Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

2014-09-23 Thread Greg Troxel

I don't think we should have tags for particular proprietary services.

Instead, a URL to various pages can be given in the url tag, with ; if
necessary.


pgpejuxb2fe5M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

2014-09-02 Thread John Packer

 Why use contact: here, when it's not used by the majority anywhere else.

+1


2014-08-29 22:46 GMT-03:00 Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de:

 I don't want to change the addr:-, website-, phone-, fax- or
 email-key!!! I never said it.


 As Tobias pointed out, we have to look at the bigger pucture. Why use
 contact: here, when it's not used by the majority anywhere else.


  The contact-namespace associate, that the defined facebook- or
 googleplus-page are a medium to communicate with the defined object. I
 know a lot facebook-pages, who are created from fans or generated from a
 wikipedia-pages. That are mostly not a communication channel.


 But those unofficial (fan) pages should not be linked anyway. It would
 always be the official page.

 In addition even a lot of those pages are not really used for
 communication, so that seems even more like a argument against contact:,
 especially as mappers are not going to first figure out which company
 replies on google+ and which doesn't.

 __
 openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
 wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88‎


 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

2014-08-29 Thread Éric Gillet
It can be done easily with JOSM, you just need to download all
nodes/ways/relations, select them all and rename the offending tags in one
go.


On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Andreas Neumann andr-neum...@gmx.net
wrote:

 Hi,

 I would like to unify the keys for google-plus-pages of objects in the
 Database. In TagInfo I found this variants:

 contact:google+
 contact:google_plus
 link:google_plus
 contact:google
 Google +
 Google Plus
 Google+
 contact:googleplus
 contact:google +
 GooglePlus
 googleplus
 contatc:google+
 google business
 [https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=google]

 I would like to change the Keys in contact:google_plus
 [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact].

 I found also some Facebook-keys (with uppercase F). I would like to
 change them in contact:facebook
 [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact]. The same with
 Twitter (- contact:twitter).

 And I would like to move the social-network-links
 link:[facebook|twitter] in the contact-namespace.

 Andreas

 --
 sorry for my bad english...

 Andreas Neumann
 http://map4Jena.de
 http://Stadtplan-Ilmenau.de


 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

2014-08-29 Thread Andreas Neumann
Am 29.08.2014 um 11:48 schrieb Éric Gillet:
 It can be done easily with JOSM, you just need to download all
 nodes/ways/relations, select them all and rename the offending tags in
 one go.

I know, how to do it:

1. Download via Overpass
2. Open the file in JOSM
3. Change the keys

But I have to ask on Tagging or Talk, if I'll make a global change.

Andreas

-- 
Andreas Neumann
http://map4Jena.de
http://Stadtplan-Ilmenau.de



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

2014-08-29 Thread Andy Mabbett
This all seems sensible, with the exception that I can only ever recall
seeing the former referred to as Google +, and I think most people will
use the + sign.
On Aug 29, 2014 10:39 AM, Andreas Neumann andr-neum...@gmx.net wrote:

 Hi,

 I would like to unify the keys for google-plus-pages of objects in the
 Database. In TagInfo I found this variants:

 contact:google+
 contact:google_plus
 link:google_plus
 contact:google
 Google +
 Google Plus
 Google+
 contact:googleplus
 contact:google +
 GooglePlus
 googleplus
 contatc:google+
 google business
 [https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=google]

 I would like to change the Keys in contact:google_plus
 [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact].

 I found also some Facebook-keys (with uppercase F). I would like to
 change them in contact:facebook
 [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact]. The same with
 Twitter (- contact:twitter).

 And I would like to move the social-network-links
 link:[facebook|twitter] in the contact-namespace.

 Andreas

 --
 sorry for my bad english...

 Andreas Neumann
 http://map4Jena.de
 http://Stadtplan-Ilmenau.de


 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

2014-08-29 Thread Andreas Goss

I would like to unify the keys for google-plus-pages of objects in the
Database.


I think that's usually fine.


I would like to change the Keys in contact:google_plus
change them in contact:facebook


I'm not in support of this though. contact: is not commonly used and I 
don't think is has that much support either. For addresses most people 
use addr:, phone= and website= are much more popular than 
contact:phone/website=. So I really don't see a reason why we should use 
contact: for social media. facebook=*, google_plus=* works just fine in 
my opinion and it's also what a lot of mappers use.

__
openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88‎


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

2014-08-29 Thread Andreas Neumann
The problem is the + and the space sign. Both are bad chars for a key.

Maybe someone can tell why.

[http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/contact%3Agoogle%20%2B]

Andreas


On 29.08.2014 11:57, Andy Mabbett wrote:
 This all seems sensible, with the exception that I can only ever recall
 seeing the former referred to as Google +, and I think most people
 will use the + sign.
 
 On Aug 29, 2014 10:39 AM, Andreas Neumann andr-neum...@gmx.net
 mailto:andr-neum...@gmx.net wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I would like to unify the keys for google-plus-pages of objects in the
 Database. In TagInfo I found this variants:
 
 contact:google+
 contact:google_plus
 link:google_plus
 contact:google
 Google +
 Google Plus
 Google+
 contact:googleplus
 contact:google +
 GooglePlus
 googleplus
 contatc:google+
 google business
 [https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=google]
 
 I would like to change the Keys in contact:google_plus
 [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact].
 
