Re: [OSM-talk] Geographic objects

2010-09-03 Thread Lennard
On 3-9-2010 19:37, Christian H. Bruhn wrote: I think it is very important to give geographic objects names and display them on a map. The map will look more complete and you can work the information e.g. if someone tells you that he went hiking in the Alpes and you don't know where they are, you

Re: [OSM-talk] Geographic objects

2010-09-03 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/3 Christian H. Bruhn : > Hi! > > If we look at the OSM-map (you can take each), there will be missing > the name of most of all geographic objects. You will not find the > Atlantic Ocean, the Alpes or anything else. I second this. I liked the idea expressed by Martin Simon on Talk-DE, who

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Noise vs unanswered questions

2010-09-03 Thread SteveC
Did you read the minutes where all the CT issues are being discussed? Have fun, Steve | stevecoast.com On Sep 3, 2010, at 3:03 AM, Simon Ward wrote: > On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:39:11PM +0100, Rob Myers wrote: >> On 09/02/2010 11:24 AM, TimSC wrote: > >>> 1) How is the future direction of OSM

[OSM-talk] Geographic objects

2010-09-03 Thread Christian H. Bruhn
Hi! If we look at the OSM-map (you can take each), there will be missing the name of most of all geographic objects. You will not find the Atlantic Ocean, the Alpes or anything else. I think it is very important to give geographic objects names and display them on a map. The map will look more co

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Would The ODbL and BY-SA Clash In A Database Extracted From a BY-SA Produced Work?

2010-09-03 Thread Rob Myers
On 09/03/2010 02:58 PM, Anthony wrote: And the provisions of CC-BY-SA would apply as well. To any BY-SA licenced work, yes. Unless you're talking about a CC-BY-SA produced work created solely from an ODbL database, anyway. See thread title. ;-) Which will be interesting when someone rele

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-03 Thread Peter Körner
Am 03.09.2010 13:23, schrieb Peter Körner: Ah, I see. The Planet-Extracts I worked with had the changesets stripped out, so I haven't thought about that. I'll change the script to import the changeset count, too. I have implemented the changeset count now. There's no filter capability (eg. dro

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-03 Thread Peter Körner
Am 03.09.2010 11:09, schrieb Lars Francke: The database schema is pretty easy though so if anyone has data laying around this is what I would need I've put together a script that creates this schema [1]. I used php& expat for the xml parsing and pl/pgsql for the counting/update/insert part.

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-03 Thread Lars Francke
>> The database schema is pretty easy though so if anyone has data laying >> around this is what I would need > > I've put together a script that creates this schema [1]. I used php & expat > for the xml parsing and pl/pgsql for the counting/update/insert part. Wow! That's awesome. Thank you for y

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-03 Thread Sam Vekemans
hi Peter, It will be great to see your resaults, then i can compare them with the current tagging system used by CanVec/Tiger/linz/garmin/mapnik/cyclemap/josm/potlatch/mapzen/merkaartor and others. I found that many tags are 'primary tag dependent', meaning that using the tag alone on a node/way/

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-03 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> Am 01.09.2010 15:15, schrieb Lars Francke: >> >> The database schema is pretty easy though so if anyone has data laying >> around this is what I would need: >> >> tag_keys: id integer, total_count integer, changeset_count integer, >> node_count integer, relation_count integer, way_count integer,

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMDoc is awesome!

2010-09-03 Thread Peter Körner
Am 01.09.2010 15:15, schrieb Lars Francke: The database schema is pretty easy though so if anyone has data laying around this is what I would need: tag_keys: id integer, total_count integer, changeset_count integer, node_count integer, relation_count integer, way_count integer, name character va