Hi All,
OpenStreetMap =*O* *S*tandard *M*ap
MapForTheRenderer=yes | I think the standard map should define how osm data
is displayed (not what is displayed)*1
DisplayEverything=yes | I think the standard map should display all data*2
DisplayOptions=yes | I think the standard map should offer the
Another possibility is somewhat radical:
- Non-routing or decorative ways for sidepaths.
The current highway tags are quite good for routing a pedestrian or cyclist
from intersection to intersection, and thus
over any reasonable distance.
However there's a desire for what amounts to drawing
On 25/04/15 17:22, pmailkeey . wrote:
First point is the definition of sidewalk as such they should never be
mapped as separate routes but tags for such added to the highway. If
there is no direct access from the footway to the carriageway, it is not
a sidewalk.
The bottom line is that this
On 25/04/15 21:09, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk
mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Bryce ... you still have to make the case for 'special cases'. There is
no reason to have two tags for many of these amenities.
That's not
On 25 April 2015 at 18:22, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
Another possibility is somewhat radical:
- Non-routing or decorative ways for sidepaths.
Maybe splitting routing tags (how it connects) from rendering (how it
looks) has merit.
I've always considered OSM to be two
Ich würde eher einen neuen tag einführen, der dann wirklich alles umfasst
das man damit taggen will, oder einen oder mehrere weitere tags um das
abzudecken, was zwar irgendwie öffentlich und ohne Personal Dinge oder
Services verteilt, dafür aber keine Bezahlung erfordert.
Hatten wir das nicht
Para una heladería podría ser algo parecido a esto:
presets xmlns=http://josm.openstreetmap.de/tagging-preset-1.0;
item name=Heladeria
label text=Inserta una Heladeria o ice cream /
text key=name text=Ice cream /
combo key=Ice cream text=Type values=text /
!-- Always setting
Im sure you heard the news. Any help is very much appreciated. Check the
wiki (link below) for details. Tnx!
cheers,
Maning Sambale (mobile)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Harry Wood m...@harrywood.co.uk
Date: Apr 25, 2015 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: [HOT] 7.9 earthquake in Nepal
To:
I've noticed the changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14080990 where the user
connected a bunch of highways/footways with the railway=station node
and used the name StreetToTransitConnection.
I've asked the user about this in the changeset comment but I've had no reply.
First
http://www.instructables.com/id/Mapillary-en-Raspberry-Pi/?ALLSTEPS Pour ceux
ne voulant pas payer une fortune pour le garmin d'ailleurs
Le Vendredi 24 avril 2015 16h44, Yves Pratter yves.prat...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Le 24 avr. 2015 à 14:41, dHuy Pierre dh...@yahoo.fr a écrit :
Il te suffit de grouper les tags en fonction de l'usage: s'il s'agit d'un
bureau informatif et et d'une vente de ticket tu mets les tags
tourism=information ET shop=ticket (pour moi le shop ticket serait plus
approprié que le travel_agency, qui correspond aux agneces de vacance type
Pierre et
Le 25 avril 2015 00:30, Vincent Privat vinc...@josm.openstreetmap.de a
écrit :
Il n'y a donc plus personne en France motivé pour participer à la
traduction de JOSM ? :(
C'est triste, la situation du français n'est pas terrible, il est
actuellement en 12ème position, loin derrière l'allemand,
Salut,
Le dimanche 19 avril 2015 09:40:44 Christian Quest a écrit :
Depuis la signature mercredi 15/4/2015 de notre convention autour de la
BAN avec l'IGN, La poste et Etalab, les données BAN sont disponible sous
licence ODbL via la diffusion faite par OSM-FR (prévue par la convention).
Dear all,
our current pedestrian routers often don't give street names, but instead only
instructions like look for the line on the map.
To improve that I would like to encourage mappers to give separately mapped
footways their proper name instead of leaving them without name.
The suggestion
On 25.04.2015 11:29, wrote Roland Olbricht:
A sidewalk (or bike lane) shall be mapped as a separate way only if a
pedestrian cannot cross the car lanes at any point, i.e. there are
fences or grass strip between footway and the car lanes.
