Hi,
On 25.07.2017 16:21, althio wrote:
> As I read your message, I failed to see your points.
> I might be missing something obvious, or at least clear for some
> advanced mappers.
I looked at the first image that Christoph referred to and it was
immediately clear to me what he was talking about,
On Wednesday 26 July 2017, Clifford Snow wrote:
> A contact in Microsoft said that the Bing imagery is made up of
> multiple images which results in the date range.
That is definitely not the case locally on a tile basis in most
situations but it is of course possible that Microsoft manages image
A contact in Microsoft said that the Bing imagery is made up of multiple
images which results in the date range.
The imagery we are getting has improved over time, although it seems at a
snails pace. I'm sure if we were paying for imagery we would have different
requirements. Bing probably wants n
Hi,
On 07/25/2017 06:57 PM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> likewise for the DigitalGlobe images which have no recording
> date information at all.
On https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/@kevin_bullock/diary/41132, Kevin
Bullock writes "We are working to provide metadata (image acquisition
date) for
On Tuesday 25 July 2017, SwiftFast wrote:
>
> By the way, the following tool shows Bing dates or date ranges
> easily: http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/
Good point, this way i can also show some examples:
http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=65.5539846374678&lon=-22.
I am not seeing a decline in accuracy in the areas I am familiar with.
By the way, the following tool shows Bing dates or date ranges easily:
http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstre
There's no technical issue at all, he can see the meta data. Microsoft can
push what ever meta data they want or none at all. I was just suggesting a
solution to Christoph's issue with lacking meta data
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 1:56 PM, SwiftFast wrote:
> OP asked a about a very specific technica
OP asked a about a very specific technical issue. There's no point in
bringing up the downsides of armchair mapping in this thread.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
"Best is to only map areas that you visit and verify yourself"
And the email thread was hot osm webinar
On Jul 25, 2017 1:24 PM, "Christoph Hormann" wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 July 2017, James wrote:
> > Griping about it on the mailing list won't really solve anything.
>
> I just wanted to share t
On Tuesday 25 July 2017, James wrote:
> Griping about it on the mailing list won't really solve anything.
I just wanted to share the observation and maybe see if this is possibly
something that varies regionally and others have a different experience
with it.
No big deal.
> To paraphrase you f
Griping about it on the mailing list won't really solve anything. Microsoft
can do what they please.
To paraphrase you from another email chain:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Do_Not_Trace_from_Outdated_Imagery
On Jul 25, 2017 1:00 PM, "Christoph Hormann" wrote:
> On Tuesday
On Tuesday 25 July 2017, James wrote:
> Maybe you should stick to local mapping/survey the location to assess
> the image quality
Yes, obviously that is always the best option when possible. But tell
that to all the mappers who re-create buildings that show up in images
although they have meanw
Maybe you should stick to local mapping/survey the location to assess the
image quality
On Jul 25, 2017 12:22 PM, "Christoph Hormann" wrote:
>
> I wonder if anyone else noticed the widespread decline in the accuracy
> of capture date metadata in Bing images as you can see it in JOSM
> via 'show
In an ideal world there would be as many skilled mappers per square
kilometre as there are in Germany.
Unfortunately the density of mappers available elsewhere is not the same.
In many parts of the world there are very few maps and these are not of a
high quality. HOT and the missing maps projec
I wonder if anyone else noticed the widespread decline in the accuracy
of capture date metadata in Bing images as you can see it in JOSM
via 'show tile info'?
It seems to me in many cases in rural areas we get pretty useless ranges
of dates now - the longest span i have seen so far is 2003-201
On Tuesday 25 July 2017, althio wrote:
>
> As I read your message, I failed to see your points.
> I might be missing something obvious, or at least clear for some
> advanced mappers.
> Maybe you could explain in some more details the problems with this
> mapping guide?
I indeed find this obvious.
Hello Christoph,
As I read your message, I failed to see your points.
I might be missing something obvious, or at least clear for some
advanced mappers.
Maybe you could explain in some more details the problems with this
mapping guide?
On 25 July 2017 at 15:54, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> I am fr
On Monday 24 July 2017, Gysler Castelino wrote:
> [...] Typically, Missing Maps
> (see e.g. http://tasks.hotosm.org/) often includes the instruction to
> map (1) buildings, and then (2) group buildings into residential
> areas. However, the 'residential area' definition is tricky, and
> volunteer m
18 matches
Mail list logo
