I see some areas have been imported near here, public_transport=pay_scale_area,
for Harwich and Clacton. Is there a wiki page somewhere detailing what these
are (I'll search after sending this)?
In the case of Clacton, it looks like it was defined as a line from the coast,
inland, then back
Thanks Roger,
If they're PlusBus zones, then Clacton railway station lies outside
the Clacton zone as it currently stands, and while Harwich
International (formerly Harwich Parkeston Quay) is probably a
boundary point for the Harwich zone (though the railway station as
marked in OSM seems to be
On 7 Aug 2009, at 10:08, Ed Loach wrote:
Thanks Roger,
If they're PlusBus zones, then Clacton railway station lies outside
the Clacton zone as it currently stands, and while Harwich
International (formerly Harwich Parkeston Quay) is probably a
boundary point for the Harwich zone (though
I am not offering to create the page so hopefully someone else
will do
that. (I am doing work on cleaning up other existing transit
related
wiki pages on when I have time).
I might do a page Tag:public_transport=pay_scale_area and divert
PlusBus to that?
Google reveals these areas were
Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com schrieb:
Would it be sensible to create a PlusBus page on the wiki, and link
to it from the NaPTAN user in relation to the upload? The Wiki page
can describe what the features are about and can also be used to
list issues that need to be resolved.
I am
Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com schrieb:
Which leads to a question of terminology...
Is 'transit' a synonym for 'public transport'? or not. If not then
what is the difference?
As a non-native speaker of english I find it easier to guess what
'public transport' means compared to
On 7 Aug 2009, at 17:07, Christoph Böhme wrote:
Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com schrieb:
Which leads to a question of terminology...
Is 'transit' a synonym for 'public transport'? or not. If not then
what is the difference?
As a non-native speaker of english I find it easier to
The dilemma for for us at the main OSM Foundation is that by setting up local
chapters, our main reliable source of funding, the annual subscriptions that
members pay, may no longer come in directly. Much of that money is spent on
computer hardware to keep our sites up, and a proportion on
At 02:06 AM 7/08/2009, maning sambale wrote:
3. Local contributors have overtaken Mike Collinson's contributions.
Hehehe. I think Mike would love that to happen. Although 95% of
total ways and nodes are from the top 20 contributors. I think 80-20
would be ideal.
Yeah! No worries here!
The
V svojem odgovoru je GURS zapisal V brezplačne in nepridobitniške
namene dovoljujemo uporabo podatkov
OSM fundacija je res neprofitna ustanova, OSM projekt sam po sebi ni
profitno naravnan,
posamezniki, ki bi te podatke pripravili in uvozili s tem ne služimo.
...ampak...
Licenca OSM
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:12 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
maxspeed:school_zone=hh:mm-hh:mm[,hh:mm-hh:mm];speed
This explains what the restriction is, school zone, the times it is in effect
and the reduced speed all in one line.
That is much better than the current proposal
But there is an obvious problem: you may want two values
for the same key, e.g.
maxspeed:weather = wet;80 and
maxspeed:weather = snow;30
I'm guessing this is not OK? Actually. won't this
often be a
You would have to have some sophisticated routing software to know weather in
the
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:22 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
It's going to get very messy very quickly if you are trying to shoe horn
general time limits in with school zones, but you could do:
maxspeed=80
maxspeed:time_1=school;07:00-09:00,14:30-15:30;mon-fri;40
--- On Fri, 7/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't like the _1 and _2, but I guess you're saying
that's the only
I didn't come up with it, it's already being used for other similar things
where the same tag appears multiple times.
On Friday 31 July 2009 17:25:19 Richard Mann wrote:
I saw some strange rendering effects when a side road was straight onto a
bridge. The bridge was layer=1, so the side road was rendered on top of the
main road. That's why all the ways approaching a junction should be on the
same layer. You
Agree.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 July 2009 02:51
To: Tyler
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Do we care if its forest or wood? Natural worldmapping
...
