On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:28:30 +0100, nixa wrote:
probao s sudo
Naravno da sam probao kao root takodjer. Plav sam ali ne toliko ;)
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user
Valent Turkovic wrote:
Ako je vjerovati unisima u hrvatskom dnevniku samo dvojica mappera nesto
rade: http://www.openstreetmap.org/diary/hr
offtopic
Valent vidim da si aktivan, ali neznam koliko često citas poruke na
openstreetmapu, daj pogledaj imas jednu od mene vezano za zeljeznice
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:30:41PM +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:18:30 +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pymedia/muxer.so: cannot
restore segment prot after reloc: Permission denied
Ugasi SElinux ?
/usr/sbin/setenforce 0
ili
2009/12/17 Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org:
On Thursday 17 Dec 2009 1:03:16 pm Andreas Labres wrote:
Patrick from talk-at found this by chance:
http://openmaps.eu/
They seem to be reinventing the wheel, somehow...
license looks proprietary
From their copyright page:
As our name
I've added another OSM graph to the stats page. It shows the % contribution
of ways (current table, no account for history) per editor. It reveals that
95% of the way data is contributed by just 10% of the contributor base. In
fact 50% of way data has been contributed by just 31 user accounts
The quality of OpenStreetMap's work speaks for itself, but it seems that
we need to speak about it too - especially now that Google is attempting
to to appear as holding the moral high ground by using terms such as
citizen cartographer that they rob of its meaning by conveniently
forgetting to
2009/12/17 Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org
The quality of OpenStreetMap's work speaks for itself, but it seems that
we need to speak about it too - especially now that Google is attempting
to to appear as holding the moral high ground by using terms such as
citizen cartographer that they
2009/12/17 Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com:
2009/12/17 Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org
The quality of OpenStreetMap's work speaks for itself, but it seems that
we need to speak about it too - especially now that Google is attempting
to to appear as holding the moral high ground
2009/12/17 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
What a pity the whole basis for Copenhagen is a complete and utter
sham, it's true global warming is man made, the moment some men
started fudging the figures and lying about anything that disagreed
with political agendas.
Sure the world is
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:24 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
What a pity the whole basis for Copenhagen is a complete and utter
sham, it's true global warming is man made, the moment some men
started fudging the figures and lying about anything that disagreed
with political
Hmm, no one thought of registering Open Maps as a trademark as well as
OpenStreetMap?
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Andreas Labres l...@lab.at wrote:
Patrick from talk-at found this by chance:
http://openmaps.eu/
They seem to be reinventing the wheel, somehow...
/al
2009/12/17 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Hmm, no one thought of registering Open Maps as a trademark as well as
OpenStreetMap?
Weren't you the one agreeing with me that the words open and free
have been abused too much and are too ambigious the other day?
Hi,
Steve Bennett wrote:
Hmm, no one thought of registering Open Maps as a trademark as well as
OpenStreetMap?
What makes you think that if OpenStreetMap is a term deemed to general
to work as a trademark, Open Maps would somehow work?
Bye
Frederik
As much as it is disappointing to see others work on a similar/the same
project, I don't think it makes sense for a group of people that have open
in their title to block others from doing something through trademark law.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
I've added another OSM graph to the stats page. It shows the % contribution
of ways (current table, no account for history) per editor. It reveals that
95% of the way data is contributed by just 10% of the contributor base. In
fact 50% of way data has
Hi all,
As we all know, you don't tag for the renderer. However, you want your
map data to render nicely now, and you want correct map data in the long
term.
Suggestion: introduce a fallback tag.
For example, around my city there are little reserves - patches of grass
reserved by the
2009/12/17 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
What do people think? (No comments on how to tag land reserves, it's just an
example...)
Nice idea, but you are painting yourself into a corner as you limit
the fall back to a single option.
It'd be better if you could go from most specific to
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
As we all know, you don't tag for the renderer. However, you want your
map data to render nicely now, and you want correct map data in the long
term.
Suggestion: introduce a fallback tag.
For example,
2009/12/17 Shalabh shalab...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
As we all know, you don't tag for the renderer. However, you want your
map data to render nicely now, and you want correct map data in the long
term.
Suggestion:
What do people think? (No comments on how to tag land reserves, it's
just an example...)
Tagging for and only or the renderer is a bad idea. Better sind in a
patch to the mapnik xml, to that (in your example) landuse=reserve is
rendered accordingly, or tag as landuse=park, reserve=yes.
