2009/5/29 Greg Troxel <[email protected]>: > > I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the > buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all > think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks). > > residential doesn't imply sidewalks in my area > > So is there any objection to highway=pedestrian+bicycle=yes+motorcycle=yes? > > I think the real issue is that these ways are what one would call > "public rights of way" in the UK, or "public ways" in the US, and one > can legally walk on them for no apparent reason, but they don't allow > cars.
Isn't that highway=pedestrian exactly? As for cars I think it might be a physical impossibility rather than permitted / not permitted. (But for routing purposes it's just the same.) Cheers _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
