Re: [Tagging] tagging the multipolygon model (was landuse and military)

. and/or not updating the wiki acordingly, giving the choice, mentionning that solution. We could let decide, but give clues about what's for what. -- sly Sylvain Letuffe li...@letuffe.org qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging

Re: [Tagging] tagging the multipolygon model (was landuse and military)

I want to know if I can reach the lake by transporting my boat through grass fields. ... -- sly Sylvain Letuffe li...@letuffe.org qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http

Re: [Tagging] tagging the multipolygon model (was landuse and military)

with it? Having a ground-cover tag would be perfect. What about every thing but boundary is ground-cover surface ? (I haven't checked the whole map features) -- sly Sylvain Letuffe li...@letuffe.org qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org ___ Tagging mailing

[Tagging] Proposed feature : World wide place=* standardisation only based on population

of the day : A geographic database records what is, a map is what we show of it By Larry Obvious -- sly Sylvain Letuffe li...@letuffe.org qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Proposed feature : World wide place=* standardisation only based on population

) before we consider the need of other tags in order to render correctly. -- sly Sylvain Letuffe sylv...@letuffe.org qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo

[Tagging] RFC - Via ferrata

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/via_ferrata -- sly Sylvain Letuffe li...@letuffe.org qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Free Flying (Hanggliding and Paragliding) - Voting Proposal

It hasn't been changed for a while, I'm moving it to voting period (in case we have paragliders out there, but any one is welcome to find bugs and/or things we forgot ) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/free_flying -- sly Sylvain Letuffe li...@letuffe.org qui suis-je

[Tagging] Proposal for a generic : type=multilinestring

Hi, I'd like your opinions on the following proposal : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multilinestring You are wellcome to discuss it either by replying to this email or by commenting on the wiki. I'm also willing that this proposal is used, as a first step, to replace

Re: [Tagging] Proposal for a generic : type=multilinestring

On jeudi 26 janvier 2012, LM_1 wrote: In the proposal it says: If you have one way making up the line string ring and it does not describe something in its own right, you may also put these tags on the relation and leave the relation untagged. - that does not really make sense to create such

[Tagging] RFC : Isolated buildings in mountain/wild used by hikers(/...) for shelter/sleeping/eating

Hi, The proposal : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/wilderness_mountain_buildings is re-opened for comments after 2 years of clean up -- sly qui suis-je : http://sly.letuffe.org email perso : sylvain chez letuffe un point org

[Tagging] Voting : Isolated buildings in mountain/wild used by hikers(/...) for shelter/sleeping/eating

Hi, After the huge clean up, improve and re-wording by rudof (thanks rudolf) the 4 proposals are open for a vote at : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Alpine_hut http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Wilderness_hut

[Tagging] Special geometry cases of the type=multipolygon relation

of such border cases ? -- sly (sylvain letuffe) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] dispute about how to tag a type=multipolygon relation

Hi, A recent proposal (and change after that) on the wiki has been made, which roughly sums up to : relations type=multipolygon's members should only be closed ways, not sums of ways making closed rings, unless the way is too big that it would be refused by the API Full discussion is here :

Re: [Tagging] dispute about how to tag a type=multipolygon relation

Let me first point out that these edits don't affect the definition of the multipolygon relation per se. No relation would become invalid, so this doesn't break anything. To be honnest, by what I read of the change, it wasn't so obvious. When reading : Use multipolygons only if there is no

Re: [Tagging] Naming boundary ways

I had assumed it was constructed differently but maybe it isn't. ok It might, but if it does, it shouldn't as it would be an error as far as what we have documented for it is concerned. But since one french contributor has decided against all others's will and local practices to change as he

Re: [Tagging] Seasonnal roads

On mercredi 10 octobre 2012, Rob Nickerson wrote: * For more details see [1]** and [2]. Essentially there is a hierarchy of subcategories for** transportation modes.** [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Access_hierarchy_simple.png* This scheme should be more wildly used. It seems to

Re: [Tagging] Seasonnal roads

On mercredi 10 octobre 2012, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: long ago : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Any_moving_thing_grouping_system but it should be mentioned that this diagram (unlike the previously posted one) is not in line with the current access model in OSM.

