On 02/02/2013 19:55, Michal Migurski wrote:
For what it's worth, I agree with Jeff and Paweł on this.
If OSMF is going to be a big, beautiful mess it should own that and publish the
CD for everyone to see. Anarchists gonna anarchate.
If on the other hand we want strong leadership that can
On 02/02/2013 21:01, Aun Yngve Johnsen wrote:
This discussion is way out of hand. You guys screaming for publishing the C+D,
didn't you see the answer from SimonPoole? They have asked lawyers about advise
in publishing it, as well as releasing more information about it. It is not a
sign of
On 02/02/2013 22:07, Paweł Paprota wrote:
On 02/02/2013 10:23 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
Threats to leave the project remind me of the bullshit thrown around
during licence-change when hardly anyone actually had the balls to
follow through. If people are so unhappy then go, but do so quickly
and
On 02/02/2013 23:17, Frederik Ramm wrote:
The OSMF board discussed this issue at their F2F meeting in Berlin
last November (meeting minutes:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_Minutes_2012-11-03).
At the meeting we churned through several variations on the topic of
who is the
On 01/02/2013 16:52, Cartinus wrote:
Huh?
What's really touchy is the osmf being secretive about something.
If you got a letter from some lawyer, then the only way you might get
all the volunteers in this project to comply is telling them what is
happening.
Original Message
On 01/02/2013 18:11, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/2/1 Simon Poole si...@osmfoundation.org:
issue with respect to the trademark GEOCODE owned by Geocode, Inc. of
Alexandria, Virginia, USA. There are likely to be further related edits and
changes both on the wiki and the help site. Please do
On 02/01/2013 10:46, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/1/2 Robin Paulson ro...@bumblepuppy.org:
i was looking for unusual uses of osm data, and found this:
http://store.axismaps.com/product/boston-blue
Oops! We couldn’t find that page.
Took a quick look at the store homepage and clicked
On 02/01/2013 15:20, Richard Weait wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de
mailto:o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Am 02.01.2013 11:41, Robin Paulson wrote:
http://store.axismaps.com/product/boston-blue
osm is mentioned on the web site, but not
On 04/11/2012 16:48, Andrew MacKinnon wrote:
In my opinion, copying from Google Street View is still a legally
dubious thing to do. There is no formal licensing agreement with
Google that I know of. It is perfectly fine to capture data by taking
pictures yourself, but relying on Google Street
If there was once HTML at the URL (not just images) it's long gone. If it's
always been just a directory index, mark it up as another of SAV's
near-legendary false alarms. ;-) (IIRC a defs update false pozzed the entire
google-analytics.com domain last year)
Chris
_
From: Barnett,
I concur, railway stations most often don't have Station after their name
so they should be recorded as-is on the primary signage / on-platform
signage (if people can be bothered to doublecheck the platforms). Using the
National Rail site should be doable to acquire the definitive station names,
-Original Message-
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of
marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com
Sent: 13 February 2009 07:14
To: George Styles
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Beta testers required for new Windows
...and York probably wins the prize for the shortest street
with the silliest name:
http://openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4437062
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whip-Ma-Whop-Ma_Gate
To be honest, I've always fancied living on either Australia Road,
Commonwealth Avenue, India Way, Canada Way
BTW - I hope you can even
_read_ this mail because it's PGP/MIME signed).
Quite legible ;) Outlook copes far better than I think some give it credit
for! (and I'd like to see Thunderbird seamlessly sync with my WinMo
smartphone, the last time I tried it as an alternative it munged half of my
And have you been convinced sending the author two
messages...makes sense? or that the default behavior is a
private response to a public conversation...
I have even found direct emails quite close to rude.(mostly
when the responder actually was rude) the default reply
should simply
The default responder to public conversation venues needs to be to
just that ...
There's no way OSM could change that default, it's up to your
MUA vendor. The buttons you're currently using are reply
(with an implied to author) and reply to all, not reply
(default) and reply
iirc, the problem was caused by non-standard (but 'simpler')
behaviour of e-mail clients/mailing lists, and people
becoming accustomed to that behaviour rather than the
standard way of doing things. i imagine microsoft were
involved somewhere, but others are probably as bad.
now some
On Jul 26, 2008, at 13:37 , Franc Carter wrote:
My entirely annecdotal experience has been that my TomTom 910 takes
longer to get a fix when I am moving than stationary. I have an
external aerial, so the movement should be the main determinent
The same for me with my Hamlet GPS
_
From: D Tucny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 June 2008 04:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Navman B10 SiRFstarIII receiver - any good?
2008/6/20 Christopher Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This isn't strictly OSM-related, but I do use my
This isn't strictly OSM-related, but I do use my Bluetooth GPS unit to take
tracks with my smartphone, so I suppose it applies. I'm just looking at this
Navman unit with the SS3 chipset, it's got good reviews and apparently it's
quite sensitive - but more importantly, is it accurate?
Does the
I have a handful of machines at my disposal (less than ten but more than
three!) that I'm interested in using to contribute towards rendering tiles.
However, I can't find an easy way of signing up, I can't attach to the
project in BOINC and there's not much help on the TAH site.
Can someone get
Install guide is here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Tiles%40home/Install_Guide
Christ on a bike, I saw the link to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] pages and I totally
forgot to
check the rest of that wiki page. I've had a bit of a 'special' day today.
Thanks all ;)
i've noticed that there are two tags for places where people
are buried - cemetery and graveyard, with an ambiguous
distinction between the two
this proposal is to make one obsolete
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/graveyard
comments are welcome
I don't
That sounds ace - I only live down Hagley Road, so I think I'll have to
attend this!
I hope I can struggle out of bed on Sunday morning... I'll only have
returned from a week in France on the morning of the 2nd (annual music
industry trade show down in Cannes) but this sounds like an absolutely
24 matches
Mail list logo
