Based on https://www.lemoniteur.be/documentation/horeca-135.html it
seems that a brasserie is a café that serves simple food, and hence the
manager doesn't need to be a professional cook:
_Café_
Vous ne devez pas avoir un accès à la profession Restaurateurs et
Traiteurs-organisateurs de banquet
But unlike a real pub (a "café" in Dutch and French - or "bruine
kroeg"), you can get a decent meal in a brasserie, or ice cream,
pancakes around 4pm etc. So the focus is much more on food imho.
So are you suggesting that amenity=pub; food=yes is better ?
the description tag is very general, but
Thomas Bertels wrote:
> A brasserie is "a small, informal restaurant that serves beer
> and wine as well as simple food"
> So should it be tagged as
> - amenity=restaurant cuisine=brasserie (emphasis on food)?
> - amenity=pub food=yes (emphasis on drinks)?
> - amenity=brasserie?
For me, a "
I typically tag them as amenity=restaurant.
I also add a tag restaurant:type:NL or horeca:type:NL (I know both are
bad, undocumented tags) in which I place the "type" as indicated on
the building.
There are so many variations possible taverne, brasserie, eetcafé,
bistro, restaurant-café etc. which
A brasserie is "a small, informal restaurant that serves beer and wine
as well as simple food" (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/brasserie)
In Belgium, a brasserie always serves both drinks and food, it's a
combination of a restaurant and a pub/café/bar.
So should it be tagged as
- amenity=restau
