On 22/7/20 12:53 am, Michael Montani wrote:
Dear all,
I wanted to check with you which is the best way to map farmlands
subject to rotation of crops. An example could be of a farmland used
for general crop in one part of the year and left it at rest for the
remaining part of the year, being
I agree that the information "crops are rotated in this field" is not
verifiable, because it is recording historic information about what
happened the last few seasons, rather than what is in the field right now.
It is ok to tag the crop that is currently planted in a field, especially
if it's a
Jul 22, 2020, 11:33 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 22. Jul 2020, at 10:36, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> I would go with farmland, orchard, vineyard and not even consider indicating
>> any rotation of crops.
>>
>
>
> +1, these are also those that I distinguish,
sent from a phone
> On 22. Jul 2020, at 10:36, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> I would go with farmland, orchard, vineyard and not even consider indicating
> any rotation of crops.
+1, these are also those that I distinguish, because annually sown crops are
subject to frequent changes, while
This is a rather tricky problem, especially as the changes may not follow
any particular pattern.
I am not a crop mapper at all, but I can distinguish between the major
local crops (in Italy). And in many cases the mapping in OSM is wrong,
mostly because the data is fruit of imports which were too
