[Tails-dev] Useful websites Tails could utilize

2015-08-11 Thread jf93hfe3f 34fr3g34g
https://gratipay.com If I am incorrect, I apologize. However at this time I am not aware of Tails, or any member of the team that is on Gratipay. In comparison to the other mainstream crowdfunding websites, this one appears to have the closest mission statement to Tails. Their blog can be foun

Re: [Tails-dev] Reopening Bug #7755 (Migrate WhisperBack to Python 3) ?

2015-08-11 Thread Romeo Papa
On 08/11/2015 05:44 PM, intrigeri wrote: > In general, please don't start the same discussion in two different > places at the same time :) My bad, sorry about that. Did you mean sending two different emails about these related (7755/9412) issues, or starting a discussion about the same things by

Re: [Tails-dev] Patch for #9412 (Add SOCKS support to WhisperBack)

2015-08-11 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Romeo Papa wrote (11 Aug 2015 15:13:45 GMT) : > https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/9412#note-11 Thanks! Please read https://tails.boum.org/contribute/merge_policy/#submit wrt. how to submit your changes: Redmine is enough, as long as you correctly set the metadata there :) Cheers, -- intr

Re: [Tails-dev] Reopening Bug #7755 (Migrate WhisperBack to Python 3) ?

2015-08-11 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Romeo Papa wrote (10 Aug 2015 12:41:16 GMT) : > While working on #9412 (Add SOCKS support to WhisperBack) I've stepped > into some issues which I believe are related to the whisperback-python3 > ticket. > Please see https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/7755#note-38 FTR: addressed there. In g

[Tails-dev] Patch for #9412 (Add SOCKS support to WhisperBack)

2015-08-11 Thread Romeo Papa
https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/9412#note-11 Hi, Here's the updated patch, with which I've been able to successfully send a message earlier today. I've also published the branch on gitlab, on a clone of whisperback's repo. Maybe it's more convenient for you: https://gitlab.com/romeopapa/whis

Re: [Tails-dev] Release versioning

2015-08-11 Thread intrigeri
hi, sajolida wrote (10 Aug 2015 16:48:49 GMT) : > I might have found a bug in our new version numbering scheme... > We're saying, regarding the second number, "odd = major" and "even = > minor". But at the same time "2.0 = major" (or actually super major). > But zero is even [1]. Indeed. I see t