Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

2018-07-03 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Tuesday 03 July 2018, osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au wrote: > > A waterway=canal, waterway=river, or waterway=stream way inside a > lake or pond is probably appropriate to connect an in-flow to an > out-flow in a direct line, to allow software to easily trace > waterways through lakes or

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

2018-07-03 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
3. Lipiec 2018 12:24 od osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au : > A waterway=canal, waterway=river, or waterway=stream way inside a lake or > pond is probably appropriate to connect an in-flow to an out-flow in a direct > line, to allow software to easily

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

2018-07-03 Thread osm.tagging
> -Original Message- > From: Christoph Hormann > Sent: Tuesday, 3 July 2018 18:26 > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels > > On Tuesday 03 July 2018, Multi Modaal wrote: > > [...

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

2018-07-03 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Christoph, 2018-07-03 10:25 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann : > * inventing new tags so far not used and documented is fine - but you > should document them. > * adding new uses to secondary tags (like using surface=* or usage=* on > features it is so far not commonly used on) is also fine if it

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

2018-07-03 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Tuesday 03 July 2018, Multi Modaal wrote: > [...] > > Summary: > I would suggest using [waterway=canal] or [waterway=river] for > routable lines across bodies of water despite the fact that you > normally wouldn’t call them as such. This because of common current > practice for routable

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

2018-07-02 Thread François Lacombe
Hi all, Consecutively to edits of page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:waterway%3Dcanal=history I'd add that waterway=canal is really often supported by an artificial structure and use it to cross a lake as a logical connection between entry points is awkward. Why simpler

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

2018-07-02 Thread Volker Schmidt
I do not agree with the proposal to use waterway=canal with a new canal=x tag to indicate a non-existant waterway for canoes. For the canoe routes, which started the canoe side of this discussion, I would say that the in-water ways should be tagged as route=canoe without problems and in