Fernando Trebien wrote on Sat, 4 Jan 2014 10:00:34 -0200: >So, let me know if you disagree with this summary. "Highway" here >excludes highway=track and highway=path. > >A highway is "bad" (significantly worse for most people than its best >possible state) when it contains any of the following tags: > >- tracktype=grade2/grade3/grade4/grade5 >- smoothness=bad/very_bad/horrible/very_horrible/impassable >- surface=ground/dirt/earth/sand/grass
I personally would exclude "grade2" as definition for "really bad highway" For the rest I agree. >A highway is also "potentially bad" (perhaps under bad weather) if it >contains surface=unpaved/gravel/fine_gravel/pebblestone/compacted. * Agree >A highway=residential/living_street/pedestrian/service/cycleway is >also "potentially bad" if it contains any of these other tags: > >- mtb:scale=1/2/3/4/5/6 >- sac_scale=T2/T3/T4/T5/T6 I personally doubt that mtb:scale and sac_scale should be used on living streets and such. >- wheelchair=no Agree _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
