On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 09:16, Colin Smale wrote:
>
> Country-specific concepts require country-specific tagging,
>
Yes, but how that country-specific tagging is implemented matters.
Rest of world uses A=B to denote objects of type P. Country X decides that
A=B
denotes objects of type Q. Defin
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 29 ott 2019, alle ore 10:16, Colin Smale ha
> scritto:
>
> If X:de, X:it and X:fr appear to mean the same thing, it doesn't mean there
> aren't subtleties which would be lost for ever if the tagging was conflated.
whether or not they are lost depends on how yo
On 2019-10-29 01:21, Paul Allen wrote:
> I have an innate dislike of such countrification on a global map. It's
> better than
> hijacking tags without adding a country code ("The rest of the world uses X=Y
> to mean
> Z but in my country X=Y means W"), but only marginally so. The problem com
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 12:48:42AM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > Il giorno 28 ott 2019, alle ore 10:00, Sarah Hoffmann ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > It is one possibility to tag such administrational oddities
> > as German "kreisfreie Städte" where an admin_level=6 may be
> > a county or a cit
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 29 ott 2019, alle ore 01:23, Paul Allen ha
> scritto:
>
> From a very brief examination of what kreisfreie Städte are they seem to bear
> some
> similarities to the UK's unitary authorities.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitary_authority
> If the concepts a
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 00:05, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> For the rare situation like a "kreisfreie Städte" which can be a
> "city" or a "county, it could make sense to use
> "border_type:de=, or "designation:de="?
>
I have an innate dislike of such countrification on a global map. It's
better th
For the rare situation like a "kreisfreie Städte" which can be a
"city" or a "county, it could make sense to use
"border_type:de=, or "designation:de="?
On 10/29/19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> Il giorno 28 ott 2019, alle ore 10:00, Sarah Hoffmann
>> ha scritto:
>>
>>
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 28 ott 2019, alle ore 10:00, Sarah Hoffmann ha
> scritto:
>
> It is one possibility to tag such administrational oddities
> as German "kreisfreie Städte" where an admin_level=6 may be
> a county or a city.
thank you, this is indeed a case where it actually adds
On 10/28/19 2:59 AM, Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
>> +1, I have never understood why some people are double tagging
>> administrative entities not only with admin_level and boundary but also with
>> place tags.
>
> It is one possibility to tag such administrational oddities
> as German "kreisfreie Stä
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 06:17:29AM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > Il giorno 28 ott 2019, alle ore 02:56, Clifford Snow
> > ha scritto:
> >
> > Counties in the US are tagged as admin_level=6 + boundary=administrative.
>
>
> +1, I have never understood why som
28 Oct 2019, 06:17 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> Il giorno 28 ott 2019, alle ore 02:56, Clifford Snow
>> ha scritto:
>>
>> Counties in the US are tagged as admin_level=6 + boundary=administrative.
>>
>
>
> +1, I have never understood why some people are double taggin
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 28 ott 2019, alle ore 02:56, Clifford Snow
> ha scritto:
>
> Counties in the US are tagged as admin_level=6 + boundary=administrative.
+1, I have never understood why some people are double tagging administrative
entities not only with admin_level and boundary
12 matches
Mail list logo
