And don't forget that the first time you show anyone anything you've
programmed, it's going to fail regardless of how many times you have
tested it. Or, at least that's been my experience -- but perhaps I'm
the only SOB that this happens to. :-)
tedd
For me it generally works the first time
Peter Sawczynec ps-at-sun-code.com |nyphp dev/internal group use| wrote:
It is interesting to note here that iframes have a history. If I recall
correctly:
Originally, iframes were an IE only gambit and served to sidestep the
more routinely employed numbingly complex of framesets, divs, layer
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of csnyder
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 3:11 PM
To: NYPHP Talk
Subject: Re: [nyphp-talk] Thoughts on using JavaScript with no
progressivefall-back
On 2/26/07, Chris Shiflett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's th
Also, I would recommend a phone number with plenty of digits 1, 2, and
3. For THOSE types of people, the "8-0-0" is difficult to call because
the rotary dial takes a long time to return all the way back from the
zero's.
~Rolan
Kenneth Downs wrote:
Peter Sawczynec wrote:
An easy progressive
Peter Sawczynec wrote:
An easy progressive fallback for those users with JavaScript turned off
would be a nice web page with an 800-number to use and a printable form
to order by regular mail (yikes!).
LOL!
___
New York PHP Community Tal
Me, I tend to strongly push customers towards the latest common
standards that the general population at large is likely using and try
to avoid time-consuming infinitely backwards compatible constructions --
as I've done that type of development and because one ends up developing
to usage statistic