Re: [Tagging] Naming boundary ways - the — separation character

Q1e2 : However I don't like using some strange caracters my keyboard does'nt have like — Strange you mention that. (...) Then I noticed that municipality names I wrote were being changed without discussing them and without warning. It turned out that those changes were made by a

Re: [Tagging] Naming boundary ways

You mean like this http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/111 When I suggested the route recursion solution (a too restrictive concept), I was replied (by some Frenchman) that it's impossible. Mmmm ? I would be interested to know who told you that. Such a solution was

[Tagging] What is and what isn't a valid type=multipolygon relation for osm ?

usefull I guess. What about splitting in two maybe : - what is considered valid/accepted from an OSM point of view - what is considered good practice/avoid if possible from a mapper/consumers point of view -- sly (sylvain letuffe) ___ Tagging mailing

[Tagging] Proposition about the place_name tag on place areas

Hi, I'd like your opininion of the following proposal : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/drop_recommendation_for_place_name -- sly qui suis-je : http://sly.letuffe.org email perso : sylvain chez letuffe un point org ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] agglomération

On mercredi 21 novembre 2012, A.Pirard.Papou wrote: Hi, Hi, OSM-talk-fr sounds like associating agglomération and speed limit. I don't think we do. A french agglomération implies some speed limits (bellow 50km/h) But speed limits doesn't imply you are in an agglomération. An agglomération

Re: [Tagging] agglomération

this relation What you are looking for is a category thing to group loose ways sharing a common property but relation weren't made for that : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories -- sly (sylvain letuffe) ___ Tagging mailing

[Tagging] [VOTE] stop recommending the use of place_name=* for place=* on areas

Hi, No more inputs for a while, do you want to vote for such a basic proposal ? (Many would probably have just changed the wiki, but the way of tagging it concern is hot topic, and I prefere to gather some idea before just doing it) :

Re: [Tagging] Escape_lane - Approved

On vendredi 23 novembre 2012, José Juan Sánchez del Arco wrote: Okay, as the proposed feature highway=escape has been approved, now it is time for clean_up. I have completely no idea how to do it, so... can anyone do that for me??

Re: [Tagging] Lifecycle concepts, REMOVED

Hi, dieterdreist wrote thank you all for your comments, user:RicoZ, the creator of that page also agreed and has changed the description. In fact, the creator of the above mentionned wiki page copy/pasted the page I originally created to document the removed: prefix here :

Re: [Tagging] Smoothness possible values, straw poll.

David Bannon-2 wrote 1. Numeric tags, perhaps grade1 .. grade8 similar to tracktype. For information, that proposition was created a few month after the smoothness acceptation to avoid using subjective sounding words like very_bad/bad/good :

Re: [Tagging] Tagging established, unofficial and wild campings

dieterdreist wrote Am 14.03.2015 um 05:41 schrieb John Willis lt; johnw@ gt;: and mapping them for other Trekkers would be useful only if they are not confused at all with all of the other, more substatial or easily accessed spots in a camp or along a road. +1, I believe the tag for

Re: [Tagging] Accepted or rejected?

Jan van Bekkum wrote It is amazing to see how few people participate in this discussion and vote compared to the number of mappers. I will only talk for myself : I'm very interested in the outcome of this specific discussion about tag proposals, and I did my best to make my way thru the 6

Re: [Tagging] [Imports] [OSM-talk] [Talk-de] Formal proposal: mechanically reverting fixme=set␣better␣denotation / denotation=cluster

On mercredi 11 mars 2015, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: in some cases it's modernizing tagging I don't like the sound of Modernizing tagging in a mechanical way, that should be handeled with care, and time. If you intend to replace all type=deciduous to leaf_cycle=deciduous send a new email with a

[Tagging] Precisions about tourism=chalet

Current tag page is here : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dchalet My questions copied from talk page : As a non native english speaker, I have no clues about what a chalet is supposed to be (in french, a chalet is a type of construction found in the mountain made of wood and does