Re: [Tails-dev] Icedove modifications

2013-01-29 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
intrigeri: hi, since I had much more urgent stuff to do yesterday, I've rebased our Icedove patchset on top of current sid's one, uploaded the resulting packages to the feature-icedove APT suite, updated the feature/icedove Git branch so that it builds and uses these packages. I don't

Re: [Tails-dev] Icedove modifications

2013-01-28 Thread intrigeri
hi, since I had much more urgent stuff to do yesterday, I've rebased our Icedove patchset on top of current sid's one, uploaded the resulting packages to the feature-icedove APT suite, updated the feature/icedove Git branch so that it builds and uses these packages. I don't really intend to go

Re: [Tails-dev] Icedove modifications

2012-05-15 Thread intrigeri
anonym wrote (13 Jan 2012 10:21:09 GMT) : git://labs.riseup.net/tails_icedove.git The mirror at repo.or.cz has a web interface: http://repo.or.cz/w/tails_icedove.git ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org

Re: [Tails-dev] Icedove modifications

2012-05-08 Thread anonym
04/20/2012 01:47 AM, intrigeri: hi, intrigeri wrote (17 Jan 2012 10:40:29 GMT) : anonym wrote (16 Jan 2012 12:23:24 GMT) : Now I think everything is ready :) Great. Let's organize next steps, then? [I wanted to send a quarterly ping, but then I did a bit more...] I took some time to

Re: [Tails-dev] Icedove modifications

2012-04-20 Thread intrigeri
hi, intrigeri wrote (17 Jan 2012 10:40:29 GMT) : anonym wrote (16 Jan 2012 12:23:24 GMT) : Now I think everything is ready :) Great. Let's organize next steps, then? [I wanted to send a quarterly ping, but then I did a bit more...] I took some time to look where things are at. Looks like

Re: [Tails-dev] Icedove modifications

2012-01-19 Thread sajolida
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 anonym: 01/11/2012 11:35 PM, intrigeri: anonym wrote (11 Jan 2012 20:54:21 GMT) : 2. Fetch configuration from email service provider: Disabled when ssl_only == true. It would be easy to make it try https first, and then fallback to http

Re: [Tails-dev] Icedove modifications

2012-01-19 Thread anonym
01/19/2012 12:56 PM, sajolida: anonym: 01/11/2012 11:35 PM, intrigeri: * ssl_only does not check whether any fetched config (like in step 1 and 3) uses plaintext smtp, pop or imap. Do we want this? I wouldn't ask if it was a trivial change, but this code is a complete mess and would

Re: [Tails-dev] Icedove modifications

2012-01-17 Thread intrigeri
anonym wrote (16 Jan 2012 12:23:24 GMT) : Now I think everything is ready :) Great. Let's organize next steps, then? Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc |

Re: [Tails-dev] Icedove modifications

2012-01-12 Thread intrigeri
Hi, * ssl_only really does two separate things: 1. It forces SSL for *fetching* configs. 2. It forces SSL or STARTTLS in the *resulting* configuration when *guessing* the config. Is this confusing? Anything else would look strongly inconsistent to me, at least in the

Re: [Tails-dev] Icedove modifications

2012-01-11 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Great work! Replies inline bellow. anonym wrote (11 Jan 2012 20:54:21 GMT) : 2. Fetch configuration from email service provider: Disabled when ssl_only == true. It would be easy to make it try https first, and then fallback to http only if ssl_only == false, but a comment in the