hi,
intrigeri wrote (11 Dec 2014 17:19:37 GMT) :
anonym wrote (08 Dec 2014 09:16:06 GMT) :
I guess what you want is that whenever one of the password fields
are modified we do something like:
if len(auth_password) == 0 and len(test_password) == 0:
anonym wrote (08 Dec 2014 09:16:06 GMT) :
I guess what you want is that whenever one of the password fields
are modified we do something like:
if len(auth_password) == 0 and len(test_password) == 0:
self.warning_area_pw_mismatch.hide()
self.warning_area_pw_match.hide()
On 06/12/14 12:33, intrigeri wrote:
Given that the semantics of the fields are pretty different in the
Greeter compared to in t-p-s, please provide a detailed description of
how you think the Greeter should be changed in case you still think it's
desirable.
What I had in mind is:
a. I
Hi,
[sorry it took me so long to come back to this..]
anonym wrote (13 May 2014 09:45:43 GMT) :
12/05/14 17:41, intrigeri wrote:
The rest of the suggested changes make sense to me. The t-p-s UI is
way nicer, with a nice little warning dynamically updated as long as
entered password
14/05/14 11:00, Andres Gomez Ramirez wrote:
But the patch is compound of two parts: one for obligatory password
and other that checks for admin password matching. I think this last
part could be keep.
Sorry, but I don't get it. I've looked as best I can on the patch, and
the only other thing
oh yes you are right, ok drop it all.
cheers.
From: Tails-dev [tails-dev-boun...@boum.org] on behalf of anonym
[ano...@riseup.net]
Sent: 14 May 2014 13:01
To: The Tails public development discussion list
Subject: Re: [Tails-dev] #5594: tails-greeter
anonym wrote (13 May 2014 09:45:43 GMT) :
Given that the semantics of the fields are pretty different in the
Greeter compared to in t-p-s, please provide a detailed description of
how you think the Greeter should be changed in case you still think it's
desirable.
I'll do this when I'm back,
30/03/14 19:22, Andres Gomez Ramirez wrote:
Hi,
Do you think you could rebase your patch on top of the wheezy branch
of the greeter, and test it in an (experimental) Wheezy-based ISO?
You can download such an ISO on
http://nightly.tails.boum.org/build_Tails_ISO_feature-wheezy/
yes,
anonym wrote (12 May 2014 15:02:45 GMT) :
That makes a lot of sense in t-p-s since we *force* the persistent
container to be encrypted with a password. But for the Greeter's
*optional* admin password I'm note sure it makes sense.
I don't think it makes any sense. Sorry, I'm probably the one
2014 12:05
To: The Tails public development discussion list
Subject: Re: [Tails-dev] #5594: tails-greeter: better administration
password UI
Andres Gomez Ramirez wrote (22 Feb 2014 18:10:41 GMT) :
In the patch you use at least one untranslated string
Hi,
Andres Gomez Ramirez wrote (30 Mar 2014 13:26:46 GMT) :
Hi, I attached a new patch for Feature #5594 tails-greeter: better
administration password UI.
Thanks! The next release (1.0) will be a point-release, and I don't
think this qualifies as a bugfix worth including in it, so I'll assume
Andres Gomez Ramirez wrote (22 Feb 2014 18:10:41 GMT) :
In the patch you use at least one untranslated string in
+self.warning_label.set_markup(iPassword must not be
empty./i)
but possibly also in
+self.warning_label.set_markup(iPasswords do not match./i)
In the
06/02/14 00:31, Andres Gomez Ramirez wrote:
I attached a patch for #5594: tails-greeter: better administration password
UI
https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/5594
Thanks for the patch!
In the patch you use at least one untranslated string in
+
Hello,
I attached a patch for #5594: tails-greeter: better administration password
UI
https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/5594
Cheers,
AndresFrom 21a3920dda03d0f6048aaca5ffd07da1248e843b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kurono andres.go...@cern.ch
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:26:35 -0500
Subject:
14 matches
Mail list logo
