Hi there,
sorry for the delay, I got side tracked with other stuff.
My first and summary impression is, that this is looking excellent!
./tor-controlport-filter --listen-address 9052
Tor control port filter started, listening on 9052:9051
Do you see any reason in Whonix not to use the
> [...]
>> In conclusion, I think the truth is that Whonix switching to our filter
>> will require some work to reach feature-parity with you current filter,
>> and you will not really gain anything by doing so except code sharing.
>> YMMV. That said, I'd happily implement match-hosts and the two
anonym:
> https://tails.boum.org/news/report_2016_09/#index2h1
>
> and look at the documentation at the top of the script, and the filter
> rules we ship to get an idea of what it can do.
> As you can see, in Tails we use match-exe-paths and match-users a lot,
> but since you won't have
Hi,
I'll be the release manager for Tails 2.8, which is a major release
scheduled on 2016-12-13. The list of tickets targeting Tails 2.8 can be
found here:
https://labs.riseup.net/code/projects/tails/issues?query_id=217
Below you'll find the preliminary release schedule for Tails 2.8. I
Hi all!
Tor Browser 6.0.6 is ready for testing. Bundles can be found on
https://people.torproject.org/~boklm/builds/6.0.6-build5
This release is updating Firefox to 45.5.0esr fixing important security
bugs. Moreover, other components are getting an update as well: Tor to
0.2.8.9,
