general are not going away, the proper
solution to the novices have trouble with relations problem is not
to use less relations but to make relations easyer to edit and better
documented. FWIW, I feel there is slow but
Le 22/01/2015 14:00, althio a écrit :
Hi all - does anyone know what the geographic distribution of
associatedStreet is like? taginfo doesn't render a map (it seems it
doesn't do that for relations).
UK http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/tags/type=associatedStreet ~9000
PL
Le 27/01/2015 11:55, Daniel Koć a écrit :
W dniu 27.01.2015 11:25, André Pirard napisał(a):
On 2015-01-27 09:51, Simone Saviolo wrote :
To be correct, the Virgin Mary isn't a saint either ;-)
You should urgently warn the Vatican [3] ! ;-)
It doesn't really matter anyway. =} Someone has
Le 25/01/2015 13:00, Andreas Goss a écrit :
Fully borken or not. In my opinion a assiciatedstreet relation that
does not include every element is broken. At that point all the
advantages are gone.
associatedStreet is not multypolygon !
A lack in the outer of a multipolygon is a gap and
Le 25/01/2015 17:20, Steve Doerr a écrit :
In English, we often call this the 'dedication' of the church. This
can include things like Holy Cross (Sacré Cœur) which are obviously
not saints.
I would prefer the dedication rather than a patron, for, as said
above, the dedication may be a
56 matches
Mail list logo
