[OSM-talk] inclination changes (bends) WAS Re: Unsealed footways/cycleways/paths and rendering

sent from a phone > Am 01.07.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Greg Troxel : > > Reading the page, smoothness=bad is passable by a > normal car but not a sports car, so that's actually worse than a decent > dirt road. by the way, sports cars can also have problems on paved roads sometimes, eg on steep (

Re: [OSM-talk] Unsealed footways/cycleways/paths and rendering

Fernando Trebien writes: > Do you think it is necessary, for the general user, to visually > distinguish unsealed (unpaved/poor surface) footways/cycleways/paths > from those that are sealed? This has been raised in an issue related > to unsealed roads (with focus on motorized traffic) [1]. Nec

Re: [OSM-talk] Entances (was Layers and landuse)

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 03:47:14PM +0100, Lester Caine wrote: > On 30/06/15 11:36, Richard Z. wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:14:07PM +0100, Lester Caine wrote: > >> On 29/06/15 15:08, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >>> The step from 2D to 3D would add a lot of complexity on the mappers, > >>>