Re: [OSM-talk-be] Import of GPX files for marked trails in OSM / Import de traces GPX pour promenades balisées dans OSM

Génial ! Count me in. J’ai l’expérience de ce genre de relation et suis donc opérationnel. Matthieu G. (en mode mobile) > Le 20 août 2020 à 07:46, Julien Minet a écrit : > >  > Hello / Bonjour, > > Thanks to an active lobbying of Jacques Fondaire, contributor in Aubange, we > had the

[OSM-talk-be] Import of GPX files for marked trails in OSM / Import de traces GPX pour promenades balisées dans OSM

Hello / Bonjour, Thanks to an active lobbying of Jacques Fondaire, contributor in Aubange, we had the explicit right (well, an email) to use some GPX files from the local tourism offices from the province of Luxembourg for completing the marked trails in South-Luxembourg in OSM. We did not

Re: [Talk-cr] Añadir alertas según CNE al mapa de OSM

Etiqueté algunos cantones, pero el mapa no se puede visualizar. En la wiki de Costa Rica no están todos los cantones del país. Convendría agregar los enlaces a sus respectivas relaciones, pues ya aparecen en la base de datos: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/XdL On 8/19/20 9:52 PM, Jaime Gutiérrez

[Talk-cr] Añadir alertas según CNE al mapa de OSM

Hola, espero que estén muy bien. Les quiero proponer que añadamos a los cantones (relaciones con `admin_level=6`) una etiqueta para indicar el estado de alerta de emergencia en la que están los cantones del país. Hoy en día este dato es muy útil pues según el nivel de alerta se establecen las

Re: [OSM-talk] Use of OSM data without attribution

On 19/08/2020 22:44, Clifford Snow wrote: ...  Instead of suggesting their users edit OSM, they instead instruct them to email d...@openstreetmap.org , Indeed, and by the time they get to us they are usually "rabbits of negative euphoria"* because of the less

Re: [Talk-at] OSM AT Erreichbarkeit

On 20.08.20 00:10, scubbx wrote: Das Thema Local Chapter wird vom Verein seit ca. 2-3 Jahren immer wieder mal diskutiert. Auch dies hättest du bei jeder der öffentlichen Versammlungen mitbekommen können. Ich fordere dich auf, die Verbreitung von Unwahrheiten zu unterlassen, genauso wie wilde

Re: [OSM-talk] Use of OSM data without attribution

I have already heard back from the CEO of AllTrails. See his response below. They are going to fix the issue. I am impressed! = Thanks for the note, Mike. I know that this is going to sound lame but I swear it's the truth, and that's that you found a bug on our

Re: [OSM-talk] Use of OSM data without attribution

sent from a phone > On 20. Aug 2020, at 00:18, Mike Thompson wrote: > > Thanks for the link where they mention OSM. I did find their CEO on > Linkedin, and just sent him this message: thank you! You may also consider adding them here:

Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo stile di Google Maps

sent from a phone > On 20. Aug 2020, at 00:20, totera wrote: > > Questo avrebbe potuto essere un punto di forza di OSM, e invece non abbiamo > neanche una modalità univoca per mappare le strisce... non fa niente, ne abbiamo 2-3, ma se vuoi fare una mappa non ti impedisce l’esistenza di più

Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo stile di Google Maps

Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote > https://www.ilpost.it/2020/08/19/google-maps-cambiera-un-po/ "Per quanto riguarda le città, Google ha spiegato di aver lavorato per rendere più facile riconoscere aree e attraversamenti pedonali, così da rendere più utile l’utilizzo delle mappe anche a chi si vuole

Re: [OSM-talk] Use of OSM data without attribution

Steve, Thanks for the confirmation that the attribution is missing. I will let you, and the rest of the list, know if and when I hear from them. Mike On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:51 PM stevea wrote: > Thanks very much you two: I've often meant to do something about > alltrails' seeming /