Hi,
Steve Bennett wrote:
Solution: tag it like this:
landuse=reserve
fallback:leisure=park
This makes only sense if there are certain landuse=reserve areas that
you want to fall back to leisure=park and other landuse=reserve areas
that are more like a natural=grass. And this would then mean
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Shalabh shalab...@gmail.com wrote:
1. And what if even the 'fallback tag' is not rendered by the renderer?
That's the current situation. So, the worst case scenario, with this tag,
is...what we have now. Every other case is an improvement.
2. Some things
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Shalabh shalab...@gmail.com wrote:
1. And what if even the 'fallback tag' is not rendered by the renderer?
That's the current situation. So, the worst case scenario, with this tag,
to know that at least *something* will render.
This seems like a confusing proposal to ensure that a tiny fraction of
a percentage of the whitespace on OSM.org gets *something* rendered in
it.
-1 from me.
2009/12/17 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Shalabh
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.dewrote:
Tagging for and only or the renderer is a bad idea. Better sind in a
patch to the mapnik xml,
With respect, fix the renderer is not a solution to how do I tag in such
a way that current and future renderers will
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Shalabh shalab...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, for this approach to even start making sense, there has to be TAG
FAMILY TREE covering each known tag such that each has fallback options
going up to a certain level. And then each renderer should follow the TAG
2009/12/17 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Nah. Only the smart mappers would even think of using it.
And people that CP...
Nah. It doesn't matter enough. I would see it mostly as a personal thing for
the mapper, to know that at least *something* will render.
Don't tag it until your
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Joseph Reeves iknowjos...@gmail.comwrote:
This seems like a confusing proposal to ensure that a tiny fraction of
a percentage of the whitespace on OSM.org gets *something* rendered in
it.
No, it's a proposal to encourage people to tag for the future and to
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:15 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
Don't tag it until your feature request to update mapnik's style sheet
is put into production...
That's completely at odds with standard OSM advice: tag however you want.
So file a feature request against mapnik's
On Thursday 17 December 2009, John Smith wrote:
What a pity the whole basis for Copenhagen is a complete and utter
sham, it's true global warming is man made, the moment some men
started fudging the figures and lying about anything that disagreed
with political agendas.
Sure the world is
Hi,
Steve Bennett wrote:
My strategy:
1) I want to tag Y instead of X.
2) I tag Y, fallback:X
3) I get on with my life. Renderers will catch up whenever.
My strategy:
1) I want to tag Y
2) I tag Y
3) I get on with my life. Renderers will catch up whenever.
Bye
Frederik
Hi,
Robert Scott wrote:
Oh look another non-scientist giving his authoritative opinions about climate
science.
THIS is what I want to hear on osm-talk.
I'd love to hear about the nationality of the US president, the veracity
of the moon landing, and chemtrails as well. Oh, and someone in
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Steve Bennett wrote:
My strategy:
1) I want to tag Y instead of X.
2) I tag Y, fallback:X
3) I get on with my life. Renderers will catch up whenever.
My strategy:
1) I want to tag Y
2) I tag Y
3) I get on with my life. Renderers will catch up
Hmm, no one thought of registering Open Maps as a trademark as well
as
OpenStreetMap?
What makes you think that if OpenStreetMap is a term deemed to general
to work as a trademark, Open Maps would somehow work?
In any case, we are supposed to be open. Trying to trademark names merely
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Steve Bennett wrote:
My strategy:
1) I want to tag Y instead of X.
2) I tag Y, fallback:X
3) I get on with my life. Renderers will catch up whenever.
My strategy:
1) I want to tag Y
2) I tag Y
3) I get
2009/12/17 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hi,
Robert Scott wrote:
Oh look another non-scientist giving his authoritative opinions about
climate science.
THIS is what I want to hear on osm-talk.
I'd love to hear about the nationality of the US president, the veracity
of the moon
2009/12/17 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
That's completely at odds with standard OSM advice: tag however you want.
You only want to tag stuff that renders, so update the render style
sheet then tag it, if you don't care about it rendering first just tag
it but your comments are specifically
Tagging for and only or the renderer is a bad idea. Better sind in a
patch to the mapnik xml,
With respect, fix the renderer is not a solution to how do I tag in
such a way that current and future renderers will produce an acceptable
result?
Why not?
to that (in your
2009/12/17 Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk:
On Thursday 17 December 2009, John Smith wrote:
What a pity the whole basis for Copenhagen is a complete and utter
sham, it's true global warming is man made, the moment some men
started fudging the figures and lying about anything that disagreed
4) And maybe I do some rendering myself...
Richard
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Steve Bennett wrote:
My strategy:
1) I want to tag Y instead of X.
2) I tag Y, fallback:X
3) I get on with my life. Renderers will catch up whenever.
