Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Re[2]: PTv2 public_transport=stop_position for stop positions that vary based on train length
On 11/8/20 1:11 pm, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote: the train or trains do not stop where he says they do, Do they stop at the platform? Yes. So stop positions maybe mapped. and i am talking about 400 +, unverified platforms. which is 200 + stations, Unverified? Verified by the existing signs? This maybe 'out of date' but still verifiable. How 'inaccurate' are the present stop positions? How precise is the mapped position required? Were there stop positions there before? Is it not better to have some indication rather than nothing? "They will stay there for ever" unless someone improves them. Monday, August 10, 2020 9:33 PM -05:00 from Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: On 11/8/20 9:25 am, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote: one of the points that i talked about, that no one has answered yet is what about someone not local who just puts 400 + unverified stops on platforms and there all wrong. If you find something wrong - correct it. If the things mapped are deceitful, malicious etc then report it to the DWG to prevent more of the same. If the things mapped are better than what was there before then I would call them improvements and thus beneficial, no point in being upset by it. Being local is not a requirement to map, get over it. Local knowledge is beneficial as it aids mapping things that have local characteristics - like where trains stop. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Re[2]: PTv2 public_transport=stop_position for stop positions that vary based on train length
the train or trains do not stop where he says they do, and i am talking about 400 +, unverified platforms. which is 200 + stations, see; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metra https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-August/054669.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-August/054696.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-August/054697.html >Monday, August 10, 2020 9:33 PM -05:00 from Warin < 61sundow...@gmail.com >: > >On 11/8/20 9:25 am, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote: >>one of the points that i talked about, that no one has answered yet is what >>about someone not local >> >>who just puts 400 + unverified stops on platforms and there all wrong. >> >If you find something wrong - correct it. > >If the things mapped are deceitful, malicious etc then report it to the DWG to >prevent more of the same. >If the things mapped are better than what was there before then I would call >them improvements and thus beneficial, no point in being upset by it. >Being local is not a requirement to map, get over it. Local knowledge is >beneficial as it aids mapping things that have local characteristics - like >where trains stop. >___ >Tagging mailing list >Tagging@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Re[2]: PTv2 public_transport=stop_position for stop positions that vary based on train length
On 11/8/20 9:25 am, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote: one of the points that i talked about, that no one has answered yet is what about someone not local who just puts 400 + unverified stops on platforms and there all wrong. If you find something wrong - correct it. If the things mapped are deceitful, malicious etc then report it to the DWG to prevent more of the same. If the things mapped are better than what was there before then I would call them improvements and thus beneficial, no point in being upset by it. Being local is not a requirement to map, get over it. Local knowledge is beneficial as it aids mapping things that have local characteristics - like where trains stop. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Re[2]: PTv2 public_transport=stop_position for stop positions that vary based on train length
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 4:27 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > one of the points that i talked about, that no one has answered yet is > what about someone not local > > who just puts 400 + unverified stops on platforms and there all wrong. > Again, is there a reason you're not referring to me by name? It's getting a little on my nerves. I'll answer your question, though. If you want to verify and reposition them, go ahead. If you want to add more stop_position nodes to reflect train lengths, please feel free. Otherwise, if they still bother you, perhaps you can leave them alone and let others improve them. -Clay ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