2009/7/20 Tyler tyler.ritc...@gmail.com:
What
Prefer
Landuse=forestry (not 'forest') and natural=woodland; maybe also a tag for
the administrative areas such as US National Forests. Then other tags can
take care of the detail.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: David Lynch [mailto:djly...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 July 2009 19:10
To:
Not only on Arizona ... In the UK a 'forest' was originally a hunting area,
often owned by the king or a duke etc. who had exclusive hunting rights. The
presence or absence of trees was incidental. Some of this terminology
survives e.g. in the 'New Forest' in Hampshire where there is a wooded area
Hi,
I think the logo is under a CC license, BUT you should be more concerned
about using an OSMF trademark and there is a whole separate set of laws for
that.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trademark#OpenStreetMap_logo_.28UK.29
Fortunately OSMF is quite relaxed about the trademark issue: If
Am Samstag, den 01.08.2009, 22:45 +0200 schrieb Martijn van Oosterhout:
It's still on hypercube and it's not super fast, but it does appear to
work. Let me know if you see something odd.
It seems that there is a problem with very small islands. They are
reported as buggy even if they seem to be
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:11:07PM +0200, Vincent MEURISSE wrote:
On Monday 03 August 2009 20:09:23 SLXViper wrote:
www.openstreetmap.is and osm.is weren't mentioned as far as I could see.
Both redirect to the normal openstreetmap.org domain.
I added them to the list
I also created a wiki
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Andre Hinrichsandre.hinri...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Samstag, den 01.08.2009, 22:45 +0200 schrieb Martijn van Oosterhout:
It's still on hypercube and it's not super fast, but it does appear to
work. Let me know if you see something odd.
It seems that there is a
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Lambert Carstenlhc@solcon.nl wrote:
In any case, PLEASE let us get rid of this 'rule' that a T-junction has to be
on the same layer.
+1
Pieren
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Friday 31 July 2009 17:25:19 Richard Mann wrote:
I saw some strange rendering effects when a side road was straight onto
a
bridge. The bridge was layer=1, so the side road was rendered on top of
the
main road. That's why all the ways approaching a junction should be on
the
same
problem if you insist on not putting values in the key? How
would you
say maxspeed is 40 between 7am-9am, 60 between 4pm-7pm, and
80
otherwise?
It's going to get very messy very quickly if you are trying to shoe horn
general time limits in with school zones
But that's the point! We
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 02:55:05 + (GMT)
Von: John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com
An: m...@koppenhoefer.com, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com
CC: talk@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [OSM-talk] [RFC] restriction=school_zone (second email)
--- On
--- On Fri, 7/8/09, Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net wrote:
But that's the point! We need a way of modelling more
complex cases anyway, so why do you want to special case
school zones?
School zones are a special case because they don't operate all year round, and
you need to store school terms
Keepright appears to think that bridges without a layer tag imply layer=1.
Whereas I'd assumed in my tagging that layer=0 unless stated. Is this to
match what renderers do? I would rather they didn't, because making the
waterways layer=-1 seems to work most of the time, and I'd prefer to avoid
Hi,
Its time for a mini mapping party in Electronics city in South Bangalore.
Its planned as half day event on 09/09/09
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Electronics_City_Mini_Mapping_Party_August_2009
Please join in if you are around and have some time.
Regards,
Pradeep B V
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Pradeep B V wrote:
Its planned as half day event on 09/09/09
09/08/09 my style of dates
08/09/09 US style of dates
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
But that's the point! We need a way of modelling more
complex cases anyway, so why do you want to special case
school zones?
School zones are a special case because they don't operate all year round,
and you need to store school terms in addition so you can calculate if the
school zone
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Pradeep B V wrote:
Its planned as half day event on 09/09/09
09/08/09 my style of dates
08/09/09 US style of dates
Oops... my mistake.
Its 09/Aug/2009 and not 09/Sep/09 as the subject made it out to be.
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/4 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
Talking with my friends in Kosovo
the laptops are underpowered and hang using JOSM
the laptops are underpowered and hang using the browser and hence
Potlatch the power supply is completely intermitttent
the
--- On Fri, 7/8/09, Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net wrote:
Let me rephrase the question: if it is possible to devise a
tagging scheme that is able to model all relevant
restrictions we encounter in reality including school zones
(and I believe it is possible), why do you still want a
seperate
Hi
Not really sure if this is the right place to ask, but I wanted to leave a
comment on the Opengeodata.org website and you need to login first. However,
there's nowhere listed to register. Does anyone know how to do this on
there?
