sent from a phone
> On 12. Jun 2019, at 01:51, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Other features in the key natural are either land covers or land forms and
> could be split into those 2 keys.
that’s not completely accurate, there are also point features, e.g.
natural=spring,
On 11/06/19 19:30, marc marc wrote:
Le 11.06.19 à 11:14, Tomas Straupis a écrit :
What do you think?
I find very strange that reservoir is a landuse by itself
it would be a bit like putting landuse=rest on a bench
or landuse=stop on a parking lot.
landuse should be what the place is for.
On 11/06/19 19:30, marc marc wrote:
Le 11.06.19 à 11:14, Tomas Straupis a écrit :
What do you think?
I find very strange that reservoir is a landuse by itself
it would be a bit like putting landuse=rest on a bench
or landuse=stop on a parking lot.
landuse should be what the place is for.
I agree with Marcin preference for natural=water, water=reservoir, because
it keeps landuse open for the actual use of the land that contains a
reservoir. I dislike landuse-within-landuse.
But I agree with Tomas that this preference does not make it a "better"
option, and the wiki should not state
> I find very strange that reservoir is a landuse by itself
> it would be a bit like putting landuse=rest on a bench
> or landuse=stop on a parking lot.
> <...>
There are a infinite number of arguments on both sides. Pandora box
was already opened and dual standard for water tagging already
Le 11.06.19 à 11:14, Tomas Straupis a écrit :
>What do you think?
I find very strange that reservoir is a landuse by itself
it would be a bit like putting landuse=rest on a bench
or landuse=stop on a parking lot.
landuse should be what the place is for. reservoir is the function
of the
