D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
> ...
> So: I don't expect that we're going to see many programs that will
> stop supporting 32-bit. A greater risk is that 32-bit ports will
> become less tested. That may reduce reliability.
>
> Some distros are surely going to drop 32-bit soon. I would
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 08:56:54PM -0500, Jamon Camisso via talk wrote:
> I think you can buy Cavium ThunderX systems if you get in touch with the
> distributor in Canada. We have some of their systems in the US for arm64
> build farm purposes.
I think now you can, but even a year or two ago,
On 2018-02-14 11:06 AM, Lennart Sorensen via talk wrote:
> If it was actually possible to buy arm servers I think at least some
> people would have (I know I would have in the past), but none of the
> systems announced could actually be bought unless you were google or
> facebook or something like
On 2018-02-11 01:06 PM, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
>
> - irrelevant aside: many 64-bit ARM SOCs don't support more than 2G or
> 3G of RAM. This seems crazy to me since the first use-case of
> 64-bit is to support wider pointers.
Most ARMs are just application processors. If you're
| From: Bob Jonkman via talk
| I'm already using IceCat, so the browser isn't my problem. But the
| lack of 32-bit Chrome is the thin edge of the wedge. There will be
| other packages that will no longer be distributed for 32-bit
| architecture. Then what?
|
| But I guess we're