Hi Jo,
this IS a step backwards! please wait for the results of this discussion
before changing anything.
regards
walter aka wambacher
Am 10.03.2018 um 10:30 schrieb Jo:
I added many borders in Uganda a few years ago, they are gray in your
rendering. Should I go and put admin_level tags on
Hi dave,
Am 10.03.2018 um 18:04 schrieb Dave F:
How about boundary:administration=maritime (or something similar)?
about 97% of all 12010 maritim admin boundaries (boundaries not on any
land area) have been tagged with maritime=yes.
https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/snaps_2018/mariti
Hi,
Am 01.09.2017 um 00:54 schrieb Viking:
I think we should find a solution also for 10% of hydrants that don't have a
type/pressure/water_source, or we will never have a definitive solution.
Considering that in some countries pressurized hydrants are not
distuinguishable from not pressurized
Hi frederik
(Thankfully nobody has started to actually add embassies to a country's
boundary relation yet. Not that I know of anyway.)
Is it a common practice to add boundary=administrative to embassies?
Does it make sense?
i don't hope so. In germany i know, that the area of an ebassy is NOT a
Hi (hallo) Martin,
in Osm there are 94790 amenity=shelter and 1 (one) emergency=shelter.
(Nodes only, may be some more ways).
I think, you won't change that ;)
Am 07.09.2017 um 09:54 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
I would use "emergency" as the "main" key.
Cheers,
Martin
_
Am 30.09.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Viking:
According to the huge number of affected nodes (~300k for
fire_hydrant:position=*). I'm afraid that a lot of voters will oppose
the proposal due to the huge impact of it. In this case we would also not have
the well
discussed new tags and need to start a ne