 I found also some Facebook-keys (with uppercase F). I would like to
 change them in contact:facebook
 [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact]. The same with
 Twitter (- contact:twitter).
 
 And I would like to move the social-network-links
 link:[facebook|twitter] in the contact-namespace.
 
 Andreas



-- 
sorry for my bad english...

Andreas Neumann
http://Map4Jena.de
http://Stadtplan-Ilmenau.de



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

2014-08-29 Thread John Packer
The character plus (+) is an unusual character for keys indeed.
I believe it's because people usually say x=y + a=b when talking about a
combination of two tags.


2014-08-29 11:36 GMT-03:00 Andreas Neumann andr-neum...@gmx.net:

 The problem is the + and the space sign. Both are bad chars for a key.

 Maybe someone can tell why.

 [http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/contact%3Agoogle%20%2B]

 Andreas


 On 29.08.2014 11:57, Andy Mabbett wrote:
  This all seems sensible, with the exception that I can only ever recall
  seeing the former referred to as Google +, and I think most people
  will use the + sign.
 
  On Aug 29, 2014 10:39 AM, Andreas Neumann andr-neum...@gmx.net
  mailto:andr-neum...@gmx.net wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  I would like to unify the keys for google-plus-pages of objects in
 the
  Database. In TagInfo I found this variants:
 
  contact:google+
  contact:google_plus
  link:google_plus
  contact:google
  Google +
  Google Plus
  Google+
  contact:googleplus
  contact:google +
  GooglePlus
  googleplus
  contatc:google+
  google business
  [https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=google]
 
  I would like to change the Keys in contact:google_plus
  [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact].
 
  I found also some Facebook-keys (with uppercase F). I would like
 to
  change them in contact:facebook
  [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact]. The same with
  Twitter (- contact:twitter).
 
  And I would like to move the social-network-links
  link:[facebook|twitter] in the contact-namespace.
 
  Andreas



 --
 sorry for my bad english...

 Andreas Neumann
 http://Map4Jena.de
 http://Stadtplan-Ilmenau.de


 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

2014-08-29 Thread Steve Doerr
I note that the domain name for Google+ is plus.google.com, so there is 
no objection to substituting 'plus' for '+' in some way.


Steve

On 29/08/2014 15:36, Andreas Neumann wrote:

The problem is the + and the space sign. Both are bad chars for a key.

Maybe someone can tell why.

[http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/contact%3Agoogle%20%2B]

Andreas


On 29.08.2014 11:57, Andy Mabbett wrote:

This all seems sensible, with the exception that I can only ever recall
seeing the former referred to as Google +, and I think most people
will use the + sign.

On Aug 29, 2014 10:39 AM, Andreas Neumann andr-neum...@gmx.net
mailto:andr-neum...@gmx.net wrote:

 Hi,

 I would like to unify the keys for google-plus-pages of objects in the
 Database. In TagInfo I found this variants:

 contact:google+
 contact:google_plus
 link:google_plus
 contact:google
 Google +
 Google Plus
 Google+
 contact:googleplus
 contact:google +
 GooglePlus
 googleplus
 contatc:google+
 google business
 [https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=google]

 I would like to change the Keys in contact:google_plus
 [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact].

 I found also some Facebook-keys (with uppercase F). I would like to
 change them in contact:facebook
 [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact]. The same with
 Twitter (- contact:twitter).

 And I would like to move the social-network-links
 link:[facebook|twitter] in the contact-namespace.

 Andreas





___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

2014-08-29 Thread Andreas Neumann
Hi,

I disagree.
Example:
https://plus.google.com/+ConciergeCleanersCo is the same like
https://google.com/+ConciergeCleanersCo

And there are a lot of other URL-schema.

Andreas

On 29.08.2014 19:49, Steve Doerr wrote:
 I note that the domain name for Google+ is plus.google.com, so there is
 no objection to substituting 'plus' for '+' in some way.
 
 Steve
 
 On 29/08/2014 15:36, Andreas Neumann wrote:
 The problem is the + and the space sign. Both are bad chars for a key.

 Maybe someone can tell why.

 [http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/contact%3Agoogle%20%2B]

 Andreas


 On 29.08.2014 11:57, Andy Mabbett wrote:
 This all seems sensible, with the exception that I can only ever recall
 seeing the former referred to as Google +, and I think most people
 will use the + sign.

 On Aug 29, 2014 10:39 AM, Andreas Neumann andr-neum...@gmx.net
 mailto:andr-neum...@gmx.net wrote:

 Hi,

 I would like to unify the keys for google-plus-pages of objects in the
 Database. In TagInfo I found this variants:

 contact:google+
 contact:google_plus
 link:google_plus
 contact:google
 Google +
 Google Plus
 Google+
 contact:googleplus
 contact:google +
 GooglePlus
 googleplus
 contatc:google+
 google business
 [https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=google]

 I would like to change the Keys in contact:google_plus
 [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact].

