Alex, I'm a little confused. The way I interpret your comment, merely storing ODbL and non-ODbL data in the same database triggers share alike. But on the use cases wiki page ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/License/Use_Cases), Case 4 says: 'It makes no difference whether you store the data sets separately, or together in the same "database" software, whether that is a RDBMS, NOSQL, filesystem or anything else. So long as the other data isn't derived from OSM, the result is a Collective Database, not a Derivative Database.' In other words, storing ODbL and non-ODbL data together does not trigger share alike.
Just trying to get some clarification. Thanks, Jake On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Alex Barth <[email protected]> wrote: > Rob - as long as you don't mix ODbL data and other data in the same > database, ODbL's share alike cause doesn't kick in. So using the OSM tiles > on your web site doesn't mean that data in your web site is affected. I > recommend reading the ODbL, it's pretty clear that way > http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/ > > (And yes, I know, an open license shouldn't be that long and that > complicated, but that's another story). > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> It would appear that any and all data associated with a >> >> website or mobile app becomes fair game once OSM data is used. >> >> > What? No. No, that isn't true. I'm no fan of share-alike but that is >> > trivially disprovable. >> >> Where is the line in the sand? >> >> For example I have a website which is driven by several databases >> whichinclude everything from website members info t >> >> I then integrate OSM into the website by including interactive map tiles, >> address searches (geocoding), POI placement / inclusion, routing, etc... >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Feb 27, 2013, at 4:54 PM, Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > WhereAmI wrote: >> >> It would appear that any and all data associated with a >> >> website or mobile app becomes fair game once OSM >> >> data is used. >> > >> > What? No. No, that isn't true. I'm no fan of share-alike but that is >> > trivially disprovable. >> > >> > Richard >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > View this message in context: >> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-License-question-user-clicking-on-map-tp5750253p5751314.html >> > Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > legal-talk mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >> >> _______________________________________________ >> legal-talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >> > > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > >
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
