Re: [Tagging] exit_to on motorway_junction

Johan C wrote on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 19:08:21 +0100: [...] Unfortunately, exit_to is not documented. The destination in my opinion has same purpose as exit_to, but is a better choice because you can use it on both outgoing parts of the Y-branch and because you can use in in conjunction with

Re: [Tagging] exit_to on motorway_junction

Colin Smale wrote on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:26:51 +0100: Phil, there's a difference between routing calculation (which neither knows nor cares about road names, numbers, signposts etc) and how the result of the calculation is presented to the user. Then you need to relate the nodes/edges in the

[Tagging] RFC winter_service

Only quite some time after using winter_service I found other tags regarding (parts of) the same issue. To document this and make it possible to unify the tagging I created this proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:winter_service regards, malenki

Re: [Tagging] New childcare proposal

Am Tue, 16 Apr 2013 23:16:39 +0200 schrieb def onion defon...@googlemail.com: I kindly request your comments about this proposal - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare2.0 My first thought: What about orphanages and facilities alike? Regards malenki

Re: [Tagging] New childcare proposal (malenki)

def onion wrote on Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:12:48 +0200: Your right, orphanages are a kind of childcare facilities as well. From my point of view they are more of a long term service and i would put them to the social failities. But perhaps its a good idea to view the childcare tag under a broader

Re: [Tagging] New childcare proposal (malenki)

John F. Eldredge wrote on Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:48:16 -0500: malenki o...@malenki.ch wrote: def onion wrote on Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:12:48 +0200: I don't know much about these social facilities in my country let alone others. I just know that the real orphanages where only orphans were

Re: [Tagging] waterway highway

Am Thu, 08 Aug 2013 02:13:38 +0200 schrieb André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com: Hi, The waterway=dam http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dam definition is all well but it doesn't give a damn about what runs on top ;-) Can I have waterway=dam highway=* ? You could map the dam as area

Re: [Tagging] shop=social_market ?

Am Sun, 22 Sep 2013 05:51:08 +0200 schrieb Andreas Labres l...@lab.at: Does social market make sense to native English speakers? I'm looking for tagging what is called in German: Sozialmarkt oder Sozialladen https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sozialmarkt_(Einzelhandel)

[Tagging] cleanup measurement_station / monitoring_station?

At the moment there exist: man_made=measurement_station man_made=monitoring_station Both for mapping the same kind of objects. After three years of coexisting there should be finally a cleanup A little about the history of the tags: The proposal for man_made=measurement_station was created on 2nd

[Tagging] man_made monitoring_station: start of voting on merged proposal

Voting on the announced merged proposal is open. (3.5 years should be sufficient for comments :) ) Link: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/monitoring_station ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Tags useful for rendering of roads in poor conditions

Am Tue, 31 Dec 2013 14:10:33 -0200 schrieb Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com: [rendering unpaved roads] The Brazilian community has shown interest on this many times, since lack of this feature causes unaware users to classify roads incorrectly. There are a lot of countries which

Re: [Tagging] Tags useful for rendering of roads in poor conditions

Am Tue, 31 Dec 2013 22:15:10 + schrieb Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl: On 31 December 2013 21:27, malenki o...@malenki.ch wrote: looking forward to that enhanced rendering style, What would be the most suitable rendering? Perhaps similar to the normal rendering

Re: [Tagging] Tags useful for rendering of roads in poor conditions

Am Tue, 31 Dec 2013 22:15:10 + schrieb Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl: [... (darn fat fingers and crazy working hours)] My biggest contribution to OSM is adding and checking data gn8 Thomas ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Tags useful for rendering of roads in poor conditions

Am Thu, 2 Jan 2014 16:57:35 + schrieb Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl: One thing I can think of is to introduce a new tag paved=yes I disagree. This is redundancy. I would recommend a list where values of surface= would be collected and either be classified as unpaved or paved if

Re: [Tagging] Tags useful for rendering of roads in poor conditions

Am Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:36:13 +0100 schrieb Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de: I know (without being able to show you photos or something like that) ways that are paved with paving stones (and thus clearly counted as paved), but due to tree roots below the way and so on are

Re: [Tagging] Tags useful for rendering of roads in poor conditions

Am Thu, 2 Jan 2014 08:15:14 -0800 (PST) schrieb gweber gwebe...@gmail.com: I would strongly favour a simple dashed border style whenever the surface tag falls into the unpaved categories. It is as simple as that. From my experience in driving on rural roads in Brazil, nothing else is

Re: [Tagging] Tags useful for rendering of roads in poor conditions

Am Fri, 3 Jan 2014 14:09:59 -0200 schrieb Gerald Weber gwebe...@gmail.com: malenki wrote Gerald Weber wrote So these two roads you'd consider the same?: http://www.malenki.ch/Touren/11/Galerie/Tag_20/slide_19.html (btw: sorry for me having been a little polemic) Based on the agreed

Re: [Tagging] Tags useful for rendering of roads in poor conditions

Fernando Trebien wrote on Fri, 3 Jan 2014 17:56:15 -0200: - people don't seem to agree on which tag to recommend overall to describe surface conditions: tracktype, or smoothness, or simply surface OSMers seem to agree that they need all of them. * Tracktype at least for more or less

Re: [Tagging] Tags useful for rendering of roads in poor conditions

Dave Swarthout wrote on Sat, 4 Jan 2014 08:26:53 +0700: Now that is a bad road, even though it's paved. Before reading anything in this thread I would have applied the tags surface=asphalt, surface_condition=rough_less_than_40 kph (used 1232 times). Nice talking but unsemantic tag Now, I'm

Re: [Tagging] Tags useful for rendering of roads in poor conditions

Fernando Trebien wrote on Sat, 4 Jan 2014 10:00:34 -0200: So, let me know if you disagree with this summary. Highway here excludes highway=track and highway=path. A highway is bad (significantly worse for most people than its best possible state) when it contains any of the following tags: -

Re: [Tagging] Tags useful for rendering of roads in poor conditions

Am Sat, 4 Jan 2014 11:25:50 -0200 schrieb Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com: On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 11:17 AM, malenki o...@malenki.ch wrote: I personally would exclude grade2 as definition for really bad highway For the rest I agree. Would you agree that it's potentially bad

Re: [Tagging] natural=cloud

Pierre Knobel wrote on Tue, 1 Apr 2014 19:08:01 +0200: I'm new on this mailing list, but I spend a few months already on the talk-fr list and I've been mapping for a while longer. I just wanted to mention a new tag I created yesterday: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcloud I

Re: [Tagging] cleanup broken import fix

Dan S wrote on Wed, 28 May 2014 21:57:46 +0100: If I understand right you should probably ask imports@ not tagging@ about making bulk edits, even if they're to fix bulk edits! I think you are right. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] convert imported natural=rock areas to bare_rock

On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 00:27:03 +0200, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: My proposal http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Drock_cleanup has been in RFC state for a year, and the only comment from other users was a personal message concerning the licence of my photos. When a

Re: [Tagging] Jewelry/jewellery shops

Am Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:33:55 +0100 schrieb Stephan Knauss : > On 13.01.2016 23:46, Matthijs Melissen wrote: > > We currently use British English for almost all OSM tags. Jewellery > > shops however are typically tagged with the American English variant > > shop=jewelry

Re: [Tagging] Jewelry/jewellery shops

Am Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:32:56 +1100 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > I note the tag was > never 'approved'. > has had some discussion on the spelling aspect Just a side note: I'd assume that most of the major tags like highway=* never got proposed nor voted on. And seeing that maybe 30