Cheers
Mike
___
Mike Ryan wrote:
Hi
Not really sure if this is the right place to ask, but I wanted to leave
a comment on the Opengeodata.org website and you need to login first.
However, there's nowhere listed to register. Does anyone know how to do
this on there?
I appears to be disabled at the moment.
On 7 Aug 2009, at 12:46, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/4 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
Talking with my friends in Kosovo
the laptops are underpowered and hang using JOSM
the laptops are underpowered and hang using the browser and hence
Potlatch the
I am pleased to note that the assignment of the OSM logo to the
Foundation is published as of 31 July 2009 on the IPO/UK site.
http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/tm/t-os/t-find/t-find-number?detailsrequested=Ctrademark=2500155
Congratulations!
I see that the European trademark # 7366859, OpenStreetMap
What's even more interesting is that even North Korea isn't completely
blank: http://osm.org/go/55eX1@
Regards,
Igor
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Jeffrey Martin dogs...@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed a lot of new data on Korea.
Who is working on Korea and is there a separate email list?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.ukwrote:
I don't think that we have enough streets mapped yet to make walking
papers
useful in kosovo
I guess it also needs a scanner available to rescan the maps
You don't need to rescan them, as you can just use
Hi,
I don't know whether anybody has already written about this here (I did
a quick search but couldn't find anything related). So here for those
who are interested:
In July there was an announcement on the german mailing list that a
Google-Streetview competitor allows openstreetmap
On Friday 07 August 2009 12:29:09 Marc Schütz wrote:
On Friday 31 July 2009 17:25:19 Richard Mann wrote:
I saw some strange rendering effects when a side road was straight onto
a
bridge. The bridge was layer=1, so the side road was rendered on top of
the
main road. That's
On Aug 7, 2009, at 12:44 AM, Mike Harris wrote:
Prefer
Landuse=forestry (not 'forest') and natural=woodland; maybe also a
tag for
the administrative areas such as US National Forests. Then other
tags can
take care of the detail.
some US National forests are nearly tree free. We
John Smith wrote:
For general time based restrictions you can still do it in one
line if you must, without needing to parse variable information
in the key section:
maxspeed:time=12:00-23:59;tu,th;50
hh:mm-hh:mm;[dd,dd,dd|dd-dd];speed
The second sign in this page
2009/8/7 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Richard
Mannrichard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
As indicated, I've had a go at a rewrite of the unclassified page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
I've added my thoughts to the
*Hi All,
I've been out gathering some more GPS traces to map unmapped parts of
Nottinghamshire and have come across a few barriers which are signed
Emergency Access Only
These are basically raised sections of pavement put across the road the
prevent people driving round them, but which allow
2009/8/7 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
By the way, the outcome of this discussion could well be applicable to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extended_conditions_for_access_tags
i.e., what we have so far for school_zone could be generalised to:
+1, if we find
2009/8/7 Kev o...@kevswindells.eu:
*Hi All,
I've been out gathering some more GPS traces to map unmapped parts of
Nottinghamshire and have come across a few barriers which are signed
Emergency Access Only
For the time being I have tagged the one I came across as
highway=footway (by
Hi All,
While trying (and failing miserably) to find a parking space in
Birmingham (UK) the other day (terrible sign age - talk about leaving it
to the last minute - AND to top it all I must have parked in the one
multi-story not already mapped on OSM in Brimingham) it got me thinking
about
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/7 Kev o...@kevswindells.eu:
*Hi All,
I've been out gathering some more GPS traces to map unmapped parts of
Nottinghamshire and have come across a few barriers which are signed
Emergency Access Only
For the time being I have tagged the one I came across
Kev wrote:
Presumably in this case
highway=residential
access=emergency; foot; bicycle
I wouldn't want to cycle over the surface your quoted picture showed! It
doesn't say emergency access except cycles and it would be an offence
to cycle through on the footway.
