TL;DR - highway=wayside_station ?
~~~
> On Feb 19, 2018, at 12:40 AM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> At present the wiki says that highway=services is mainly for motorways and
> similar roads, but we have many places now that look like highway=services,
> but are on single carriageway ro
The common use of "bicycle=designated" is the equivalent of ( "bicycle=yes"
plus some kind of official vertical sign)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> Access tags are something different. You may well have a place were you
> can drive to with your car, but the service is only for bicycles
>
motorcar=yes, bicycle=designated.
___
Tagging mailing
Access tags are something different. You may well have a place were you can
drive to with your car, but the service is only for bicycles
On 18 February 2018 at 19:49, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
>> I would prefer a tag structure of the type
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> I would prefer a tag structure of the type
> highway=service _area (or highway=services ?)
> vehicle_type=bicycle; motorcycle; car; agricultural; hgv; motor_vehicle
> (with default vehicle_type=motor_vehicle?)
> attendant=yes|no
>
> I have
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 4:52 AM, nwastra wrote:
> I also find the highway=cycle_service_area tag is both useful and
> specific enough to be a widely used tag if documented on the osm cycling
> pages.
>
Indeed, it's something I would use if properly documented; we call them
plaza zones in Tulsa,
Hello,
Le 18. 02. 18 à 16:16, John Willis a écrit :
>> On Feb 18, 2018, at 10:44 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>> what's the difference between a service area on a road that is tagged with
>> highway=services and one that is tagged amenity=fuel
>
> highway=services (SA) is a singularly named place
At present the wiki says that highway=services is mainly for motorways and
similar roads, but we have many places now that look like highway=services,
but are on single carriageway roads and offer similar services, but are
tagged as amenity=fuel.
I am only pointing out that the dividing line betwe
Javbw
> On Feb 18, 2018, at 10:44 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> what's the difference between a service area on a road that is tagged with
> highway=services and one that is tagged amenity=fuel
I'll write a full response tomorrow, but highway=services (SA) is a singularly
named place with a
Taking a step back:
what's the difference between a service area on a road that is tagged with
highway=services and one that is tagged amenity=fuel (with the
corresponding additional tagging for food, ATM, ... ?
Is the difference only the number of carriageways? single carriageway >
amenity=fuel; d
Javbw
> On Feb 18, 2018, at 10:11 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> service _area:hgv=yes
Isn't a highway=services already for HGV ?
The issue I ran into is highway=services that are not on a motorway (a Japanese
road station) - but how does a facility "cater to" HGV and cyclists
On 18-Feb-18 08:58 AM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
highway=service_area
service _area=bicycle, hgv, horse,
As I said, I think we need multiple value possibility for this, hence
semicolon separator
possibly?
service _area:bicycle=yes
service _area:hgv=yes
etc
___
Thanks for all the comments everyone.
Javbw
> On Feb 18, 2018, at 5:43 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> highway=service _area
> service _area=bicycle, hgv, horse, etc
Warin's suggestion is probably best, that way the wheel doesn't have to be
reinvented for each type, service_are
highway=service_area
> service _area=bicycle, hgv, horse,
>
> As I said, I think we need multiple value possibility for this, hence
semicolon separator
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
No 'type' ! 'Type' says nothing so why say it.
Suggestion?
highway=service _area
service _area=bicycle, hgv, horse, etc
On 18-Feb-18 05:31 AM, Thilo Haug OSM wrote:
Hi Volker,
the way I understand the current syntax,
underscore is more for spaces (in terms)
and colon for namespaces (to
Hi Volker,
the way I understand the current syntax,
underscore is more for spaces (in terms)
and colon for namespaces (to separate the "subcategory").
So I'd use vehicle:type=* rather than vehicle_type=*
(leaves room for vehicle:anythingelse=*)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Namespace
Cheer
I would prefer a tag structure of the type
highway=service _area (or highway=services ?)
vehicle_type=bicycle; motorcycle; car; agricultural; hgv; motor_vehicle
(with default vehicle_type=motor_vehicle?)
attendant=yes|no
I have come across a number of (manned) service places where different
vehicl
Javbw
> On Feb 15, 2018, at 11:54 AM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
>
> think the highway=cycle_service_area tag is both useful and specific enough.
I will make a draft page for it and start using it for the very rare places
here. I assume the rest area in the OSM question thread is a sun protection
I think the highway=cycle_service_area tag is both useful and specific
enough. By the way, the highway=services tag is used to identify an area
(we call them 'service areas" on the east coast) that has fuel, restrooms,
water, food and parking for automobiles and trucks. I also use area=yes in
conju
19 matches
Mail list logo