Uh, the example in the other thread was a fence. Grass
(on dira pas non plus qu'il est buggué, mais quand je traduis deux fois
la même chaine à cinq minutes d'intervalle avec un passage par la page
d'accueil entre, c'est qu'il y a bien un problème quelque part aussi…)
Le 25/04/2015 09:52, David Crochet a écrit :
Bonjour
Le 25/04/2015 00:30,
I agree with suggesting adding names to sidewalks.
I'm not sure about only mapping sidewalks that are separated from the
road. I agree it has some logic to it, but what about mapping sidewalk
width, surface, markings on the ground for the blind, and all those
attributes a sidewalk can have?
Bonjour
Le 25/04/2015 11:06, Nicolas Dumoulin a écrit :
J'ai vu effectivement pas mal de gros numéro, genre 9000, qui semble
complètement farfelus à moins de trouver à quoi ils correspondent. J'ai
l'impression que ça pourrait correspondre à des POIs genre transformateur,
PEI,
Est-ce que ce
I've noticed the same changeset, and most of it is nonsense, and isn't
based on the actual connections. It isn't that it does no harm, because it
introduces footway connections where none actually exist.
I think the concept is good for stations that are well developed. Like
some stations you
Bonjour
Le 25/04/2015 00:30, Vincent Privat a écrit :
Il n'y a donc plus personne en France motivé pour participer à la
traduction de JOSM ? :(
Le système ne me plais pas pour traduire, je sais, je rabâche, mais
translatewiki.net est un bon procédé
cordialement
--
David Crochet
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Roland Olbricht olbri...@mentzdv.de wrote:
Dear all,
our current pedestrian routers often don't give street names, but instead
only instructions like look for the line on the map.
To improve that I would like to encourage mappers to give separately mapped
As somebody that has mapped a fair amount of sidewalks as separate ways
(for good reasons) I'm rather split on the issue (and as a tendency
against adding names to objects that don't actually have them).
The adding a tag to the street in question is all fine and dandy, if
- it is actually a
Am 25.04.2015 um 12:30 schrieb Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
Uh, the example in the other thread was a fence. Grass strips are easily
crossable for most pedestrians.
Given the number of problems that arise from separately mapping
sidewalks, we should only do it if strictly
Hello,
I have no problem with most of it, but can you please come up with
something else in stead of cycleway=sidewalk. This sounds like the
cyclists have to cycle on the part of the road reserved for pedestrians
or if the cycleway itself has a sidewalk.
I don't know if cycleway=sidepath is
Le samedi 25 avril 2015 00:30:41 Vincent Privat a écrit :
Il n'y a donc plus personne en France motivé pour participer à la
traduction de JOSM ? :(
Salut,
Je viens d'en faire quelques uns, mais bon difficile de traduire des messages
que je n'ai jamais rencontrés …
--
Nicolas Dumoulin
Am 25.04.2015 um 11:57 schrieb Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com:
I'm not sure about only mapping sidewalks that are separated from the road.
I agree it has some logic to it, but what about mapping sidewalk width,
surface, markings on the ground for the blind, and all those attributes a
Hi,
On 04/25/2015 12:33 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
To improve that I would like to encourage mappers to give separately mapped
footways their proper name instead of leaving them without name.
Why do that instead of just adding a single tag to the road?
Roland's use case is routing for
Am 24.04.2015 um 17:23 schrieb AJ Ashton aj.ash...@gmail.com:
Yes, if Lake Superior is mapped as natural=coastline (which I think is the
easier-to-maintain approach for such a large complex water body) then we
should remove natural=water from the multipolygon relation (r4039486). Does
Les pseudo numéros en 5xxx 9xxx proviennent de la DGFiP.
Ils peuvent être en prénumérotation comme ton exemple de 9012 9014,
mais aussi servir à numéroter des propriétés là où il n'y a pas de
numéro (cas typique de nombreux hameaux).
Les CIDEX c'est postal, et La Poste ne leur attribue par
First point is the definition of sidewalk as such they should never be
mapped as separate routes but tags for such added to the highway. If there
is no direct access from the footway to the carriageway, it is not a
sidewalk.
Cartinus, cycleway=sidewalk is understandable by me as being a shared
Hi Andy
I suggest the obvious natural=fossil
Rgds
brian
On 23 April 2015 at 10:47, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
Several buildings in Birmingham (and no doubt elsewhere) have visible
fossils in their stonework. I'm interested in tagging these; can
anyone suggest how best
31 matches
Mail list logo
