> - Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>> Greg Troxel wrote:
>>> I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of th=
e
>>> buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we=
all
>>> think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
>> highway=3Dunclassified fo
Thank you very much,
It's my honor to be selected, I will try my best to promote OSM in
Vietnam.
See you at Amsterdam,
---
Khanh Le Ngoc Quoc
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On May 29, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns wrote:
> Should I merge
> neighbour region nodes and import seperate border lines or again
> should I leave data as is?
I may be wrong, and happy to be corrected if I am, but if the nodes
are the same physical points, you should only import
I think I worked out what was going on. Somehow, I managed to
accidentally delete most of the nodes in the way specified. The main
API, and the planet dumps will not include those nodes, so the railway
line looked all clunky and angular - but Potlatch will let you work with
the deleted nodes. I
I know that Potlatch uses a different API than the main XML based API..
but I've noticed something really quite weird.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.85278&lon=-4.89509&zoom=15&layers=B000FTF
If you look at the railway line heading to the southwest from Clarbeston
Road, in Potlatch it's a
I'd have said a pedestrian street was one which (often through conversion)
is now primarily for access on foot, and pretty much unsegregated (ie no
kerbs, and not much paving differentiation). Access varies (can be bicycles,
motorcycles or even some cars - eg Lucca in Italy). It doesn't only apply
Hi,
I wanted to ask how I should better import city and region borders.
I contacted Latvia geospatial information agency and they sent me
newest data and allowed to import them into OSM. Only thing they asked
for was that there is reference to them and they agreed that specially
created user (ht
Isn't it so that people can grep the commit comments ?
I'm finding commit comments very handy :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nic%20Roets/edits
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Gary68 wrote:
> i'm interested in this topic too. so i cross post this here. no answer
> on dev so far...
>
> gar
i'm interested in this topic too. so i cross post this here. no answer
on dev so far...
gary68
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:35 +0200, m2hu...@hsr.ch wrote:
> Hi Everyone
>
> With the danger of asking a stupid question: As I wanted to import the newest
> planet.osm file, I saw that there are changeS
2009/5/29 Greg Troxel :
>
> Isn't that highway=pedestrian exactly? As for cars I think it might
> be a physical impossibility rather than permitted / not permitted.
> (But for routing purposes it's just the same.)
well, IMHO it's not, as "pedestrian" are streets not generally allowed
to cars,
Isn't that highway=pedestrian exactly? As for cars I think it might
be a physical impossibility rather than permitted / not permitted.
(But for routing purposes it's just the same.)
I suppose it is, except that really it's highway=motorcycle.
My real point was that the whole 'highway' con
2009/5/29 Greg Troxel :
>
> I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
> buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
> think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
>
> residential doesn't imply sidewalks in my area
>
> So is there a
2009/5/29 Paul Johnson :
- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
> Greg Troxel wrote:
>> I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
>> buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
>> think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
>
> highway=u
My French is no good, so I just tried to open part of discussion here also
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:WikiProject_Corine_Land_Cover/Taggin
g_scheme. Anyway, I see from French page that the simplification ideas are
actually quite similar (e.g. forest is just one forest). We have 55% o
14 matches
Mail list logo