Re: [OSM-talk] Use of OSM data without attribution

Clifford, Thanks for the link where they mention OSM. I did find their CEO on Linkedin, and just sent him this message: == Hi Ron, I noticed that AllTrails uses OSM data for its trails on the default "AllTrails Map Layer", while you mention this fact on your

Re: [Talk-at] OSM AT Erreichbarkeit

Die Mitgliederversammlungen des OSM-AT Vereins waren immer öffentlich und die darin diskutierte Finanzlage des Vereins genau so transparent wie unbeeindruckend. Das Thema Local Chapter wird vom Verein seit ca. 2-3 Jahren immer wieder mal diskutiert. Auch dies hättest du bei jeder der öffentlichen

Re: [OSM-talk] Use of OSM data without attribution

Thanks very much you two: I've often meant to do something about alltrails' seeming / actual lack of attribution to OSM (if it exists, I haven't found it either) and something always seems to creep up and prevent me from taking action. These are most assuredly "our" (OSM's / mine, others in

Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo stile di Google Maps

sent from a phone > On 19. Aug 2020, at 22:20, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > > Piú contrasto, piú colori, piú dettagli... si può dire che Google Maps > si avvicina al layer di base di osm.org? vediamo come se lo cavano, avevo l’impressione che la loro mappa era diventata praticamente

Re: [OSM-talk] Use of OSM data without attribution

Hey Mike, They definitely mention OSM, even call us a partner [1] but like you found their basemap is definitely OSM. Instead of suggesting their users edit OSM, they instead instruct them to email d...@openstreetmap.org, All Trails is located in SF but I couldn't find any listing of a leadership

Re: [Talk-at] OSM AT Erreichbarkeit

openstreetmap.at tritt also ohne den Status eines local chapter innezuhaben, unter dem Namen von OpenStreetMap auf, und generiert definitiv daraus auch Einnahmen unbekannter Höhe. Der Betrieb der Website erfolgt offenkundig unzuverlässig. Ich finde man sollte das Recht unter dem Namen von OSM

Re: [Talk-GB] Eat out to help out data

Hey Rob, if they made up their mind about the license (https://github.com/hmrc/eat-out-to-help-out-establishments/issues/3 - Apache 2.0 is software, not data) the ~100 entries with wrong postcode data (https://github.com/hmrc/eat-out-to-help-out-establishments/issues/18) out of 62k entries

[Talk-it] Nuovo stile di Google Maps

https://www.ilpost.it/2020/08/19/google-maps-cambiera-un-po/ Piú contrasto, piú colori, piú dettagli... si può dire che Google Maps si avvicina al layer di base di osm.org? Rivalutare il minimalismo a tutti i costi sicuramente non guasta. Federico ___

[Talk-GB] Eat out to help out data

Hi all, Anyone considered using the Eat out to Help out data that HMRC have published to aid with mapping efforts? https://github.com/hmrc/eat-out-to-help-out-establishments Prior to this, there was a scraper that collated the data: https://github.com/svenlatham/eatout-scraper Thank you, *Rob*

[OSM-talk] Use of OSM data without attribution

Has anyone tried contacting the AllTrails[0] people about their use of OSM without attribution? I am not talking about the "OSM Map Layer" that they offer, but rather the default "AllTrails Map Layer." At the very least it appears that the trails on that layer come from OSM. I know that because

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Diagramme de transport publique

Je pense avoir trouvé... il y a un brin par horaire J'ai fait un essais sur la ligne 22 avec deux relations supplémentaire avec des horaires et ça commence à rendre quelques choses de similaire : https://overpass-api.de/api/sketch-line?ref=22=Citibus Le 19/08/2020 à 21:21, Gad.Jo a écrit :

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Diagramme de transport publique

J'ai oublié de partager le lien vers le diagramme qui me poste question Celui qui fonctionne bien : https://overpass-api.de/api/sketch-line?ref=10=Libero Celui dont je ne comprend pas le rendu : https://overpass-api.de/api/sketch-line?ref=15=Citibus Pouvez-vous m'indiquer ce qui ne va pas