OTOH, since it doesn't use
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Kev o...@kevswindells.eu wrote:
Presumably in this case
highway=residential
access=emergency; foot; bicycle
barrier=entrance
access=emergency
bicycle=yes
foot=yes
on a node might be better
Richard
___
talk mailing
sidewalks in villages - what to do?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.172898lon=-0.524788zoom=18
are they footpaths or are they road attributes?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Footway
(probably footpaths if it's at all complicated, since the paths can
make detours
Richard Mann wrote:
barrier=entrance
access=emergency
bicycle=yes
foot=yes
on a node might be better
access=emergency?
According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access, emergency is
a transport mode key, so it should be
access=no
+ emergency=yes
(I don't think *=emergency is
Um, since the footway in question might reasonably be construed not to be
adjacent to a roadway, I'm not 100% convinced it'd actually be illegal to
cycle on it. But I'd leave it to local judgement whether it was regarded as
acceptable to cycle there.
Richard
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:14 PM, David
I have a question concerning POI's. How should i handel POI's reporting
this information DISTANCE: 518043.59 m, DISTANCE: 517980.06 m etc.
etc. (see http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=46.32lon=9.4203zoom=14)
Should I remove this POI's ?
Thank you
Alex
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:20 PM, OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com wrote:
sidewalks in villages - what to do?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.172898lon=-0.524788zoom=18
are they footpaths or are they road attributes?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Footway
If it's
ad...@ticino.com wrote:
I have a question concerning POI's. How should i handel POI's reporting
this information DISTANCE: 518043.59 m, DISTANCE: 517980.06 m etc.
etc. (see http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=46.32lon=9.4203zoom=14)
Should I remove this POI's ?
I'd first ask the creator
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009, OJ W wrote:
sidewalks in villages - what to do?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.172898lon=-0.524788zoom=18
are they footpaths or are they road attributes?
are you thinking of a paved section intended for walking, or just the space
which here could be grass, rough
2009/8/7 OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com:
sidewalks in villages - what to do?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.172898lon=-0.524788zoom=18
are they footpaths or are they road attributes?
IMHO generally it would be better to have all those things (like
lanes) mapped separatly, and the
2009/8/7 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
Richard Mann wrote:
barrier=entrance
access=emergency
bicycle=yes
foot=yes
on a node might be better
access=emergency?
According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access, emergency is
a transport mode key, so it should be
access=no
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote
I can't really see the point of not putting values in keys
actually. Aren't we already doing this in many tags?
why is this a value in the key:
maxspeed:wet=40
couldn't you interpret maxspeed:wet as a key? The maxspeed in wet
condition? Could you explain the
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
How is routing going to know that you can cross the road if you're on
a sidewalk footpath and there's another one 8m away across a
residential road?
AFAIK that's an open question. IMHO this will have to be
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:12 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Fri, 7/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't like the _1 and _2, but I guess you're saying
that's the only
I didn't come up with it, it's already being used for other similar things
where the
2009/8/8 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
Forget about the renderer for a second. IMHO we should tag what is on
the ground. As the wiki says, layer is used to mark if a
way/node/area is above or under another one, where is above or
under clearly refers to the physical reality. It's not
On Friday 07 Aug 2009 23:15:39 OJ W wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
How is routing going to know that you can cross the road if you're on
a sidewalk footpath and there's another one 8m away across a
residential road?
AFAIK
2009/8/8 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net:
I'm not clear about the benefit of getting this complicated! That's a lot of
extra work!
sure. It's a project for the future, when everything is already mapped
;-), say next year.
