hi,
sajol...@pimienta.org:
> intrigeri wrote:
>> [...]
Sorry for the lack of answer to this thread and thanks for keeping it
alive ! I'll try to edit the blueprint before the hackfest to mention
the idea of having both an HTTP redirect and a few "core" mirrors to
handle this redirect. Thus, maybe
30/06/14 09:48, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> t-p-s:feature/nicer-cucumber-features takes advantage of recent
> improvements to Test::BDD::Cucumber. Please review'n'merge, ideally
> for 1.1 (this could easily be sneaked into the t-p-s .deb update for
> translations). Only the test suite is affected,
01/07/14 19:33, anonym wrote:
> 01/07/14 19:14, intrigeri wrote:
>> anonym wrote (01 Jul 2014 16:38:12 GMT) :
>>> Next (and I think this is unrealted to this branch) in "Scenario:
>>> Upgrading an old Tails USB installation from an ISO image, running on
>>> the old version" I get:
>>
>>> Then T
01/07/14 19:14, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anonym wrote (01 Jul 2014 16:38:12 GMT) :
>> 'apt' is not a source dir, but 'apt/cache' and 'apt/lists' are. Also, no
>> exception was added for (the incorrect) 'apt' in the "persistent
>> directories have safe access rights" step (like was done for
>> 'n
01/07/14 19:14, intrigeri wrote:
>>> commit 86da95283669545219492d6f4921eb9cb66dd2eb
>>> Author: Tails developers
>>> Date: Mon Jun 30 09:42:07 2014 +
>>>
>>> Remove files as the parent directory's owner.
>>>
>>> Else, it can't possibly succeed.
>> [...]
>>> -assert(@vm.exec
01/07/14 19:14, intrigeri wrote:
> anonym wrote (01 Jul 2014 16:38:12 GMT) :
>> Next (and I think this is unrealted to this branch) in "Scenario:
>> Upgrading an old Tails USB installation from an ISO image, running on
>> the old version" I get:
>
>> Then Tails is installed on USB drive "to_upg
Hi,
anonym wrote (01 Jul 2014 16:38:12 GMT) :
> 'apt' is not a source dir, but 'apt/cache' and 'apt/lists' are. Also, no
> exception was added for (the incorrect) 'apt' in the "persistent
> directories have safe access rights" step (like was done for
> 'nm-system-connections' and 'cups').
Indeed,
01/07/14 15:22, anonym wrote:
> I'm currently running usb_install.feature with current testing as
> --old-iso, which should test the permission fixes from commit 97961bf in
> an appropriate manner. I'll report back on that.
Another issue:
> commit d5a602bf65032ae4da715f62ce4079b915b4bedf
[...]
>
intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (30 Jun 2014 15:52:11 GMT) :
>> I'm wondering if this added complexity is really worth it for a first
>> fix. Could we work on this core HTTP redirection mechanism first (to
>> solve the pool size problem) -- with maybe lizard running a duplic
Hi,
anonym wrote (01 Jul 2014 14:03:17 GMT) :
> I optimistically pushed this fix into the bugfix branch in commit
> 9723367. I hope you don't mind.
Looks good to me, thanks for fixing this :)
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@b
u:
> What do you think?
I also think this would be a good idea.
--
Cheers!
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to
tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
01/07/14 15:22, anonym wrote:
m currently running usb_install.feature with current testing as
> --old-iso, which should test the permission fixes from commit 97961bf in
> an appropriate manner. I'll report back on that.
One minor issue so far:
> commit 97961bf
[...]
> + if [
01/07/14 14:56, intrigeri wrote:
> anonym wrote (30 Jun 2014 18:31:17 GMT) :
>> However, when I set --old-iso to 1.1~beta1 I get problems in Scenario:
>> Upgrading an old Tails USB installation from a Tails DVD:
>
> Persistence created with 1.1~beta1 has wrong ownership (#7343).
> We've not added
intrigeri:
> u wrote (01 Jul 2014 12:29:51 GMT) :
>> Eventually, this could also become the list to get work on the website done?
>
> I see there's definitely some common ground between UX/UI and website
> work, but I'm concerned that it would perhaps be mixing too different
> kinds of work in a s
anonym wrote (30 Jun 2014 18:31:17 GMT) :
> However, when I set --old-iso to 1.1~beta1 I get problems in Scenario:
> Upgrading an old Tails USB installation from a Tails DVD:
Persistence created with 1.1~beta1 has wrong ownership (#7343).
We've not added any code to cope with it, and I personally
u wrote (01 Jul 2014 12:29:51 GMT) :
> Eventually, this could also become the list to get work on the website done?
I see there's definitely some common ground between UX/UI and website
work, but I'm concerned that it would perhaps be mixing too different
kinds of work in a single place: possibly
Hi,
u wrote (01 Jul 2014 12:27:24 GMT) :
> What do you think?
Totally makes sense to me.
Generally speaking, I'm happy to see any team working on Tails decide
what tools are the most suitable for their work. So, if you folks want
a mailing-list, a Git repo, or whatever, feel free :)
Cheers,
--
Hi,
sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (30 Jun 2014 15:52:11 GMT) :
> I'm wondering if this added complexity is really worth it for a first
> fix. Could we work on this core HTTP redirection mechanism first (to
> solve the pool size problem) -- with maybe lizard running a duplicate of
> this script -- an
> Hi!
>
> In preparation of the hackfest, it occurred to me that it might be
> interesting to create a public UI/UX mailing list so other people /
> new contributors can get involved in this subject more easily (and
> relieve us a bit) - without necessarily needing the follow the tails-dev
> list.
Hi!
In preparation of the hackfest, it occurred to me that it might be
interesting to create a public UI/UX mailing list so other people /
new contributors can get involved in this subject more easily (and
relieve us a bit) - without necessarily needing the follow the tails-dev
list..
Until now t
intrigeri wrote:
> I agree yet another layer of indirection, with HTTP, is the best.
>
> Your latest preferred idea (with dynamic code picking a mirror among
> the full list, running on a few "super-mirrors"), is not mentioned on
> the blueprint yet, right?
>
> I like it too, but its feasibility
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (29 Jun 2014 11:01:19 GMT) :
> it's now been made clear that the vagrant package in Debian needs
> help:
I gave a quick try at packaging the latest upstream release, and
failed (might be trivially fixable by anyone with some experience in
packaging Ruby stuff for Debian -- see
anonym wrote (30 Jun 2014 18:27:26 GMT) :
> Hmm, the branch is at commit defdf75, so I guess you forget to push.
Right, sorry. Now pushed.
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To
anonym wrote (30 Jun 2014 18:33:49 GMT) :
> Looks good and works fine, merged!
Thanks. Merged into devel.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send
anonym wrote (30 Jun 2014 18:33:46 GMT) :
> Thanks for catching this! Merged!
Thanks. Merged into devel.
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send
25 matches
Mail list logo