Re: [Talk-at] OSM AT Erreichbarkeit

Hallo liebe Leute, die Mailing-Liste sehe ich wie alle weiteren offiziellen Openstreetmap.org Mailinglisten mit voller Berechtigung. Übersicht über Openstreetmap.org Mailinglisten: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mailing_lists Beste Grüße aus der Steiermark, Erwin On 8/17/20 8:13 PM,

Re: [Talk-at] OSM AT Erreichbarkeit

Hallo, On 19.08.20 17:58, Rudolf Mayer wrote: > Ich kann bei FOSSGIS auch nirgends sehen, dass sie auch Österreich > repräsentieren.. Der FOSSGIS ist die Regional-Organisation ("Local Chapter") der OSGeo Foundation für die Region D-A-CH, aber bei OpenStreetMap ist der FOSSGIS ausschliesslich für

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 15:36, SK53 wrote: > This isn't necessarily true. If you open any OS Open Data product in QGIS one > is now confronted by a bewildering array of ways of converting from the OSGB > national grid co-ordinates to WGS84. > > The optimum one currently uses the 2015 file of

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

There is even a (never merged and now likely really stale) PR: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/4166 SImon PS: and an issue too Am 19.08.2020 um 11:20 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB: > Have you checked whatever > there is an open issue proposing to > support imagery offset

Re: [Talk-at] OSM AT Erreichbarkeit

Hallo, On 19/08/2020 17:29, Johann Haag wrote: Am Mi., 19. Aug. 2020 um 14:18 Uhr schrieb Kevin Kofler mailto:kevin.kof...@chello.at>>: Johann Haag wrote: > Wiener Verein […] > Wiener Verein […] > Wiener Verein […] > Wiener Verein Ist das Thema local

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

I contribute a bit to the development of iD and have interacted with the current lead developer (who's currently not funded to work on it full time anymore) as well as the previous (who's moved on to RapiD) numerous times. As it's open source software my suggestion would be to interface using the

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

On 2020-08-19 17:21, Russ Garrett wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 16:00, Colin Smale wrote: > >> At least it sounds soluble. Given the right transform and corrections a >> "definitive" OS point in Easting/Northing format can be translated >> accurately to WGS84 lat/long. However you look at

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

On 19/08/2020 16:21, Russ Garrett wrote: 5m accuracy You'll accumulate that error in a couple of centuries, just from continental drift: , given that OSM is referenced to WGS-84, not the British mainland.

Re: [Talk-at] OSM AT Erreichbarkeit

Am Mi., 19. Aug. 2020 um 14:18 Uhr schrieb Kevin Kofler < kevin.kof...@chello.at>: > Johann Haag wrote: > > Wiener Verein > […] > > Wiener Verein > […] > > Wiener Verein > […] > > Wiener Verein > Ist das Thema local chapter, wirklich derart schwer zu verstehen?

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

I'm glad I started a discussion, even if there aren't any real answers. It is going to be an increasing problem I fear and one I think OSM needs a solid answer to. In SW London, I've just checked against "OS OpenData StreetView" and all my edits (and thus Esri World Clarity Beta) all match pretty

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 16:00, Colin Smale wrote: > At least it sounds soluble. Given the right transform and corrections a > "definitive" OS point in Easting/Northing format can be translated accurately > to WGS84 lat/long. However you look at it, I would expect a purely > mathematical

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

At least it sounds soluble. Given the right transform and corrections a "definitive" OS point in Easting/Northing format can be translated accurately to WGS84 lat/long. However you look at it, I would expect a purely mathematical transformation should have less error than a transformation

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 14:52, Jass Kurn wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 13:58, Colin Smale wrote: > >> Possibly even better that StreetView imagery is data that has been >> imported directly from OS, such as OS Boundary-Line for the admin >> boundaries. This is probably the closest we can get

