On 6/26/20 8:13 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> it’s up to your judgement, in my area if blocked with a mound this
> would not be a track anymore. You can decide whether keeping it for
> hikers (if legally and physically possible, i.e. highway=path) or
A week or so ago I fixed a bunch of
Are they natural deadfall or human-cut?
I've seen photos of places where the USFS has felled a substantial number
of trees across a road that's being decommissioned (or just razed, as it
was never properly part of the forest road system to begin with). I believe
the intent is to both eliminate
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 8:15 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
> > On 26. Jun 2020, at 15:59, Mike Thompson wrote:
> >
> > Trees have been there sometime by the looks of them, and are unlikely to
> be cleared. To the FS this track no longer exists (they have blocked its
>
sent from a phone
> On 26. Jun 2020, at 15:59, Mike Thompson wrote:
>
> Trees have been there sometime by the looks of them, and are unlikely to be
> cleared. To the FS this track no longer exists (they have blocked its only
> junction with the larger network with a mount of earth), so they
Thanks for all of the great suggestions. I have used many of them.
This is the way in question: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/819638979
Trees have been there sometime by the looks of them, and are unlikely to be
cleared. To the FS this track no longer exists (they have blocked its only
sent from a phone
> On 26. Jun 2020, at 02:58, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=log says it should only be
> used on a node, but if you don't know exactly where then I'd say using it on
> the way would be fine
when you add a barrier=log to something
As you've described it, I generally agree with Andrew's suggestions.
I do also think that expected local conditions matter; I've mapped some old
woods roads that are primarily used by Jeep and ATV traffic at this point.
Generally speaking, folks traveling those types of roads expect to find
Am Fr., 26. Juni 2020 um 12:02 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
> Jun 26, 2020, 09:29 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
> to me this sounds like an unmaintained track road.
>
> Yes, but how we should tag it?
>
sorry, couldn't resist ;-)
I would tag a few
Jun 26, 2020, 09:29 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 26. Jun 2020, at 01:45, Mike Thompson wrote:
>>
>> How would you recommend tagging a path or track that has many fallen trees
>> across it? There are too many to map each one with a node tagged barrier=log.
>>
>
>
sent from a phone
> On 26. Jun 2020, at 01:45, Mike Thompson wrote:
>
> How would you recommend tagging a path or track that has many fallen trees
> across it? There are too many to map each one with a node tagged barrier=log.
to me this sounds like an unmaintained track road.
Cheers
Usually this time of year there are many trees down from the winter, and
trail users or the forest service will eventually get around to clearing
them. If there aren't enough motivated users, and/or the FS has
abandoned it, one of Andrews ideas is probably appropriate.
On 6/25/20 6:56 PM,
It's a tricky one, but whatever is done I would need re-checking frequently
to know when it was cleared.
You could just add a single barrier=log somewhere as a rough approximation,
or add barrier=log to the way segment which is affected.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=log says it
On 6/25/20 5:44 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
> How would you recommend tagging a path or track that has many fallen
> trees across it? There are too many to map each one with a node tagged
> barrier=log. Foot travel is legal, but physically difficult. Horse and
> bicycle travel are legal but
13 matches
Mail list logo