My
2009/12/17 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
4) And maybe I do some rendering myself...
I actually offered him help/resources the other week on the talk-au
list with regards to style sheets, perhaps I was a little too subtle
:)
___
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
The quality of OpenStreetMap's work speaks for itself, but it seems that
we need to speak about it too - especially now that Google is attempting
to to appear as holding the moral high ground by using terms such as
On 06/12/09 21:34, Lars Francke wrote:
1) What should I do with namespaced tags. I mean all tags with
colons in them to separate parts of the key. Examples are the tiger
tags (tiger:tlid, ...), the Karlsruhe schema for addresses (addr:),
name tags (name:de) or the seamark tags used by
My suggestion is for some coordinated session between SOTM/Wikimania .. perhaps
a live stream of a presentation on the OSM maps in Wikipedia from Wikimania to
SOTM?
== Mikel Maron ==
http://mapkibera.org/
+254 (0) 724899738
mi...@osmfoundation.org
From:
El Jueves, 17 de Diciembre de 2009, Mikel Maron escribió:
My suggestion is for some coordinated session between SOTM/Wikimania ..
perhaps a live stream of a presentation on the OSM maps in Wikipedia from
Wikimania to SOTM?
Let me check if the SotM venue has the appropiate facilities for this.
We could hire a Mapping Matatu :). A matatu is the main form of public
transport in Kenya, described as a cross between a sports car, a minibus, and
a night club
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Share_taxi#Matatu_.28Kenya.2FUganda.29
== Mikel Maron ==
http://mapkibera.org/
+254 (0) 724899738
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:47 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
You only want to tag stuff that renders, so update the render style
sheet then tag it, if you don't care about it rendering first just tag
it but your comments are specifically about wanting them to render
first.
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Oh, and someone in Ireland
has just released a motor that produces more energy than it consumes.
Apart from the massive D cell powering it, you mean?
http://blogs.zdnet.co.uk/news-blog/#10014630
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
There may be arguments against my proposed solution. There may be better
solutions. It may not be a big problem. But, please, these one-off
workarounds and hacks are not solutions.
Steve
Actually Steve, I think your
2009/12/18 Shalabh shalab...@gmail.com:
So, lets map and wait for the renderers to catch up.
Or if he were really serious about this he'd come up with a suitable
break down list of most specific to least specific way existing tags
already in use could render and then provide suitable patches for
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:47 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
Or if he were really serious about this he'd come up with a suitable
Was this mailing list always like this? I don't get it. I make a sincere
suggestion for a tag that I think would be useful, and just look at the
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Nick Whitelegg
nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
In any case, we are supposed to be open. Trying to trademark names merely
similar to our own is one of the most closed, monopolistic actions that
it's possible to take. The idea of OSM is to collect and make
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:47 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
Or if he were really serious about this he'd come up with a suitable
Was this mailing list always like this? I don't get it. I make a sincere
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.orgwrote:
If you have a certain fallback hierarchy that says dear renderers of the
world, if you encounter something tagged landuse=reserve and you don't
Steve Bennett wrote:
Hi all,
As we all know, you don't tag for the renderer. However, you want
your map data to render nicely now, and you want correct map data in
the long term.
Suggestion: introduce a fallback tag.
For example, around my city there are little reserves - patches of
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Steve Bennett wrote:
My strategy:
1) I want to tag Y instead of X.
2) I tag Y, fallback:X
3) I get on with my life. Renderers will catch up whenever.
My strategy:
1) I want to tag Y
2) I tag Y
3) I get on with my life. Renderers will catch up
Steve Bennett wrote:
I'm not looking for someone to tell me how to edit a stylesheet and
hack mapnik to produce a particular result on my machine.
But, Steve, that's precisely what you should be doing.
And these are not solutions:
4) File a feature request
5) Fix the renderer myself and
Intriguing, Andy. Thanks for adding this.
Would be nice to be able to filter out the import-users when producing these
stats, however. Is that feasible?
Martijn
On Dec 17, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
I've added another OSM graph to the stats page. It shows the %
Steve Bennett wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:47 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Or if he were really serious about this he'd come up with a suitable
Was this mailing list always like this? I don't get it. I make a
sincere suggestion
First, thanks for the thoughtful replies, everyone. I'll reply to all in one
email.
It is just that I dont see your solution as a scalable one
What's not scalable about it - presumably that you have to tag a fall back
every time you use the tag? What's an alternative that's more scalable, for
Martijn van Exel [mailto:mve...@gmail.com] wrote:
Sent: 17 December 2009 4:04 PM
To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Contribution graph
Intriguing, Andy. Thanks for adding this.