Also, how will a routing engine know if a way without parallel
footways
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 1:24 AM, Lars Aronssonl...@aronsson.se wrote:
John Smith wrote:
For general time based restrictions you can still do it in one
line if you must, without needing to parse variable information
in the key section:
maxspeed:time=12:00-23:59;tu,th;50
Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com writes:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:20 PM, OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com wrote:
sidewalks in villages - what to do?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.172898lon=-0.524788zoom=18
are they footpaths or are they road attributes?
are you thinking of a paved section intended for walking, or just the
space
which here could be grass, rough ground, or even gardened?
a paved surface intended for walking
there are places in my village where you can walk on the grass next to
the road - I've been marking them as 'no
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
why is this a value in the key:
maxspeed:wet=40
couldn't you interpret maxspeed:wet as a key? The maxspeed in wet
condition? Could you explain the problem that arises (I am not an
informatics person and maybe for
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Kevo...@kevswindells.eu wrote:
Hi All,
While trying (and failing miserably) to find a parking space in Birmingham
(UK) the other day (terrible sign age - talk about leaving it to the last
minute - AND to top it all I must have parked in the one multi-story not
Hey my name is Austin Martin, I recently got registered on OpenStreetMap
(wiki and map), because I heard about it on FLOSS Weekly, Wednesday (though
I have volunteered to help FLOSS projects for a while now, know how most
work, and have heard about/visited the site before). So I thought I might
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Tobias Knerro...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
- conditions in values:
Also possible, but means all information of the same category (e.g. all
maxspeeds) will be in a single value, which will result in rather long
tags. It will also break existing applications unless
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/8 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
Forget about the renderer for a second. IMHO we should tag what is on
the ground. As the wiki says, layer is used to mark if a
way/node/area is above or under another
I haven't been participating for awhile, but wasn't some committee going to
come up
with a solution?
Ideally there would be separate tagging systems for all the different
classes of information, e.g.
surface type, width, number of lanes; route numbers and codes, government
classification,
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Tobias Knerro...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Roy Wallace wrote:
You don't need all maxspeeds to be in a single value. Nor would it
break existing applications. Maxspeed=* is still maxspeed=*. You would
be adding additional keys such as maxspeed:time, or
2009/8/8 Jeffrey Martin dogs...@gmail.com:
Ideally there would be separate tagging systems for all the different
classes of information, e.g.
surface type, width, number of lanes; route numbers and codes, government
classification,
popularity, etc.; and then the renderer would figure out how
On 06/08/2009, at 12:58 AM, Renaud Martinet wrote:
There has been a lot of discussion on the talk-fr list but once we
came to a consensus,
it was easy to put in place because we have our own MapFeatures
page. Probably
you should have one also...
That might work for countries where
hoi,
ik weet het niet zeker, maar volgens mij heb ik iets vergelijkbaars gehad.
in postgis worden alle veldnamen met kleine letters geschreven. dus ik denk dat
je ergens in je mapfile veldnamen met hoofdletters hebt geschreven
succes!
Steven
http://www.rugbyopdekaart.nl
Date: Fri, 7 Aug
Hoi allen,
Voor een nog ubergeheim project dat niet zo geheim meer is als ik het op
talk-nl post heb ik exacte halte coordinaten nodig. Ik heb al eerder
gemeld dat ik een 'lijstje' heb gekregen.
Maar ik heb daarvan al emperisch bewezen dat deze lijst slechts op 50m
naukeurig is. Ik zou je
Hoi,
Wil je de haltes van heel NL hebben of alleen van Amsterdam?
Groeten, Tijn
Stefan de Konink wrote:
Hoi allen,
Voor een nog ubergeheim project dat niet zo geheim meer is als ik het op
talk-nl post heb ik exacte halte coordinaten nodig. Ik heb al eerder
gemeld dat ik een 'lijstje'
Ik pik er even een aantal mee vanmiddag!
floris
Stefan de Konink wrote:
Hoi allen,
Voor een nog ubergeheim project dat niet zo geheim meer is als ik het op
talk-nl post heb ik exacte halte coordinaten nodig. Ik heb al eerder
gemeld dat ik een 'lijstje' heb gekregen.
Maar ik heb daarvan
Steven,
Dank je wel, ik had inderdaad in de style sectie een paar colommen waarop
ik selecteerde om de kleur te bepalen van een vlak, en dezen waren in
hoofdletters geschreven. Die directe link had ik nog niet gelegd. Het werkt
nu.
Gert Jan.
Op 7 augustus 2009 14:48 schreef Steven Schreuder
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Tijn Buijs wrote:
Wil je de haltes van heel NL hebben of alleen van Amsterdam?