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

This isn't necessarily true. If you open any OS Open Data product in QGIS one is now confronted by a bewildering array of ways of converting from the OSGB national grid co-ordinates to WGS84. The optimum one currently uses the 2015 file of detailed offset corrections to the basic projection

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 13:58, Colin Smale wrote: > Possibly even better that StreetView imagery is data that has been > imported directly from OS, such as OS Boundary-Line for the admin > boundaries. This is probably the closest we can get to cm-level accuracy - > even though they don't give us

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

“I would like it if the iD 'adjust imagery tool' button were more visible.”I agree on this, it needs to be more prominent and ideally iD would make it’s users align the imagery before letting them edit. Dose iD’s tutorial/guide teach about offsets?If not I think it should as they are very

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

On 2020-08-19 12:17, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 19/08/2020 10:11, Stephen Colebourne wrote:And now I can see Amazon > mappers using an iD variant > that doesn't have the offset and moving all the roads as a result: > https://osmcha.org/changesets/89549551?aoi=758c7f2b-faca-44e5-acd2-0cb8c33034bd

Re: [Talk-at] OSM AT Erreichbarkeit

Johann Haag wrote: > Wiener Verein […] > Wiener Verein […] > Wiener Verein […] > Wiener Verein Ah, daher weht also der Wind, das "gute alte" Wien-Bashing… Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

19 Aug 2020, 12:17 by ajt1...@gmail.com: > To be honest, I'd never trust any imagery anywhere until I've seen how it > compares with other available sources in that area (GPS traces, OS OpenData > StreetView, etc.). > Not sure is there such dataset in UK, but Polish government releases aerial

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

On 19/08/2020 10:11, Stephen Colebourne wrote: And now I can see Amazon mappers using an iD variant that doesn't have the offset and moving all the roads as a result: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89549551?aoi=758c7f2b-faca-44e5-acd2-0cb8c33034bd

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

For what it's worth, I feel like Bing has less offset overall. A lot of south London has been aligned to the previous Bing imagery which is almost certainly worse than the current Bing imagery. My impression is that Bing is "more correct" than most other imagery sources. Unfortunately the levels

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 10:51, Alan Mackie wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Aug 2020, 10:13 Stephen Colebourne, > wrote: > >> So, I followed the links below and added an offset. But this simply >> isn't a viable solution to the problem because it only works for JOSM >> and not iD. >> >> I managed to

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020, 10:13 Stephen Colebourne, wrote: > So, I followed the links below and added an offset. But this simply > isn't a viable solution to the problem because it only works for JOSM > and not iD. > > I managed to convince one mapper to type in the offset manually in iD > every

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

Have you checked whatever there is an open issue proposing to support imagery offset database in iD? 19 Aug 2020, 11:11 by scolebou...@joda.org: > So, I followed the links below and added an offset. But this simply > isn't a viable solution to the problem because it only works for JOSM > and not

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

So, I followed the links below and added an offset. But this simply isn't a viable solution to the problem because it only works for JOSM and not iD. I managed to convince one mapper to type in the offset manually in iD every time, but that is a horrible thing to ask new mappers to do, very

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Server Notification 8/18/2020 1:07:45 p.m.

Please keep the mailing list. It is not high volume, it allows searching trough archives, it is easy to acces (no login, extra software), easy to invite someone (software developer, gouvernement official, ...) > Op 19 aug. 2020 om 09:15 heeft Jonathan Beliën het volgende > geschreven: > > 

[Talk-de] Einladung zum OSMF-Mumble am 20.08. um 20:00 Uhr

Hallo zusammen, der FOSSGIS e.V. ist von OSMF Board eingeladen worden, auf dem nächsten Boardmeeting 10 Minuten über das deutsches Local Chapter an sich sowie über Themen, die dem Verein wichtig sind, zu sprechen. Diese Präsentation wird am Donnerstag den 27.08 um 18:00 Uhr am Ende des