Would be nice to be able to filter out the import-users when
Steve Bennett wrote:
For example, around my city there are little reserves - patches of
grass reserved by the government for future development such as
freeways or train lines. They often get tagged leisure=park, but
say I want to start tagging them landuse=reserve instead. Suddenly,
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 14:13, Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com wrote:
My suggestion is for some coordinated session between SOTM/Wikimania ..
perhaps a live stream of a presentation on the OSM maps in Wikipedia
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
The quality of OpenStreetMap's work speaks for itself, but it seems that
we need to speak about it too - especially now that Google is attempting
to to
2009/12/17 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
In the end, OSM is a database, and how you are rendering a map is
something accessory, as everyone can set up the rendering the way they
want. It is the greatest strength of OSM that you can choose what kind of
rendering you can do. I think the map
2009/12/18 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
As others have stated this should have gone to the tagging mailing list.
What's not scalable about it - presumably that you have to tag a fall back
Your suggestion as is only copes with 1 alternative, rather than
gracefully falling back to less
2009/12/18 Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com:
But for the time being, if you want a custom rendering you will be using
your own pc or server. If you are interested in a relatively simple
If he wants to play about I have an instance of mapnik he can play
with setup already.
He could also
Steve Bennett wrote:
IMVHO, that approach is harmful in general (have you *seen* how many
different tags are out there?), and ironic in this instance.
Yes, unless I'm missing something your proposal just adds the long list.
If it's use *now *is a park, tag it as a park.
When if (and that's
Then just start using your fallback tag. There's no need to tell the list
about it.
IMVHO, that approach is harmful in general (have you *seen* how many
different tags are out there?), and ironic in this instance.
Honestly, I don't see the harm in having lots of tags that everyone else can
On 12/16/2009 11:22 PM, Tirkon wrote:
MediaWiki search is pretty weak in general.
No problem at Wikipedia
The problem might be that OpenStreetMap wiki is running an old version
(1.13 vs 1.16 at wikipedia) of wikimedia. IIRC, search has been improved
a lot. Who could update mediawiki?
2009/12/18 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Honestly, I don't see the harm in having lots of tags that everyone else can
happily ignore. At least, not when they're added by hand. The only real
harm is a small fraction of space in the database. When it comes to massive
imports (tiger:*=*) or editor
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:41 AM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.orgwrote:
The quality of OpenStreetMap's work speaks for itself, but it seems that
we need to speak
Instead of trying to counter the googlespeak wouldn't it be better to think
about why they feel the need to do this kind of thing in the first place
rather than sponsoring an OSM based venture. Similarly, why are companies
like waze trying to start from scratch rather than using our data for
2009/12/18 Kevin Peat ke...@kevinpeat.com:
If it is because of the license then we should take the opportunity to make
sure our new license is friendly to these kind of applications and uses as
what is the point of creating a free map if only a minority of people are
ever going to see it.
Hi,
Jaak Laineste wrote:
I discovered that the files in http://planet.openstreetmap.org/daily/
and http://planet.openstreetmap.org/history/ are slightly different,
If there are two changes to the same object in the scope of one day,
then the normal diff will only contain the newset version,
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Dave F. wrote:
Replies are in the negative because they think your idea is poor for the
reasons stated. It's as simple as that.
unfortunately the contents of this list are dominated by people who are
negative writing negative comments
I note overall a lack of creative
Steve Bennett wrote:
Solution: tag it like this:
landuse=reserve
fallback:leisure=park
Lets assume that your fallback tag isn't just a less specific type of
object than the real tag (in that case, a tag hierarchy - as it is used
with amenity=parking + parking=*, for example - would solve the
Found by slashme today in the Nevada saltpans, but apparently been there over
one year
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/slashme/diary/8968
all of these changesets
367363
266357
272488
293410
302378
621338
187907
324014
365985
___
talk mailing list
It's the Burning Man Festival and it was recently a Featured Image on
the wiki.
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Featured_Images/Jul-Sep_2009#Week_36)
Kevin
On 12/17/2009 2:30 PM, Liz wrote:
Found by slashme today in the Nevada saltpans, but apparently been there over
one year
set-mapnik-env customize-mapnik-map osm.xml
I try it in cygwin bash on win and get:
bash: set-mapnik-env: command not found
You'll have to call ./set-mapnik-env ...
But you don't need this anymore. just copy the inc/*.template to remove
the .template suffix and customize the settings there.
Peter Körner wrote:
But you don't need this anymore. just copy the inc/*.template to remove
the .template suffix and customize the settings there. Then just point
mapnik to the osm.xml, it will load the files from inc/.
