I'm not suggesting tagging "gay friendly" which is too
subjective, and, due to PR, might be less informative now.
On 24/10/2018 23:10, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
When going on holidays & checking accommodation / travel guides for
options, you often see a number of hotels / motels which are
Thanks for pointing to it. It was also reminding of this earlier discussion on how to tag the "friendly" attitude of a place, but I couldn't find it back.
"Biker friendly" is difficult to grasp because it's a mindset more than a fact, and we don't map places for their mindset but for tangible and
I agree with Frederick here, lgbtq=yes looks like the access tags.
This discussion also reminds me the motorcycle-friendly thread not so long ago.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/motorcycle_friendly
Yves
Le 23 octobre 2018 20:27:04 GMT+02:00, Rory McCann a
écrit :
>Hi all,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 09:56, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> This is not my area of expertise.
Or mine! :-)
> So I believe this would be verifiable information. It would also be safe
> to tag women=no for bars or clubs even in countries where LGBT activity is
> illegal or persecuted.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 6:56 PM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> This is not my area of expertise. But I’ve noticed that a number of bars
> that are designed for gay men in the USA have a sign on the door with a
> crossed out “W”. It looks like a no smoking sign but with a capital W
> instead of a
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 4:12 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> I've seen & wondered about the "gay" classification on places before.
>
> When going on holidays & checking accommodation / travel guides for
> options, you often see a number of hotels / motels which are listed as "gay
> friendly".
This is not my area of expertise. But I’ve noticed that a number of bars
that are designed for gay men in the USA have a sign on the door with a
crossed out “W”. It looks like a no smoking sign but with a capital W
instead of a cigarette.
This means “no women allowed.” My wife tells me this is
I've seen & wondered about the "gay" classification on places before.
When going on holidays & checking accommodation / travel guides for
options, you often see a number of hotels / motels which are listed as "gay
friendly". Does this mean only gays stay there / a majority of guests are
straight
On 23/10/2018 23:53, Andy Mabbett wrote
>> "shop=books lgbtq=yes" is a LGBTQ book shop
>
Wouldn't that be "shop=books books=lgbtq"?
Good point.
On 24/10/2018 00:55, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
there may be lgbtq things, but there are also places which are
explicitly gay bars, i.e. for
On 10/24/2018 4:27 AM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
*When* to add a lgbtq=yes tag can be hard to know. In some places a
gay bar can be easily identified by a prominent rainbow flag. Some
cultures are less accepting, so bars might not be so blatant (I've
seen this in the EU). Using the common OSM
On Tuesday 23 October 2018, Rory McCann wrote:
> [...]
>
> *When* to add a lgbtq=yes tag can be hard to know. In some places a
> gay bar can be easily identified by a prominent rainbow flag. Some
> cultures are less accepting, so bars might not be so blatant (I've
> seen this in the EU). Using the
Hi,
On 23.10.2018 20:27, Rory McCann wrote:
> So to start off, I'm suggest a simple "lgbtq=yes" tag to
> mean "this thing is a LGBTQ thing".
Bit difficult perhaps since usually "blah=yes" means that blah is
available or blah is permitted, not that the place is mostly/exclusively
for blah.
sent from a phone
> On 23. Oct 2018, at 20:27, Rory McCann wrote:
>
> There is an existing "gay" tag[1], which is used 650 times[2]. But it's
> a little restrictive. And it also suggested "gay:transgender=yes" which
> is just plain wrong.
> So to start off, I'm suggest a simple "lgbtq=yes"
13 matches
Mail list logo
