My comment was in reply to malgosia, which I do not believe is your name?
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, Dave Cramer wrote:
It most certainly was.
Exactly what did I say that was offensive ?
Dave Cramer
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 18:20, Karen Lewellen
wrote:
Perhaps because it is not present?
Karen
Perhaps because it is not present?
Karen
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, Dave Cramer wrote:
Karen,
Apparently sarcasm doesn't come through email very well.
Dave Cramer
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 18:01, Karen Lewellen via talk
wrote:
What makes it universally fun to sensor people? you indicate you kn
What makes it universally fun to sensor people? you indicate you know it
is fun...why?
I point that out because as your example illustrates generalizations tend
to make no sense, and fun must be at least understandable as fun no?
Kare
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, Malgosia Askanas via talk wrote:
S
Malgosia, Dave,
I can give you a lecture about systemic inequalities and gender bias...
In fact, based on the reactions on the mailing list today it seems to be
an urgent issue we need discuss at one of our meetings.
Here is our Code of Conduct if anyone needs a reference on how to behave
ap
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 16:58, Malgosia Askanas via talk
wrote:
> So let me understand this. If a woman (me, for example) would bemoan the
> fact that 80% of participants in a certain field of endeavor are male,
> that's not gender discrimination, right? (I assume it isn't, since it goes
> on al
So let me understand this. If a woman (me, for example) would bemoan the fact that
80% of participants in a certain field of endeavor are male, that's not gender
discrimination, right? (I assume it isn't, since it goes on all the time in all
kinds of media, without any visible censorship.) B
