On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Max wrote:
> Additionally it is a mind booggling case of anglocentrism and neo
> colonialism to put english words all over parts of the world where
> people have different scripts and have no idea what those words mean and
> how they
2. I haven't seen anyone on this list disagree with the OSM general
method of expanding road identifiers (Street, Lane, Boulevard,
etc.). So we can agree on that and I think move forward with the
general proposal around name expansion.
Could we also apply this to exit_to=* or
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
Taking a step back, is the above use case not one we'd like to support
without triggering share alike? I'm directing my question to everyone, not
just Paul who's taken the time to review my example above.
Thanks for taking
or giving data back when you fix things.
This is a gross oversimplification of share-alike. And the imperfections in
the license extend beyond geocoding. I don't want to rehash the arguments,
as Alex Barth did http://stateofthemap.us/session/more-open/ very
eloquently at State of the Map US.
Alex,
I agree with you!
Figured I'd speak up as it always seems the no votes get all the attention
on the list.
-Jake
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.frwrote:
I've posted a comment on Alex post, but I need to clarify a few things.
The part were I also
Alex,
I agree with you!
Figured I'd speak up as it always seems the no votes get all the attention
on the list.
-Jake
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.frwrote:
I've posted a comment on Alex post, but I need to clarify a few things.
The part were I also
Alex,
I'm a little confused. The way I interpret your comment, merely storing
ODbL and non-ODbL data in the same database triggers share alike. But on
the use cases wiki page (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/License/Use_Cases), Case 4 says:
'It makes no difference whether you store the data
7 matches
Mail list logo