Or, run the generate-xml.py script.
PS: It's getting slightly annoying
Andreas Labres wrote:
Patrick from talk-at found this by chance:
http://openmaps.eu/
They seem to be reinventing the wheel, somehow...
I sent their proeminent members (papa71, kepenu, KiVi, peter68, Trackman
and BigMick) a gentle enquiry through their forum's internal mail
system; that's
Sam Vekemans wrote:
Where the only way i know to map it is to use a relation and call it
route=greenway and dont have it render on the cyclemap. Just map the
sections as appropriate.
Greenway is the US/Canadianism for cycleway.
___
talk mailing
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
that, and that would be appropriate for reserves, too. But some other
renderer might write park all over the area or do something else that
makes the rendering completely inappropriate for the feature. What if I
use
should be deleted then. Burning man follows a no trace policy. as
alternative it must be at least tagged different to disappear from maps.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Kevin Samples ksamp...@uga.edu wrote:
It's the Burning Man Festival and it was recently a Featured Image on
the wiki.
Hi,
Alexrk wrote:
The projection is spherical mercator (900913), you can download a .PRJ
file from the menu on
http://spatialreference.org/ref/sr-org/6627/
I've tried it in ArcMap - doesn't fit with a regular Mercator .prj file.
Yes; regular Mercator is something other than spherical
Hi,
Frederik Ramm wrote:
processed_p.shp is spherical mercator (properly EPSG:3857, formerly
EPSG:900913, and erroneously EPSG:3857).
The last bit should've been 3785. It was bound to happen.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
EPSG, too, seems to have problems with tagging. My understanding is that that
officially it is nowadays EPSG:3785, see
http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/3785/
However, that code is not widely supported yet. I believe EPSG:900913 is still
the most common in use. Best to keep the
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll keep investigating the idea of a centralised rules table
though.
Cool - if so, it might be interesting to see how this could relate to
the wiki also, not just renderers. Good luck :)
There was a similar study that has been done in Wikipedia - and it got
similar results. Then somebody else did some closer studies, and found
that the last edit may have been done by one of the 10%, but they were
often cosmetic cleanups. The bulk of creation was done by other
users. I wonder how
Thanks Paul,
I did answer, but am saving it in my drafts folder sent it to others for
peer review 1st.
Cheers,
Sam Vekemans
Across Canada Trails
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Sam Vekemans wrote:
Where the only way i know to map it is to use a
Hello,
I see that the newest Archos has a built-in GPS. Does anyone know if it
is possible to record traces with it? Is it possible to use other maps
besides the Tele-Atlas one that they sell?
Thanks in adavance,
N.
___
talk mailing list
2009/12/18 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll keep investigating the idea of a centralised rules table
though.
Cool - if so, it might be interesting to see how this could relate to
the wiki also, not just
2009/12/18 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
should be deleted then. Burning man follows a no trace policy. as
alternative it must be at least tagged different to disappear from maps.
This was discussed a while back, OSM isn't about the here and now
there is some historical information
2009/12/18 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
As I was considering doing a similar thing for Glastonbury, I was
wondering what the consensus on mapping temporary (but regular) structures?
Most people seem to tag it as if it exists all the time, I think in
the case of burning man, it tends to shift
2009/12/18 Nakor nakor...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I see that the newest Archos has a built-in GPS. Does anyone know if it
is possible to record traces with it? Is it possible to use other maps
besides the Tele-Atlas one that they sell?
Is that the one that uses android as the OS?
2009/12/18 Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com:
often cosmetic cleanups. The bulk of creation was done by other
users. I wonder how much this applies to mapping.
I've pondered about this before but I came to the conclusion that
mapping is a little different than adding knowledge to a wiki. You can
Yeah! Maybe we have to increase our efforts to announce that we exist? I
joined OSM in May 2008, but would have done it earlier if I had found
out about it before.
/Erik
Andreas Labres skrev:
They seem to be reinventing the wheel, somehow...
___
I just found their links page (http://openmaps.eu/links) where they link
to OpenStreetMap, so they are at least aware of our project.
/Erik
Erik Lundin skrev:
Yeah! Maybe we have to increase our efforts to announce that we exist? I
joined OSM in May 2008, but would have done it earlier if I
On 12/17/2009 08:53 PM, John Smith wrote:
2009/12/18 Nakor nakor...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I see that the newest Archos has a built-in GPS. Does anyone know if it
is possible to record traces with it? Is it possible to use other maps
besides the Tele-Atlas one that they sell?
Is that the one
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo
