.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tails-dev] dconf-editor dropped, gedit-plugins,
> systemd,w32codecs
> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 20:44:40 -0600
>
>> TL;DR: I think we should ship as many codecs as we can, to allow as
>> wide of access to media as possible.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 7,
Original Message
From: Austin English <austinengl...@gmail.com>
Apparently from: tails-dev-boun...@boum.org
To: The Tails public development discussion list <tails-dev@boum.org>
Subject: Re: [Tails-dev] dconf-editor dropped, gedit-plugins, systemd,w32codecs
Date: Tue
minor correction from the mail I just sent:
the opening line of my research page should read:
dconf-editor mysterious disappearance in 2.0.1 solved! dconf-tools is missing!
and not:
dconf-tools mysterious disappearance in 2.0.1 solved! dconf-tools is missing!
Original Message
From: intrigeri <intrig...@boum.org>
Apparently from: tails-dev-boun...@boum.org
To: Anonymous <anonym...@hoi-polloi.org>
Cc: tails-dev@boum.org
Subject: Re: [Tails-dev] dconf-editor dropped, gedit-plugins, systemd,w32codecs
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 11
Well, as emmapeel said when libdvdcss originally was discussed:
"I think access to culture is a very important right for people, and I
would be happy that Tails helps to make access to restricted/corporate
culture more easy, providing a framework to criticize it and create
their own."
Hi,
Anonymous wrote (07 Mar 2016 01:17:01 GMT) :
> 1. Why was dconf-editor dropped from Tails?
According to our Git history, we've never shipped it in Tails.
> 2. gedit-plugins
> This is a good package to have installed.
Please start there:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Anonymous wrote:
> 1. Why was dconf-editor dropped from Tails?
>
> I found it very useful in previous versions of Tails.
> Please reintroduce it in the next version of Tails.
>
> 2. gedit-plugins
>
> This is a good package to have