Groot denken; heel NL :)
Ik weet dat we van het Stadsgewest Haaglanden routes hebben (haltes heb ik
nog niet uit de Shapefile kunnen halen).
Stefan
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
Ik pik er even een aantal mee vanmiddag!
Thanks!
Stefan
___
Talk-nl mailing list
Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
On Friday 07 August 2009 11:32:07 Rejo Zenger wrote:
++ 06/08/09 13:07 +0200 - Lambert Carsten:
Mijn voorstel zou zijn om het perron niet als area maar als way te
tekenen.
Waarom is dat?
Ik zie de toegevoegde waarde van een perron als area niet. Integendeel het
maakt al die 'ways' die
On Friday 07 August 2009 14:50:47 Stefan de Konink wrote:
Hoi allen,
Voor een nog ubergeheim project dat niet zo geheim meer is als ik het op
talk-nl post heb ik exacte halte coordinaten nodig. Ik heb al eerder
gemeld dat ik een 'lijstje' heb gekregen.
Maar ik heb daarvan al emperisch
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Lambert Carsten wrote:
On Friday 07 August 2009 14:50:47 Stefan de Konink wrote:
Hoi allen,
Voor een nog ubergeheim project dat niet zo geheim meer is als ik het op
talk-nl post heb ik exacte halte coordinaten nodig. Ik heb al eerder
gemeld dat ik een 'lijstje'
On Friday 07 August 2009 17:28:37 Stefan de Konink wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Lambert Carsten wrote:
On Friday 07 August 2009 14:50:47 Stefan de Konink wrote:
Hoi allen,
Voor een nog ubergeheim project dat niet zo geheim meer is als ik het
op talk-nl post heb ik exacte halte
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Lambert Carsten wrote:
Maar die moeten toch geïntegreerd worden in een route relation o.i.d.?
(ik hoop dat ik geen spijt krijg van die vraag)
Niets moet :) Gezien relaties momenteel zo 'dom' in elkaar zitten. Gaan we
dat eerst eens goed fixen voordat ik iemand vraag routes
On Friday 07 August 2009 19:43:05 Stefan de Konink wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Lambert Carsten wrote:
Maar die moeten toch geïntegreerd worden in een route relation o.i.d.?
(ik hoop dat ik geen spijt krijg van die vraag)
Niets moet :) Gezien relaties momenteel zo 'dom' in elkaar zitten. Gaan
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Lambert Carsten wrote:
Ja maar, hoe, waar? Op openstreetphoto.org zie ik niets over uploaden.
De wiki :)
Stefan
___
Talk-nl mailing list
Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
Does the ABS have other boundaries which we can use for this? For example
Sydney currently would just refer to the Sydney LGA, rather than that area
which people would call Greater Sydney.
Basically, do they publish boundaries such as greater sydney the newcastle
region etc?
If they don't
--- On Fri, 7/8/09, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
I'm just trying to brainstorm a way of achieving what
you're describing while still conforming to strict
boundary sources as opposed to drawing a boundary around a
town by hand.
As far as I'm aware this is the
Anyone going to the Ekka to map out the showgrounds better?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?zoom=18lat=-27.45092lon=153.03295
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
I had a play around wit Inkscape and 5mins later had come up with this:
http://www.overclockers.com.au/pix/st7vm
The link is to a transparent png so it doesn't look right with the dark blue
background of the hosting service but such is life.
I can't post the svg to the list without moderator
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Tags for that purpose are already described on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel
I just noticed this url on that page:
http://www.osmfuel.org
map/site for searching fuel locations
Still short on listing
That looks good, but...
penStreetMap
It's not obvious to the layman that the magnifying glass is supposed to be
an O. And because pen is a common word many people will misread this as
penStreetMap which makes about as much sense as OpenStreetMap if you've
never heard of either.
I'd strongly
Just make sure you don't go to the effort mapping stuff which will be bulldozed
for the redevelopment.
From: John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, 7 August, 2009 5:38:30 PM
Subject: [talk-au] RNA Showgrounds/Ekka
1 - 100 of 301 matches
Mail list logo
