SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On 20 Jan 2009, at 11:08, MJ Ray wrote:
Appealing for patience is all well and good, but it sounds like if
Peter hadn't acted when OSMF and the trademark agent had not acted in
time, it might have become criminal to call some things openstreetmap
tomorrow!
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: [...]
I.e. he was saying that nobody was needed to make it criminal - that
the simple grant of a trademark would be sufficient to do that.
I can't believe he's right but I think that's what he said. [...]
If I hadn't been seeing this steadily
Hi,
SteveC wrote:
If you think I'm a total idiot, then yes, I would have tried to make
it criminal to use an un-granted trade mark [...]
I think MJ Ray's argument was that even *without* any action from the
trade mark owner's part, use of the trademark by third parties without
express
Hi,
Peter Miller wrote:
Saying 'bombarded' is hardly fair. For the record I email the board on
the 23rd Dec and received no reply. I emailed again on the 8th Jan
requesting a response to my earlier email and threatening to object the
following day. I had a response but it was not clear. I
I checked on the Intellectual Property Office's website over the
weekend and discovered that the trademark applications previously
discussed on this list were still in SteveC's personal name. This
concerned me as the final date on which objections could be lodged for
one of them was the
Dear all
Speaking from a personal point of view as the guy who founded the
project, registered the domains and trademarks and all that...
I can make absolutely clear I handed off all ownership of the domains
and trademarks to the foundation. I would invite others to do the same
for the
On 19 Jan 2009, at 21:06, SteveC wrote:
Peter of course knows all of this because he's been repeatedly
bombarding board and team members with threatening emails. It's
unfortunate that his core, often valid, concerns and objections are
so often overtaken by personal attacks and bridge
7 matches
Mail list logo