 I found also some Facebook-keys (with uppercase F). I would like to
 change them in contact:facebook
 [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact]. The same with
 Twitter (- contact:twitter).

 And I would like to move the social-network-links
 link:[facebook|twitter] in the contact-namespace.

 Andreas


-- 
Andreas Neumann
http://Map4Jena.de
http://Stadtplan-Ilmenau.de



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

2014-08-29 Thread Andreas Neumann
On 29.08.2014 12:44, Andreas Goss wrote:
 I would like to unify the keys for google-plus-pages of objects in the
 Database.
 
 I think that's usually fine.
 
 I would like to change the Keys in contact:google_plus
 change them in contact:facebook
 
 I'm not in support of this though. contact: is not commonly used and I
 don't think is has that much support either. For addresses most people
 use addr:, phone= and website= are much more popular than
 contact:phone/website=. So I really don't see a reason why we should use
 contact: for social media. facebook=*, google_plus=* works just fine in
 my opinion and it's also what a lot of mappers use.

OK,

I don't want to change the addr:-, website-, phone-, fax- or
email-key!!! I never said it.

The contact-namespace associate, that the defined facebook- or
googleplus-page are a medium to communicate with the defined object. I
know a lot facebook-pages, who are created from fans or generated from a
wikipedia-pages. That are mostly not a communication channel.

Andreas


-- 
Andreas Neumann
http://Map4Jena.de
http://Stadtplan-Ilmenau.de



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

2014-08-29 Thread Steve Doerr
That's as may be. But the widget Google gives you to switch between 
their various apps uses a URL beginning https://plus.google.com to 
switch to Google+. At least, it does for me.


Steve

On 29/08/2014 19:07, Andreas Neumann wrote:

Hi,

I disagree.
Example:
https://plus.google.com/+ConciergeCleanersCo is the same like
https://google.com/+ConciergeCleanersCo

And there are a lot of other URL-schema.

Andreas

On 29.08.2014 19:49, Steve Doerr wrote:

I note that the domain name for Google+ is plus.google.com, so there is
no objection to substituting 'plus' for '+' in some way.

Steve

On 29/08/2014 15:36, Andreas Neumann wrote:

The problem is the + and the space sign. Both are bad chars for a key.

Maybe someone can tell why.

[http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/contact%3Agoogle%20%2B]

Andreas


On 29.08.2014 11:57, Andy Mabbett wrote:

This all seems sensible, with the exception that I can only ever recall
seeing the former referred to as Google +, and I think most people
will use the + sign.

On Aug 29, 2014 10:39 AM, Andreas Neumann andr-neum...@gmx.net
mailto:andr-neum...@gmx.net wrote:

 Hi,

 I would like to unify the keys for google-plus-pages of objects in the
 Database. In TagInfo I found this variants:

 contact:google+
 contact:google_plus
 link:google_plus
 contact:google
 Google +
 Google Plus
 Google+
 contact:googleplus
 contact:google +
 GooglePlus
 googleplus
 contatc:google+
 google business
 [https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=google]

 I would like to change the Keys in contact:google_plus
 [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact].

 I found also some Facebook-keys (with uppercase F). I would like to
 change them in contact:facebook
 [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact]. The same with
 Twitter (- contact:twitter).

 And I would like to move the social-network-links
 link:[facebook|twitter] in the contact-namespace.

 Andreas




___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

2014-08-29 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 29.08.2014 20:09, Andreas Neumann wrote:
 I don't want to change the addr:-, website-, phone-, fax- or
 email-key!!! I never said it.

But we have to look at these to decide whether it's better to move
towards the contact namespace as a whole or move away from it. It makes
little sense to move a couple keys toward contact: when the general
trend is to avoid its use.

In a similar discussion recently, I summed up the popularity of the keys
with and without contact: prefix. As of the 25th of July, the taginfo
numbers were:

no contact prefix: 1033228
contact prefix: 154241

 The contact-namespace associate, that the defined facebook- or
 googleplus-page are a medium to communicate with the defined object. I
 know a lot facebook-pages, who are created from fans or generated from a
 wikipedia-pages. That are mostly not a communication channel.

There is no difference in meaning between contact:website and website,
both do _not_ allow fan-made pages. This should make it obvious that the
contact namespace does not imply a different meaning, it is simply a way
of organizing keys. One that most mappers don't use.

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

2014-08-29 Thread Andreas Goss

I don't want to change the addr:-, website-, phone-, fax- or
email-key!!! I never said it.


As Tobias pointed out, we have to look at the bigger pucture. Why use 
contact: here, when it's not used by the majority anywhere else.



The contact-namespace associate, that the defined facebook- or
googleplus-page are a medium to communicate with the defined object. I
know a lot facebook-pages, who are created from fans or generated from a
wikipedia-pages. That are mostly not a communication channel.


But those unofficial (fan) pages should not be linked anyway. It would 
always be the official page.


In addition even a lot of those pages are not really used for 
communication, so that seems even more like a argument against contact:, 
especially as mappers are not going to first figure out which company 
replies on google+ and which doesn't.

__
openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88‎


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging